Added the Back to top button. Issue: #66 #84
Conversation
|
@maitri-vv is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14023932 | Triggered | MongoDB Credentials | 2f92d19 | backend/.env | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/App.css (1)
22-45: Overall implementation of the "Back to top" button stylesThe addition of the
.back-to-top-btnclass andbounceanimation successfully implements the styles for a "Back to top" button, aligning with the PR objective. The button is visually distinct and includes an eye-catching animation.However, there are several areas for improvement:
- Accessibility: Consider adding ARIA attributes and using
prefers-reduced-motion.- Responsiveness: Replace fixed units with relative units for better adaptability.
- Performance: Optimize the animation to reduce potential performance impacts.
By addressing these points, you can create a more robust, accessible, and user-friendly implementation of the "Back to top" button.
Consider creating a separate CSS file for this component (e.g.,
BackToTopButton.css) to improve modularity and maintainability of your styles. This approach aligns with component-based architecture principles and can make it easier to manage styles as your application grows.frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (3)
102-102: LGTM: Addition of autoComplete="off" to name inputThe addition of
autoComplete="off"to the name input field is a good practice for enhancing privacy and ensuring fresh input for each submission. However, consider the trade-off between privacy and user convenience.You might want to consider making this configurable, allowing users to opt-in for autocomplete if they prefer. This could be implemented as a user preference or a prop to the component.
136-136: LGTM: Addition of autoComplete="off" to feedback textareaThe addition of
autoComplete="off"to the feedback textarea is consistent with the changes made to other input fields. For a feedback textarea, this change is less impactful on user experience as autocomplete is not commonly used for such fields.Consider using the
spellcheckattribute for the feedback textarea to enhance user experience. You can addspellcheck="true"to enable spell-checking for the user's feedback.
Line range hint
1-173: Suggestions for improving accessibility and form validationWhile the overall implementation is solid, consider the following improvements:
- Accessibility: Add
aria-labelattributes to form inputs to improve screen reader compatibility.- Form Validation: Implement client-side validation using the
patternattribute or a library like Yup for more robust validation.- Error Handling: Provide more specific error messages for different types of errors (e.g., network error, server error, validation error).
Here's an example of how you could improve the name input:
<input type="text" id="name" value={name} onChange={(e) => setName(e.target.value)} required autoComplete="off" aria-label="Your name" pattern="^[a-zA-Z ]{2,30}$" title="Name should be between 2 and 30 characters and contain only letters and spaces" className="mt-1 block w-full border border-gray-300 rounded-md shadow-sm py-2 px-3 focus:outline-none focus:ring-[#004D43] focus:border-[#004D43]" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.css (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (1)
119-119: Consider the impact on user experience for email fieldThe addition of
autoComplete="off"to the email input is consistent with the change made to the name field. However, for email fields, autocomplete can be particularly useful for users.Consider conducting user testing to evaluate the impact of this change on user experience. You might want to explore alternatives like using
autoComplete="new-email"instead, which suggests a new email address while still allowing for some autocomplete functionality.
frontend/src/App.css
Outdated
| 0%, 100% { | ||
| transform: translateY(0); | ||
| } | ||
| 50% { | ||
| transform: translateY(-10px); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider performance and accessibility implications of the continuous animation
The bounce animation keyframe creates a nice visual effect. However, consider the following points:
-
Performance: Continuous animation can impact performance, especially on low-end devices.
-
User preferences: Some users might find the constant movement distracting.
-
Accessibility: Rapid or constant movement can cause issues for users with vestibular disorders.
Consider these improvements:
- Use
prefers-reduced-motionmedia query to respect user preferences:
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference) {
.back-to-top-btn {
animation: bounce 1s infinite;
}
}- Trigger the animation on hover instead of continuously:
.back-to-top-btn:hover {
animation: bounce 1s infinite;
}- Slow down the animation or reduce the movement to make it less intense:
@keyframes bounce {
0%, 100% {
transform: translateY(0);
}
50% {
- transform: translateY(-10px);
+ transform: translateY(-5px);
}
}These changes will make the button more accessible and less resource-intensive while still maintaining its visual appeal.
frontend/src/App.css
Outdated
| position: fixed; | ||
| bottom: 10px; | ||
| right: 10px; | ||
| padding: 16px; | ||
| background-color: black; | ||
| color: white; | ||
| border-radius: 50%; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| justify-content: center; | ||
| align-items: center; | ||
| box-shadow: 0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2); | ||
| cursor: pointer; | ||
| animation: bounce 1s infinite; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider accessibility and responsiveness improvements for the back-to-top button
The .back-to-top-btn class provides a good foundation for the button's styling. However, consider the following improvements:
-
Accessibility: Add ARIA attributes to improve screen reader support. This should be done in the HTML, not CSS.
-
Responsiveness: Replace fixed pixel values with relative units for better adaptability across different screen sizes.
-
Contrast: Verify that the color contrast meets WCAG standards for accessibility.
Here's a suggested refactor to address responsiveness:
.back-to-top-btn {
position: fixed;
- bottom: 10px;
- right: 10px;
- padding: 16px;
+ bottom: 1rem;
+ right: 1rem;
+ padding: 1rem;
background-color: black;
color: white;
border-radius: 50%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
box-shadow: 0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
cursor: pointer;
animation: bounce 1s infinite;
+ font-size: 1rem; /* Add this line to ensure text scales with button size */
}Also, ensure that the HTML element using this class includes appropriate ARIA attributes, such as aria-label="Back to top".
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .back-to-top-btn { | |
| position: fixed; | |
| bottom: 10px; | |
| right: 10px; | |
| padding: 16px; | |
| background-color: black; | |
| color: white; | |
| border-radius: 50%; | |
| display: flex; | |
| justify-content: center; | |
| align-items: center; | |
| box-shadow: 0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2); | |
| cursor: pointer; | |
| animation: bounce 1s infinite; | |
| } | |
| .back-to-top-btn { | |
| position: fixed; | |
| bottom: 1rem; | |
| right: 1rem; | |
| padding: 1rem; | |
| background-color: black; | |
| color: white; | |
| border-radius: 50%; | |
| display: flex; | |
| justify-content: center; | |
| align-items: center; | |
| box-shadow: 0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2); | |
| cursor: pointer; | |
| animation: bounce 1s infinite; | |
| font-size: 1rem; /* Add this line to ensure text scales with button size */ | |
| } |
frontend/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| return ( | ||
| <div> | ||
| <Navbar /> | ||
| <Outlet /> | ||
| <Footer /> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Render the "Back to Top" button in the JSX
The "Back to Top" button is not currently rendered, so users cannot interact with it.
Include the button in the JSX output by adding the following code inside the <div> wrapper, preferably after the <Footer /> component:
{showButton && (
<button onClick={scrollToTop} className="back-to-top">
Back to Top
</button>
)}Ensure you have appropriate styling for the .back-to-top class in your CSS.
frontend/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| @@ -1,26 +1,35 @@ | |||
| // src/App.js | |||
|
|
|||
| import React from 'react'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Import useState and useEffect from 'react'
The hooks useState and useEffect are used in the component but are not imported, which will result in a ReferenceError.
Apply the following change to fix the imports:
-import React from 'react';
+import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import React from 'react'; | |
| import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; |
frontend/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100; | ||
| setShowButton(isBottom); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the logic for displaying the "Back to Top" button
Currently, the showButton state is set to true when the user is near the bottom of the page. Typically, the "Back to Top" button should appear after the user has scrolled down from the top by a certain amount.
Adjust the logic as follows:
- const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100;
- setShowButton(isBottom);
+ const isScrolledDown = window.scrollY > 300; // Adjust the scroll threshold as needed
+ setShowButton(isScrolledDown);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100; | |
| setShowButton(isBottom); | |
| const isScrolledDown = window.scrollY > 300; // Adjust the scroll threshold as needed | |
| setShowButton(isScrolledDown); |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
|
I have resolved the error and updated the CSS for button Closes Issue: RamakrushnaBiswal#84
|
can u check the updates now.... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/App.jsx (1)
33-50: Great implementation of the "Back to Top" button!The button is well-implemented with conditional rendering, Tailwind CSS styling, and a nice SVG icon. This addresses the previous comments and aligns with the requested styling approach.
For improved accessibility, consider adding an aria-label to the button:
<button onClick={scrollToTop} className="fixed bottom-2 right-2 p-4 bg-black text-white rounded-full flex justify-center items-center shadow-lg cursor-pointer animate-bounce" + aria-label="Scroll back to top" > {/* SVG Arrow */} ... </button>This will help screen reader users understand the button's purpose.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.jsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/App.jsx (2)
3-4: Import statements look good!The changes to import statements are correct. Using relative paths for local components is a good practice. The explicit import of
useStateanduseEffectfrom 'react' addresses a previous issue and follows React best practices.Also applies to: 6-6
Line range hint
1-55: Overall, good implementation with some suggestions for improvementThe changes to the App component look good overall. The "Back to Top" button has been implemented as requested, using Tailwind CSS for styling. Here's a summary of the review:
- Import statements have been corrected and improved.
- State management and useEffect hook are implemented correctly, but the scroll logic could be adjusted for better UX.
- The "Back to Top" button implementation is good, with a minor suggestion for accessibility improvement.
- Clarification is needed regarding the removal of the KindeProvider wrapper.
Please address the suggestions and provide clarification where requested. Once these points are addressed, the changes should be ready for approval.
frontend/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| const [showButton, setShowButton] = useState(false); | ||
|
|
||
| // Show the "Back to Top" button when the user scrolls down | ||
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const handleScroll = () => { | ||
| const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100; | ||
| setShowButton(isBottom); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); | ||
|
|
||
| return () => window.removeEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adjusting the scroll logic for the "Back to Top" button
The current implementation shows the button when the user is near the bottom of the page. Typically, a "Back to Top" button should appear after scrolling down a certain distance from the top, regardless of the page's total length.
Consider modifying the scroll logic as follows:
const handleScroll = () => {
- const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100;
- setShowButton(isBottom);
+ const scrollThreshold = 300; // Adjust this value as needed
+ setShowButton(window.scrollY > scrollThreshold);
};This change will make the button appear after scrolling down 300 pixels from the top, providing a more consistent user experience across different page lengths.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const [showButton, setShowButton] = useState(false); | |
| // Show the "Back to Top" button when the user scrolls down | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const handleScroll = () => { | |
| const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100; | |
| setShowButton(isBottom); | |
| }; | |
| window.addEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); | |
| return () => window.removeEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); | |
| }, []); | |
| const [showButton, setShowButton] = useState(false); | |
| // Show the "Back to Top" button when the user scrolls down | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const handleScroll = () => { | |
| const scrollThreshold = 300; // Adjust this value as needed | |
| setShowButton(window.scrollY > scrollThreshold); | |
| }; | |
| window.addEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); | |
| return () => window.removeEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); | |
| }, []); |
frontend/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| <div> | ||
| <Navbar /> | ||
| <Outlet /> | ||
| <Footer /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining References to KindeAuth Found
There are still references to useKindeAuth in frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx, which might affect authentication functionality due to the removal of KindeProvider.
import { useKindeAuth } from "@kinde-oss/kinde-auth-react";const { login, logout, isAuthenticated } = useKindeAuth();
🔗 Analysis chain
Clarify the removal of KindeProvider
The AI summary mentioned the removal of a KindeProvider wrapper, which is not present in the current code. This simplification might affect authentication or context provision in the app.
Could you please clarify the reasons for removing the KindeProvider? Are there any alternative measures in place to handle authentication or provide necessary context to child components?
To verify the impact, let's check for any remaining references to Kinde in the project:
Please review the results of this search and ensure that the removal of KindeProvider doesn't break any existing functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to Kinde in the project
rg --type js --type jsx 'Kinde|kinde'
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to Kinde in .js and .jsx files
rg 'Kinde|kinde' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx'
Length of output: 244
|
@maitri-vv please don't use css instead that use tailwind css |
Removed css ; added tailwind RamakrushnaBiswal#84
I have added the button according to the UI
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
react-iconsdependency to the latest version.FeedbackFormto disable browser autocomplete for input fields.Bug Fixes