Add comparison to other packages

[albertpod]

This PR addresses #71

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (215f458) 81.03% compared to head (2e049a3) 81.03%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #162   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.03%   81.03%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        1271     1271           
=======================================
  Hits         1030     1030           
  Misses        241      241           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[albertpod]

@HoangMHNguyen made a few changes. Something occurred to me. Instead of binary table, perhaps we can make a ternary table.

For example, RxInfer is not universal compared to Turing, but it's more universal compared to ForneyLab or PGMax.

WDYT?

[HoangMHNguyen]

@albertpod I think that's a good idea, but we can just write an extra note below the table instead of creating a new table.

[bvdmitri]

I understand that PR is not yet ready for review and part of it was probably auto-generated, but please remove all strange and complicated words and use something simple. These text is aimed for non-native speakers, how often do you encounter words such as "sluggishness", "amalgamating", "prowess", "succinctly". Have no idea what do these mean. Most of the text is written in such a manner and this is unreadable for a non-native.

[albertpod]

@albertpod I think that's a good idea, but we can just write an extra note below the table instead of creating a new table.

@HoangMHNguyen perhaps we can use ~ symbol to denote partial capability?
Something like:
✓ : Full capability or feature is present.
~ : Partial capability or feature is present.
✗ : No capability or feature.

[HoangMHNguyen]

Yes, that's even a better idea

[bvdmitri]

That is the status of this PR? Can it be reviewed and merged potentially? (Sorry if I missed smth, just trying to catch up after my sickness)

[bvdmitri]

@HoangMHNguyen @albertpod is this ready?

[albertpod]

@bvdmitri yes

[bvdmitri]

Great, I skimmed through it, looks good to me! Thanks guys!!