refactor(Tumblr): Use a common filter patch

[leumasme]

Depends on ReVanced/revanced-integrations#479

Previously, we blocked tumblr timeline objects by replacing their expected "object_type" string that is returned from the api.
This was suboptimal for a few reasons:

• It created a lot of boilerplate with finding and replacing strings
• It didn't completely remove the objects from the timeline, they just failed to parse so they were objects. These are not visible, but still reserve space when the timeline is initially created, leading to layout shifting which was visible if the blocked timeline object was in view right away.

This PR adds a Timeline Filter Patch, which

• Injects a call to the integration filter method in Timeline and PostsResponse which are used for the front page and the blog view (clicking on a blog to see only posts from this block) respectively.
• Presents a addObjectTypeFilter(typename: String) method which injects the equivalent of
  if ("$typename".equals(elementType)) iterator.remove()
  into the integration filter function.

The two patches DisableTumblrLivePatch and DisableDashboardAdsPatch patch have also been updated to use the new timeline filtering.

Additionally, more blocked ad post types were added to DisableDashboardAds since some ads were still visible
Wait, why are some patch file names suffixed with Patch and some are not? I guess I will just leave it like this.

[leumasme]

@oSumAtrIX The refactor in your latest commit (oops, looks like I accidentally made a general review instead of against the lines I had selected) does not work. The two added instructions used different registers (p1 / p2) because the argument we need is in different positions in the two fingerprinted methods.

[oSumAtrIX]

@leumasme Instead of an array you can map the fingerprints to the correct register and then use it in the forEach loop.

[leumasme]

Made it work again and updated the injection method as requested. Should be ready to merge (together with the integrations pr).

[leumasme]

@oSumAtrIX This PR does not work anymore with the changes you added before merging. It currently fails both in apply-patch stage and in app-launch stage.