-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Global messages implemented #81
Conversation
@17arindam is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across different files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/package.json (1)
16-16
: Addition of Ant Design (antd) package looks appropriate, but consider a few points.The addition of the "antd" package (version ^5.21.2) aligns well with the PR objective of implementing global messages for login/logout feedback. Ant Design provides robust components for notifications and messages, which can enhance the user experience as described in the PR summary.
However, please consider the following points:
Ensure that you're only using the necessary components from antd to avoid bloating the bundle size. If you're only using the message or notification components, you might want to look into partial imports to optimize performance.
The specified version (^5.21.2) allows for compatible updates. While this is generally good for bug fixes and minor improvements, be aware that it might lead to unexpected changes in the future. Consider if you want to pin to a specific version for more predictable builds.
Check if there are any style conflicts between antd and your existing UI components or Tailwind CSS (which is also in your dependencies). You might need to adjust your global styles or component-specific styles to ensure consistency.
As you're introducing a new UI library, make sure to update your project's documentation to reflect this change and provide guidelines for its usage to maintain consistency across the codebase.
Would you like assistance in setting up partial imports or resolving potential style conflicts?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .gitignore (0 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (2)
60-68
: Handle potential redirect afterlogin()
The
login()
function may cause a page redirect, which means any code afterawait login();
might not execute. If that's the case, displaying a success message afterlogin()
may not be effective. Ensure that the success message is displayed appropriately, possibly after the user returns from the authentication process.You may need to test whether the success message is displayed as intended when placed after
await login();
. If it doesn't display due to redirection, consider handling the success message in theuseEffect
or after the authentication process completes.
5-5
: Verify that 'antd' is installed in your projectImporting
message
fromantd
requires that theantd
library is installed and properly configured in your project. Ensure that you have installedantd
via npm and that it is listed under your project dependencies.Run the following script to check if
antd
is installed:If
antd
is not installed, you can add it using:
useEffect(() => { | ||
// Check when user goes from not authenticated to authenticated | ||
if (!wasAuthenticated && isAuthenticated) { | ||
message.success("Login successful!"); | ||
} | ||
setWasAuthenticated(isAuthenticated); | ||
}, [isAuthenticated, wasAuthenticated]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid unnecessary re-renders in useEffect due to dependency on 'wasAuthenticated'
Including wasAuthenticated
in the dependency array of the useEffect
hook may cause unnecessary re-renders because wasAuthenticated
is updated within the effect. This can lead to the effect running more times than necessary. To prevent this, consider using a useRef
to keep track of the previous authentication state without causing re-renders.
Here's a suggested fix using useRef
:
+import { useRef } from "react";
...
- const [wasAuthenticated, setWasAuthenticated] = useState(false);
+ const wasAuthenticated = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
// Check when user goes from not authenticated to authenticated
- if (!wasAuthenticated && isAuthenticated) {
+ if (!wasAuthenticated.current && isAuthenticated) {
message.success("Login successful!");
}
- setWasAuthenticated(isAuthenticated);
+ wasAuthenticated.current = isAuthenticated;
- }, [isAuthenticated, wasAuthenticated]);
+ }, [isAuthenticated]);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
useEffect(() => { | |
// Check when user goes from not authenticated to authenticated | |
if (!wasAuthenticated && isAuthenticated) { | |
message.success("Login successful!"); | |
} | |
setWasAuthenticated(isAuthenticated); | |
}, [isAuthenticated, wasAuthenticated]); | |
import { useRef } from "react"; | |
const wasAuthenticated = useRef(false); | |
useEffect(() => { | |
// Check when user goes from not authenticated to authenticated | |
if (!wasAuthenticated.current && isAuthenticated) { | |
message.success("Login successful!"); | |
} | |
wasAuthenticated.current = isAuthenticated; | |
}, [isAuthenticated]); |
const handleLogout = async () => { | ||
try { | ||
await logout(); | ||
message.success("Logout successful!"); | ||
} catch (error) { | ||
message.error("Logout failed. Please try again."); | ||
} | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure consistent handling of success messages for login and logout
In handleLogout
, you display a success message immediately after await logout();
, but for the login action, you rely on the useEffect
to display the success message. For consistency and to ensure messages are displayed correctly, consider handling both success messages using the same approach.
Option 1: Move the logout success message to the useEffect
useEffect(() => {
// Check when user goes from authenticated to not authenticated
+ if (wasAuthenticated.current && !isAuthenticated) {
+ message.success("Logout successful!");
+ }
if (!wasAuthenticated.current && isAuthenticated) {
message.success("Login successful!");
}
wasAuthenticated.current = isAuthenticated;
}, [isAuthenticated]);
Option 2: Display the login success message directly in handleLogin
const handleLogin = async () => {
try {
await login();
+ message.success("Login successful!");
} catch (error) {
message.error("Login failed. Please try again.");
}
};
Consider which approach aligns better with your authentication flow and whether login()
or logout()
cause page redirects that may prevent the success messages from displaying.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1)
34-43
: Excellent implementation of authentication state tracking and messaging!The new useEffect hook effectively handles both login and logout scenarios, displaying appropriate success messages. This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives.
Consider adding error message handling within this useEffect for a more comprehensive user feedback system:
useEffect(() => { if (wasAuthenticated.current && !isAuthenticated) { message.success("Logout successful!"); } else if (!wasAuthenticated.current && isAuthenticated) { message.success("Login successful!"); } else if (wasAuthenticated.current === isAuthenticated) { // This could indicate a failed login/logout attempt message.error("Authentication action failed. Please try again."); } wasAuthenticated.current = isAuthenticated; }, [isAuthenticated]);This addition would provide feedback for potential failed authentication attempts.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (5)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statements are correctly updated.The addition of
useRef
andmessage
from antd is consistent with the new features implemented in the component.Also applies to: 5-5
12-12
: Great job addressing the previous review comment!The implementation of
wasAuthenticated
usinguseRef
effectively addresses the issue of unnecessary re-renders that was raised in a previous review. This is the correct approach to track the previous authentication state without causing re-renders.
74-81
: LGTM: handleLogout implementation is correct and consistentThe
handleLogout
function is well-implemented with proper error handling and messaging. It aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of providing user feedback for authentication actions.
111-111
: LGTM: onClick handlers correctly updatedThe onClick handlers for login and logout buttons have been correctly updated to use the new
handleLogin
andhandleLogout
functions. This change is consistent with the overall improvements in authentication handling.Also applies to: 119-119
Line range hint
1-176
: Overall, excellent implementation of global messaging for authentication!The changes in this file effectively implement the PR objectives of adding global messaging for login and logout actions. The use of
useRef
for tracking authentication state and the implementation ofhandleLogin
andhandleLogout
functions greatly improve the user experience.A few minor suggestions have been made to further enhance consistency and error handling. Once these are addressed, the implementation will be robust and user-friendly.
Great work on improving the authentication feedback system!
// Handle login | ||
const handleLogin = async () => { | ||
try { | ||
await login(); | ||
|
||
} catch (error) { | ||
message.error("Login failed. Please try again."); | ||
} | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider moving the login success message to handleLogin
For consistency with handleLogout
, consider moving the success message to the handleLogin
function:
const handleLogin = async () => {
try {
await login();
message.success("Login successful!");
} catch (error) {
message.error("Login failed. Please try again.");
}
};
This change would make the success/error messaging more immediate and consistent between login and logout actions.
@RamakrushnaBiswal please review my pr issue no- #76 |
Feat: Created Feedback Submission System
fixed the contributors readme issue.
replaced the sip & play logo with new playcafe logo
…rrorHandler/backend
…u-toggle enhancement:hamburger menu to toggle to 'X' on mobile
…/backend Error handler/backend using Winston/ logger
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
@17arindam resolve the conflicts |
Fix: Implemented Lazy Loading for Large Images
|
GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14023932 | Triggered | MongoDB Credentials | 6494bc9 | backend/.env | View secret |
14033809 | Triggered | MongoDB Credentials | d5be656 | backend/.env | View secret |
14037887 | Triggered | MongoDB Credentials | ed67389 | backend/.env | View secret |
14037887 | Triggered | MongoDB Credentials | 6494bc9 | backend/.env | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate these secrets.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (28)
frontend/.gitignore (1)
Line range hint
1-31
: Suggestion: Reorganize .gitignore for improved structureWhile the content of the .gitignore file is appropriate, consider reorganizing it for better structure and readability:
- Group related entries together (e.g., all environment files in one section).
- Add comments to explain the purpose of each group of entries.
- Consider alphabetizing entries within each group for easier scanning.
Here's a suggested reorganization:
# Logs logs *.log npm-debug.log* yarn-debug.log* yarn-error.log* pnpm-debug.log* lerna-debug.log* # Dependencies node_modules package-lock.json # Build output dist dist-ssr # Environment variables # Ignore all local environment files to prevent sensitive data from being committed .env .env.local .env.development.local .env.test.local .env.production.local # Editor directories and files .vscode/* !.vscode/extensions.json .idea .DS_Store *.suo *.ntvs* *.njsproj *.sln *.sw? # Misc *.localThis structure groups similar items together and includes explanatory comments, making the file easier to understand and maintain.
.github/workflows/contributors.yml (3)
1-5
: LGTM! Consider optimizing trigger conditions.The workflow trigger configuration is correct and will capture all contributions. However, running on all branches might lead to unnecessary workflow executions.
Consider limiting the trigger to specific branches or events if you want to optimize resource usage. For example:
on: push: branches: - main pull_request: types: [closed]This would run the workflow only on pushes to the main branch and when pull requests are merged.
11-13
: LGTM! Fix indentation for better readability.The permissions are correctly defined for the job's purpose. Granting write permissions to contents and pull requests is necessary for updating the README.
Please fix the indentation of the
permissions
section for better readability and consistency. Apply this diff:permissions: - contents: write - pull-requests: write + contents: write + pull-requests: write🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 12 but found 10
(indentation)
14-18
: LGTM! Add a new line at the end of the file.The step configuration is correct and follows best practices. Using a specific version of the action (
v2.3.10
) ensures consistency, and theGITHUB_TOKEN
secret is correctly used for authentication.Please add a new line at the end of the file to adhere to common file formatting practices. This can be done by adding an empty line after line 18.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware.js (3)
1-2
: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for the logger import.The file structure and import look good. The comment clearly indicates the file's purpose and location, which is helpful for maintainability. The logger import is correctly using a relative path.
Consider adding error handling for the logger import to gracefully handle cases where the logger configuration might not be available:
let logger; try { logger = require("../config/logger"); } catch (error) { console.error("Failed to load logger, using console as fallback:", error); logger = console; }
4-4
: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc for better documentation.The
errorMiddleware
function signature correctly follows Express.js conventions for error-handling middleware. The inclusion of all four parameters (err, req, res, next) is correct, even though 'next' is unused in this implementation.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to improve documentation:
/** * Error handling middleware for Express.js applications. * @param {Error} err - The error object. * @param {import('express').Request} req - The request object. * @param {import('express').Response} res - The response object. * @param {import('express').NextFunction} next - The next middleware function. */ function errorMiddleware(err, req, res, next) { // ... existing code ... }
13-18
: LGTM! Consider adding more detailed error information in non-production environments.The error response logic is well-structured and follows good practices:
- Using the error's status code or defaulting to 500 is correct.
- The response includes a 'success' flag and a message, providing clear feedback.
Consider adding more detailed error information in non-production environments to aid debugging:
res.status(err.status || 500).json({ success: false, message: err.message || "An unexpected error occurred.", ...(process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' && { stack: err.stack, details: err }) });This change would provide more detailed error information during development while keeping production responses concise.
backend/routes/feedbackRouter.js (2)
7-7
: Consider adding error handling to the POST route.The route is correctly defined and uses a separate controller function, which is good for separation of concerns. However, it's recommended to add error handling to this route.
Consider wrapping the controller call in a try-catch block, similar to the GET route:
router.post("/create", async (req, res) => { try { await createFeedback(req, res); } catch (error) { logger.error("Error creating feedback:", { message: error.message, stack: error.stack, }); res.status(500).json({ error: "Internal server error" }); } });
9-19
: LGTM: GET route implementation is solid. Consider setting explicit status code for success.The GET route is well-implemented with proper error handling and logging. The error response correctly avoids revealing sensitive information.
For consistency, consider setting an explicit status code for the success response:
router.get("/", (req, res) => { try { - res.json(apiInfo); + res.status(200).json(apiInfo); } catch (error) { // ... (error handling remains the same) } });backend/config/logger.js (1)
15-18
: Approve transport configuration with suggestions for improvementThe transport configuration is generally good, with console logging for all levels and file logging for errors. However, there are two potential improvements for the file transport:
- Use an absolute path for the error log file to ensure it's always created in the expected location, regardless of where the application is run from.
- Implement log rotation to prevent the error log file from growing indefinitely.
Consider updating the file transport configuration as follows:
const path = require('path'); const { createLogger, format, transports } = require('winston'); require('winston-daily-rotate-file'); // ... (rest of the logger configuration) transports: [ new transports.Console(), new transports.DailyRotateFile({ filename: path.join(__dirname, '../logs/error-%DATE%.log'), datePattern: 'YYYY-MM-DD', level: 'error', maxSize: '20m', maxFiles: '14d' }), ],This configuration uses
winston-daily-rotate-file
to implement log rotation, creates log files with dates in their names, and limits both the size and age of log files.backend/routes/index.js (2)
7-17
: LGTM: Robust error handling for feedbackRouter.The implementation of
feedbackRouter
with a try-catch block and fallback function is well-designed. It provides graceful degradation and proper error logging.Consider adding more specific error information in the fallback response:
feedbackRouter = (req, res) => { res .status(500) - .json({ error: "Feedback functionality is currently unavailable" }); + .json({ + error: "Feedback functionality is currently unavailable", + details: "An error occurred while loading the feedback module. Please try again later." + }); };This provides more context to the client about the nature of the error.
28-28
: LGTM: Root endpoint documentation updated.The feedback endpoint is correctly added to the root endpoint documentation, maintaining consistency with the actual routes.
Consider adding a brief description of the feedback endpoint functionality:
endpoints: { Reservation: "/reservation", - Feedback: "/feedback", // Added feedback endpoint documentation + Feedback: { + path: "/feedback", + description: "Endpoint for submitting and managing user feedback" + }, },This provides more informative documentation for API users.
backend/index.js (3)
4-6
: Good additions for improved logging and error handling.The new imports for logger and error middleware align well with best practices for server-side applications. This will enhance the application's ability to log important events and handle errors consistently.
Consider grouping related imports together. For example, you could move the
dotenv
import next to other configuration-related imports if there are any.
28-28
: Improved logging for MongoDB connection.Replacing console.log with logger methods is a great improvement. It provides better control over log levels and formats, which is crucial for production environments.
For the error logging, consider including the full error object instead of just the message. This can be done by passing the entire error object to the logger:
logger.error("Database connection failed:", error);This will provide more context (like the stack trace) in case of connection failures.
Also applies to: 31-31
38-41
: Excellent addition of a health check endpoint.The health check endpoint is a valuable addition for monitoring the application's status. This is crucial for production environments, especially when using container orchestration or load balancing systems.
Consider enhancing the health check to include more meaningful information:
app.get("/health", (req, res) => { res.status(200).json({ status: "OK", timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), uptime: process.uptime() }); });This provides more context about when the health check was performed and how long the server has been running.
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (2)
36-41
: Great job: Enhanced exception logging implemented.The new logging implementation for exceptions during reservation creation is comprehensive and well-structured. It includes the error message, stack trace, and request body, which will significantly improve debugging capabilities.
Consider removing the empty line 41 to maintain consistent spacing throughout the file.
Missing Implementation: Global Messaging Feature Not Present
The PR introduces enhanced server-side logging, which is beneficial for debugging and error tracking. However, the primary objective of implementing global messages for user feedback (e.g., success messages for actions like login/logout) is not addressed in the current changes.
Action Required:
- Implement the client-side global messaging functionality to align with the PR objectives.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-52
: Clarification needed: Discrepancy between PR objectives and implemented changes.The changes in this file focus on improving server-side logging, which is a valuable addition. However, the PR objectives mention implementing global messages for user feedback (e.g., success messages for login/logout). The current changes don't appear to address this client-side functionality.
Could you clarify if the global messaging feature is implemented in other files not included in this review? If not, additional changes may be needed to fulfill the PR objectives.
To verify if the global messaging feature is implemented elsewhere, we can search for relevant code:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for global messaging implementation echo "Searching for global messaging implementation..." rg -i -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx "(global|success|error)\s*(message|notification)"Length of output: 218
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for global messaging implementation without using unsupported file types echo "Searching for global messaging implementation..." rg -i -t js -t ts -t tsx "(global|success|error)\s*(message|notification)"Length of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for global messaging implementation without unsupported file types echo "Searching for global messaging implementation..." rg -i -t js -t ts "(global|success|error)\s*(message|notification)"Length of output: 437
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for global messaging implementation with expanded patterns echo "Searching for global messaging implementation with expanded patterns..." rg -i -t js -t ts "(global|success|error|toast|alert|notifier|notificationService)\s*(message|notification|toast|alert)"Length of output: 536
backend/models/feedback.model.js (1)
5-38
: LGTM: Well-structured schema with appropriate validations.The schema is well-defined with proper validations for each field. However, consider using a more robust email validation method.
Consider using the
validator.isEmail()
function for email validation instead of a regex pattern. This can provide more comprehensive and up-to-date email validation. Here's how you can modify the email field:email: { type: String, required: true, trim: true, lowercase: true, maxlength: [255, "Email cannot be more than 255 characters"], - match: [ - /^\w+([.-]?\w+)*@\w+([.-]?\w+)*(\.\w{2,3})+$/, - "Please fill a valid email address", - ], + validate: [validator.isEmail, 'Please fill a valid email address'], },This change will use the
isEmail()
function from the validator library, which is more robust and easier to maintain.backend/controller/feedback.controller.js (3)
1-10
: LGTM! Consider adding more specific error messages.The imports and Zod schema definition look good. Using Zod for validation is a great choice for ensuring data integrity.
Consider adding more specific error messages to the Zod schema for better user feedback. For example:
const feedbackSchema = z.object({ name: z.string().min(2, "Name must be at least 2 characters long").max(100, "Name cannot exceed 100 characters"), email: z.string().email("Invalid email format"), feedback: z.string().min(10, "Feedback must be at least 10 characters long"), });
12-42
: Good implementation. Consider some enhancements for robustness.The
createFeedback
function is well-structured with proper validation, error handling, and use of HTTP status codes.Consider the following enhancements:
- Use a more specific error type for database errors:
} catch (error) { logger.error("Error creating feedback:", error); if (error.name === 'MongoError' || error.name === 'ValidationError') { return res.status(400).json({ success: false, message: "Invalid data provided", }); } res.status(500).json({ success: false, message: "An error occurred while creating the feedback", }); }
- Consider adding input sanitization to prevent XSS attacks:
const sanitizedData = { name: validationResult.data.name.trim(), email: validationResult.data.email.trim().toLowerCase(), feedback: validationResult.data.feedback.trim(), }; const feedback = await Feedback.create(sanitizedData);
- Implement rate limiting to prevent abuse of the feedback system.
48-53
: Consider moving the dummy API call to documentation or tests.While the dummy API call provides a helpful example of the expected input format, it's generally not recommended to keep commented-out code in production files.
Consider moving this information to:
- API documentation (e.g., Swagger or README file)
- A separate test file for the
createFeedback
function- A code comment above the
feedbackSchema
definition, describing the expected structureThis will keep the main code file clean while still preserving the useful information for developers.
frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Content.jsx (1)
31-31
: LGTM: Logo styling updated appropriatelyThe logo styling has been updated to increase its size and remove the white background and padding. These changes are consistent with updating the visual presentation of the logo and likely accommodate the new 'playcafe.png' image.
Consider adding an
aria-label
to the img element for improved accessibility. For example:<img className="w-24 bg-transparent p-0 rounded-3xl h-24" alt="logo" + aria-label="PlayCafe logo" src={Logo} />
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1)
34-43
: LGTM: Authentication state changes are handled correctly.The useEffect hook properly manages authentication state changes and displays appropriate success messages. This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives.
For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
wasAuthenticated.current
:// wasAuthenticated.current represents the previous authentication state
frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx (1)
60-60
: Consider maintaining consistency in quote usage.The change from double quotes to single quotes in the reviews array is noted. While this doesn't affect functionality, it's generally good practice to maintain consistency in quote usage throughout the codebase. Consider reviewing the project's style guide or discussing with the team to establish a consistent convention for quote usage.
README.md (2)
Line range hint
87-207
: Great addition of the "Our Contributors" section!The new "Our Contributors" section is a fantastic addition to the README. It effectively showcases the project's contributors and adds a personal touch to the documentation.
Consider using Markdown tables instead of HTML for better raw readability. For example:
| [![RamakrushnaBiswal](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/125277258?v=4&s=100)](https://github.com/RamakrushnaBiswal)<br>[Ramakrushna Biswal](https://github.com/RamakrushnaBiswal) | [![samar12-rad](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/128586929?v=4&s=100)](https://github.com/samar12-rad)<br>[Samarth Vaidya](https://github.com/samar12-rad) | |:---:|:---:|This approach maintains the visual appeal while improving the raw Markdown readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
91-91: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
92-92: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
135-135: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
136-136: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
179-179: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
180-180: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
195-195: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
196-196: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
91-196
: Consider addressing Markdownlint warnings about hard tabsMarkdownlint has flagged the use of hard tabs in the HTML table structure. While this isn't a critical issue, especially within HTML blocks, it's worth considering for consistency across the document.
If you decide to address this:
- Replace hard tabs with spaces in the HTML structure.
- Ensure the visual structure of the table is maintained after the change.
Alternatively, you can add a Markdownlint configuration file to ignore this rule for HTML blocks if you prefer to keep the current structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
91-91: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
92-92: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
135-135: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
136-136: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
179-179: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
180-180: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
195-195: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
196-196: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (1)
31-38
: LGTM: LazyLoadImage implementation with minor suggestion.The LazyLoadImage component is well-implemented, replacing the previous background image. This change will improve page load performance by lazy-loading the image. The use of the 'blur' effect and transition delay provides a smooth loading experience.
Consider adding a placeholder or low-resolution image using the
placeholderSrc
prop for an even better user experience during loading.frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (1)
24-27
: Clear previous error messages when resubmitting the formCurrently, if there's an error and the user resubmits the form, the previous error message remains visible. Consider clearing the error state before initiating a new submission to enhance user experience.
Apply this diff to clear the error state at the beginning of
handleSubmit
:const handleSubmit = async (e) => { e.preventDefault(); + setError(null); setIsLoading(true);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/src/assets/Logo/playcafe.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- .github/workflows/contributors.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- backend/config/api.info.js (1 hunks)
- backend/config/logger.js (1 hunks)
- backend/controller/feedback.controller.js (1 hunks)
- backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (3 hunks)
- backend/index.js (2 hunks)
- backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware.js (1 hunks)
- backend/models/feedback.model.js (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- backend/routes/feedbackRouter.js (1 hunks)
- backend/routes/index.js (1 hunks)
- frontend/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (7 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Content.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/ui/Landing.jsx (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/contributors.yml
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 12 but found 10
(indentation)
[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
91-91: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
92-92: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
135-135: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
136-136: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
179-179: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
180-180: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
195-195: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
196-196: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🪛 Biome
backend/models/feedback.model.js
[error] 41-41: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
🔇 Additional comments (44)
frontend/.gitignore (1)
26-30
: LGTM: Good addition of environment file entriesThe addition of
.env.local
,.env.development.local
,.env.test.local
, and.env.production.local
to the .gitignore file is a good practice. This ensures that environment-specific configuration files are not accidentally committed to version control, which helps maintain security and allows for different configurations across various development environments.backend/config/api.info.js (1)
1-16
: Good structure, but some improvements suggestedThe API configuration is well-structured and provides clear information about the feedback endpoint. Here are some observations and suggestions:
The version number "1.0.0" is appropriately specific, following semantic versioning principles.
The endpoint parameters for creating feedback are well-defined with types and required flags. This is good practice for clear API documentation.
Including a documentation URL is beneficial for API users. However, the current URL appears to be a placeholder.
- documentation: "https://api-docs-url.com", + documentation: "https://actual-documentation-url.com",Consider adding more parameters to the feedback creation endpoint for better categorization and filtering of feedback.
parameters: { name: { type: "string", required: true }, email: { type: "string", required: true }, message: { type: "string", required: true }, + subject: { type: "string", required: false }, + category: { type: "string", required: false, enum: ["bug", "feature", "other"] }, },The configuration doesn't specify the response format or potential error responses. Adding this information would make the API more predictable for consumers.
createFeedback: { path: "/create", method: "POST", parameters: { // ... existing parameters ... }, + responses: { + 200: { description: "Feedback created successfully", type: "object", properties: { id: { type: "string" } } }, + 400: { description: "Invalid input", type: "object", properties: { error: { type: "string" } } }, + 500: { description: "Server error", type: "object", properties: { error: { type: "string" } } } + } },For security, ensure that email validation is implemented server-side, and consider implementing rate limiting for the feedback creation endpoint to prevent abuse.
To ensure email validation is properly implemented, run the following script:
This will help identify if email validation is being performed in the codebase. If no results are found, it's crucial to implement proper email validation to enhance security.
.github/workflows/contributors.yml (2)
7-10
: LGTM! Job configuration is well-defined.The job configuration is correct and follows best practices. Using the latest Ubuntu runner ensures up-to-date dependencies, and the job name clearly describes its purpose.
1-18
: Overall, great implementation with minor improvements needed.The contributors workflow is well-structured and follows GitHub Actions best practices. It effectively automates the management of contributor information in the README file. To further improve the workflow:
- Consider optimizing the trigger conditions to reduce unnecessary workflow runs.
- Fix the indentation in the permissions section.
- Add a new line at the end of the file.
Addressing these minor issues will enhance readability and adhere to common conventions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 12 but found 10
(indentation)
[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
backend/package.json (1)
19-20
: LGTM! Please clarify the intended use of new dependencies.The addition of
validator
(^13.12.0) andwinston
(^3.14.2) to the project dependencies is a good choice. Both are well-maintained libraries that can significantly improve the robustness of the application.
validator
is excellent for string validation and sanitization, which can enhance input validation and security.winston
is a powerful logging library that can help with implementing better logging practices, potentially supporting the global messaging functionality mentioned in the PR objectives.Could you please provide more context on how these libraries will be utilized in the project, particularly in relation to the global messaging feature described in the PR objectives?
To ensure these dependencies are being used effectively, I'd like to check their usage in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The dependencies
validator
andwinston
are actively used in the codebase.
validator
is used inbackend/models/feedback.model.js
for input validation.winston
is used inbackend/config/logger.js
for logging purposes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of new dependencies in the codebase echo "Checking usage of 'validator':" rg --type js 'require\s*\(\s*["\']validator["\']' || echo "No usage found" echo -e "\nChecking usage of 'winston':" rg --type js 'require\s*\(\s*["\']winston["\']' || echo "No usage found"Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of new dependencies in the codebase echo "Checking usage of 'validator':" rg --type js 'require\s*\(\s*["\']validator["\']' || echo "No usage found" echo -e "\nChecking usage of 'winston':" rg --type js 'require\s*\(\s*["\']winston["\']' || echo "No usage found"Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of new dependencies in the codebase echo "Checking usage of 'validator':" rg --type js "require\s*\(\s*['\"]validator['\"]\)" || echo "No usage found" echo -e "\nChecking usage of 'winston':" rg --type js "require\s*\(\s*['\"]winston['\"]\)" || echo "No usage found"Length of output: 404
backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware.js (2)
20-20
: LGTM! The export is correctly implemented.The errorMiddleware function is properly exported, allowing it to be imported and used in other parts of the application.
5-11
:⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect stack assignment and consider security implications of logging request body.
The error logging is comprehensive, which is good for debugging. However, there are two issues to address:
- The 'stack' property is incorrectly set to
req.body
instead oferr.stack
.- Logging the entire request body may pose security risks if it contains sensitive information.
Please apply the following changes:
logger.error(err.message, { - stack: req.body, // Include stack trace + stack: err.stack, // Include stack trace url: req.originalUrl, // Request URL method: req.method, // HTTP method - body: req.body, // Request body + body: '(request body omitted for security)', // Omit request body });Consider implementing a function to sanitize the request body before logging, removing sensitive fields like passwords or tokens.
To ensure no sensitive data is being logged elsewhere, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Issues confirmed with stack assignment and request body logging.
- The
stack
property is incorrectly set toreq.body
instead oferr.stack
.- Logging the entire request body can expose sensitive information.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for instances of logging request bodies rg --type js 'log.*req\.body'Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for instances of logger.error logging req.body rg --type js 'logger\.error\(.*req\.body.*\)' # Alternatively, use ast-grep to find logger.error calls with req.body ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'logger.error($_)' | grep 'req.body'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for instances of logger logging req.body with various log levels rg --type js 'logger\.(error|warn|info|debug)\(.*req\.body.*\)' # Alternatively, use ast-grep to find any logger method calls with req.body ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'logger.$(error|warn|info|debug)($_)' | grep 'req\.body'Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for incorrect 'stack: req.body' assignments in JavaScript files rg --type js 'stack\s*:\s*req\.body'Length of output: 122
backend/routes/feedbackRouter.js (3)
1-5
: LGTM: Imports and router initialization are correct.The necessary modules are imported, and the Express router is properly initialized. The comment on the logger import adds clarity.
21-21
: LGTM: Router export is correct.The router is properly exported, allowing it to be used in other parts of the application.
1-21
: Overall, the feedback router implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objectives.This new file implements a feedback router that could be part of the system for displaying success or error messages, as mentioned in the PR objectives. The implementation follows good practices such as separation of concerns and error handling.
A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Adding error handling to the POST route.
- Setting an explicit status code for the success response in the GET route.
These changes will enhance the robustness and consistency of the feedback system, contributing to a better user experience when displaying global messages for login/logout actions.
backend/config/logger.js (2)
1-5
: LGTM: Proper setup of Winston loggerThe Winston library is correctly imported and the logger is created with an appropriate default logging level of "info". This configuration provides a good balance between capturing important information and avoiding excessive logging.
21-21
: LGTM: Proper export of logger instanceThe configured logger instance is correctly exported, allowing other modules to import and use it. This promotes consistent logging across the application.
backend/routes/index.js (3)
3-3
: LGTM: Logger import added correctly.The Winston logger import is correctly placed and follows good practices by using a separate configuration file.
19-19
: LGTM: Feedback route added correctly.The feedback route is properly set up using the Express
use
method with the appropriate path.
Line range hint
1-34
: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and align with PR objectives.The implementation of the feedback router with robust error handling, along with the documentation updates, contributes to the global messaging functionality described in the PR objectives. The changes improve both the user experience and the maintainability of the code.
A few minor suggestions have been made to further enhance the error information and API documentation. These changes, while not critical, could provide additional value to both developers and API users.
To ensure the changes align with the PR objectives, particularly the display of success and error messages for login/logout, we should verify the implementation in the frontend code. Run the following script to check for relevant changes:
This will help confirm that the frontend changes necessary to display the messages described in the PR objectives have been implemented.
frontend/package.json (2)
27-27
: New dependency added: react-lazy-load-image-componentThe addition of react-lazy-load-image-component is a good optimization for image loading in React applications. This library helps with lazy loading images, which can improve initial page load times.
To ensure this addition is being utilized effectively, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of react-lazy-load-image-component in the project # Test: Search for react-lazy-load-image-component imports in the project echo "Searching for react-lazy-load-image-component imports:" rg --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx 'from\s+[\'"]react-lazy-load-image-component[\'"]' # Test: Check for usage of LazyLoadImage component echo "Checking for LazyLoadImage component usage:" rg --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx '<LazyLoadImage'This script will help us verify that the react-lazy-load-image-component is being imported and used in the project.
16-16
: New dependency added: antdThe addition of the Ant Design library (antd) is a significant change to the project. Ant Design is a popular UI component library for React applications.
To ensure this addition is intentional and its usage is implemented correctly, please run the following verification script:
This script will help us verify that antd components are being used in the project and that the necessary CSS is imported.
backend/index.js (3)
8-8
: Correct placement of dotenv configuration.The
dotenv.config()
call is correctly placed at the beginning of the file, ensuring that environment variables are loaded before they're used in the application.
43-43
: Proper integration of error middleware.The addition of error middleware is a great practice for centralized error handling. Its placement after the routes but before starting the server ensures that it can catch errors from all routes.
46-46
: Consistent use of logger for server start.Replacing console.log with logger.info for server start is consistent with the other logging improvements. This ensures that all important server events are logged through the same centralized system.
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (2)
3-3
: LGTM: Logger import added correctly.The logger import is appropriately placed and consistent with the changes to implement logging throughout the file.
17-20
: Excellent: Improved validation error logging.The new logging implementation for validation errors is well-structured and informative. It includes both the validation errors and the request body, which will greatly aid in debugging and error tracking.
backend/models/feedback.model.js (4)
1-3
: LGTM: Imports are correctly defined.The necessary modules (mongoose, Schema, and validator) are properly imported for schema definition and validation.
40-45
: LGTM: Proper input sanitization in pre-save middleware.The pre-save middleware correctly sanitizes the name and feedback fields to prevent potential XSS attacks. The use of a regular function instead of an arrow function is appropriate here, as we need access to the correct
this
context.Ignore the static analysis hint suggesting to use an arrow function. In this case, a regular function is necessary to maintain the correct
this
binding.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 41-41: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
47-51
: LGTM: Model creation and export are correctly implemented.The Feedback model is properly created using the defined schema and exported correctly. The export style allows for easy addition of more models in the future if needed.
1-51
: Overall, excellent implementation of the Feedback model.This new file aligns well with the PR objectives by providing a robust structure for handling user feedback, which can be used in conjunction with the global messaging system. The schema is well-defined with appropriate validations and sanitization measures. The suggested improvement for email validation is minor and doesn't detract from the overall quality of the implementation.
Great job on creating a secure and well-structured model for handling feedback!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 41-41: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
backend/controller/feedback.controller.js (1)
44-46
: LGTM! Proper module exports.The module exports are correctly implemented, exporting only the necessary
createFeedback
function. This follows the principle of least privilege and keeps the module's interface clean.frontend/src/components/ui/Landing.jsx (5)
6-7
: Excellent addition of lazy loading for images!The introduction of
LazyLoadImage
andtrackWindowScroll
fromreact-lazy-load-image-component
is a great performance optimization. This will help improve page load times, especially for users with slower internet connections. The blur effect CSS import also enhances the user experience during image loading.
9-9
: Good adjustment to the Landing function declaration.Removing the
export default
from the function declaration is appropriate here. This change allows for wrapping the component withtrackWindowScroll
before exporting, which is necessary for implementing the lazy loading functionality.
Line range hint
16-32
: Improved code formatting in useEffect hook.The formatting changes in the useEffect hook enhance code readability without altering the functionality. The consistent indentation and line breaks make the animation logic using gsap easier to follow.
82-82
: Excellent implementation of trackWindowScroll.Wrapping the Landing component with
trackWindowScroll
before exporting is the correct way to implement the lazy loading functionality. This higher-order component will track the window scroll position, allowing for more efficient lazy loading of images throughout the entire Landing component.
Line range hint
1-82
: Summary: Excellent implementation of global messaging and performance enhancements.This PR successfully implements the global messaging functionality as described in the PR objectives. The changes in this file focus on performance improvements and visual enhancements, which, while not directly related to the global messaging, contribute to an overall better user experience.
The implementation of lazy loading for images will significantly improve page load times, especially for users with slower internet connections. The visual enhancements, such as the blur effect during image loading, provide a smoother user experience.
These changes align well with the overall goal of improving the application's functionality and user interface. Great work on enhancing both the performance and visual aspects of the Landing component!
frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Content.jsx (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Logo import updated correctlyThe logo import has been updated from 'logo.png' to 'playcafe.png', which is consistent with the application name and likely reflects the new branding. This change aligns with the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-138
: Summary: Logo update successfully implementedThe changes in this file successfully update the logo image and its styling. The new logo ('playcafe.png') is now being used, and its presentation has been adjusted with increased dimensions and a transparent background. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of implementing global messaging, as they contribute to the overall visual update of the application.
The changes are minimal and focused, with no apparent issues. They should improve the visual consistency of the application's branding.
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (5)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate for the new functionality.The added imports for
useRef
andmessage
are consistent with the new features implemented in this component.Also applies to: 5-5
12-12
: Great job addressing the previous review comment!The use of
useRef
forwasAuthenticated
is an excellent solution to prevent unnecessary re-renders, as suggested in the previous review. This change improves the component's performance.
111-111
: LGTM: onClick handlers updated correctly.The onClick handlers for both login and logout buttons have been properly updated to use the new
handleLogin
andhandleLogout
functions. This change ensures that the new authentication handling logic is correctly integrated into the UI.Also applies to: 119-119
161-161
: LGTM: Mobile menu onClick handlers updated consistently.The onClick handlers for both login and logout buttons in the mobile menu have been correctly updated to use the new
handleLogin
andhandleLogout
functions. This change maintains consistency with the desktop menu implementation, ensuring uniform behavior across different screen sizes.Also applies to: 169-169
63-71
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider moving the login success message here for consistency.
For consistency with the
handleLogout
function and to ensure immediate feedback, consider moving the success message into this function:const handleLogin = async () => { try { await login(); message.success("Login successful!"); } catch (error) { message.error("Login failed. Please try again."); } };This change would make the success/error messaging more immediate and consistent between login and logout actions.
frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx (2)
1-4
: Excellent addition of LazyLoadImage for performance optimization!The introduction of
LazyLoadImage
fromreact-lazy-load-image-component
and its associated blur effect CSS is a great improvement. This change will enhance the image loading experience and potentially improve the overall performance of the component.
91-91
: Good addition of updateCardsToShow in useEffect.Calling
updateCardsToShow()
within theuseEffect
hook is a good practice. This ensures that the number of cards shown is correctly set on both the initial render and subsequent window resizes, improving the component's responsiveness.README.md (1)
86-86
: Approved: Good addition to encourage repository engagementThe addition of "Make sure you show some love by giving ⭐ to our repository" is a nice touch to encourage user engagement with the project.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2)
12-13
: LGTM: New imports for LazyLoadImage.The new imports for LazyLoadImage and its CSS are correctly implemented. This addition will enable lazy loading of images, which can improve the page's performance.
Line range hint
1-242
: Summary: Good improvements with opportunities for further enhancement.The implementation of LazyLoadImage for the background image is a positive change that will improve page load performance. The component structure is generally sound, but there are opportunities for improvement:
- Consider using the
placeholderSrc
prop in LazyLoadImage for better UX during loading.- Refactor the repeated board game sections into a separate component for better maintainability.
- Correct the duplicate content for some board games (Azul entries).
These changes will result in more maintainable, efficient, and accurate code. Overall, the modifications are a step in the right direction for optimizing the Boardgame component.
.env.development.local | ||
.env.test.local | ||
.env.production.local | ||
.env |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove duplicate .env entry
The .env
entry on line 31 is a duplicate of the existing entry on line 13. To maintain a clean and efficient .gitignore file, it's recommended to remove this redundant line.
Apply this change:
.env.development.local
.env.test.local
.env.production.local
-.env
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
format: winston.format.combine( | ||
winston.format.timestamp(), // Include a timestamp | ||
winston.format.colorize(), // Colorize the output | ||
winston.format.printf(({ timestamp, level, message, stack, errors }) => { | ||
return `${timestamp} [${level}] ${message}${ | ||
stack ? `\nStack: ${stack}` : "" | ||
}${errors ? `\nErrors: ${JSON.stringify(errors)}` : ""}`; // Custom format | ||
}) | ||
), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approve format configuration with a suggestion for error serialization
The logger format is well-configured, combining timestamp, colorization, and a custom print format that includes comprehensive information. This setup enhances log readability and provides valuable debugging information.
However, there's a potential issue with error serialization:
On line 12, JSON.stringify(errors)
might throw an exception if errors
contains circular references. Consider using a safer serialization method:
- }${errors ? `\nErrors: ${JSON.stringify(errors)}` : ""}`; // Custom format
+ }${errors ? `\nErrors: ${JSON.stringify(errors, Object.getOwnPropertyNames(errors))}` : ""}`; // Custom format
This change ensures that all properties of the error object are serialized, including non-enumerable ones, and handles circular references gracefully.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
format: winston.format.combine( | |
winston.format.timestamp(), // Include a timestamp | |
winston.format.colorize(), // Colorize the output | |
winston.format.printf(({ timestamp, level, message, stack, errors }) => { | |
return `${timestamp} [${level}] ${message}${ | |
stack ? `\nStack: ${stack}` : "" | |
}${errors ? `\nErrors: ${JSON.stringify(errors)}` : ""}`; // Custom format | |
}) | |
), | |
format: winston.format.combine( | |
winston.format.timestamp(), // Include a timestamp | |
winston.format.colorize(), // Colorize the output | |
winston.format.printf(({ timestamp, level, message, stack, errors }) => { | |
return `${timestamp} [${level}] ${message}${ | |
stack ? `\nStack: ${stack}` : "" | |
}${errors ? `\nErrors: ${JSON.stringify(errors, Object.getOwnPropertyNames(errors))}` : ""}`; // Custom format | |
}) | |
), |
// config/logger.js | ||
const winston = require("winston"); | ||
|
||
const logger = winston.createLogger({ | ||
level: "info", // Set the default logging level | ||
format: winston.format.combine( | ||
winston.format.timestamp(), // Include a timestamp | ||
winston.format.colorize(), // Colorize the output | ||
winston.format.printf(({ timestamp, level, message, stack, errors }) => { | ||
return `${timestamp} [${level}] ${message}${ | ||
stack ? `\nStack: ${stack}` : "" | ||
}${errors ? `\nErrors: ${JSON.stringify(errors)}` : ""}`; // Custom format | ||
}) | ||
), | ||
transports: [ | ||
new winston.transports.Console(), // Log to console | ||
new winston.transports.File({ filename: "error.log", level: "error" }), // Log errors to a file | ||
], | ||
}); | ||
|
||
module.exports = logger; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Console.log Statements Detected in Frontend Code
The following console.log
statements remain in the frontend codebase and should be replaced with the configured logging utility to ensure consistency and maintainability:
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx
- Line with
console.log(guests);
- Line with
console.log(time);
- Line with
console.log(date);
- Line with
// console.log(import.meta.env.VITE_BACKEND_URL);
- Line with
.then((data) => console.log(data))
- Line with
.catch((error) => console.log(error));
- Line with
Please update these instances to use the custom logger or an appropriate logging mechanism as per the project's standards.
🔗 Analysis chain
Overall: Well-implemented logging utility with minor improvement suggestions
The logging utility is well-implemented using the Winston library. It provides comprehensive logging capabilities with appropriate formatting and transport configuration. The suggested improvements for error serialization and file transport will further enhance its robustness and maintainability.
To ensure the logger is being used consistently across the application, please run the following script:
This script will help identify where the logger is being imported and used, as well as any remaining console.log
statements that should be replaced with the custom logger.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the custom logger across the application
# Test: Search for logger import and usage
echo "Checking logger import and usage:"
rg --type js "const\s+(\w+)\s*=\s*require\(['\"]\.\.?/config/logger['\"]" -g '!config/logger.js'
# Test: Check for any remaining console.log statements that should be replaced with the custom logger
echo "Checking for console.log statements:"
rg --type js "console\.log" -g '!config/logger.js'
Length of output: 1407
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ | |||
"@kinde-oss/kinde-auth-react": "^4.0.4", | |||
"@splidejs/splide": "^4.1.4", | |||
"@splidejs/splide-extension-auto-scroll": "^0.5.3", | |||
"antd": "^5.21.2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Add Build Stats Generation and Bundle Analysis Tools
To effectively monitor and manage the bundle size impact of new dependencies like "antd", please implement the following:
-
Add a build script that generates stats:
"build:stats": "vite build --mode production --outDir dist-stats"
-
Add a bundle analysis tool:
"analyze": "vite-bundle-analyzer"
These additions will help in tracking and optimizing the bundle size, ensuring that new dependencies do not negatively affect the application's load times.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify impact on bundle size
The addition of new dependencies may impact the overall bundle size of the application. It's important to ensure that these additions don't significantly increase the bundle size, which could affect load times.
To assess the impact on bundle size, please run the following script:
This script checks for existing build and analysis scripts, and provides suggestions if they're not present. Implementing these suggestions will help in monitoring and managing the bundle size as new dependencies are added.
Also applies to: 27-27
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the impact of new dependencies on bundle size
# Test: Check if there's a build script that generates stats
echo "Checking for a build script that generates stats:"
grep '"build"' package.json | grep 'stats'
# Test: If no stats script exists, suggest adding one
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Consider adding a build script that generates stats. For example:"
echo '"build:stats": "vite build --mode production --outDir dist-stats"'
fi
# Test: Check if there's an existing bundle analysis tool
echo "Checking for existing bundle analysis tools:"
grep -E '"analyze"|"bundle-analyzer"' package.json
# Test: If no analysis tool exists, suggest adding one
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Consider adding a bundle analysis tool. For example:"
echo '"analyze": "vite-bundle-analyzer"'
fi
# Note: Actual bundle size analysis would require building the project,
# which is beyond the scope of this script.
Length of output: 905
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the impact of new dependencies on bundle size
# Test: Check if there's a build script that generates stats in frontend/package.json
echo "Checking for a build script that generates stats in frontend/package.json:"
grep '"build"' frontend/package.json | grep 'stats'
# Test: If no stats script exists, suggest adding one
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Consider adding a build script that generates stats. For example:"
echo '"build:stats": "vite build --mode production --outDir dist-stats"'
fi
# Test: Check if there's an existing bundle analysis tool in frontend/package.json
echo "Checking for existing bundle analysis tools in frontend/package.json:"
grep -E '"analyze"|"bundle-analyzer"' frontend/package.json
# Test: If no analysis tool exists, suggest adding one
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Consider adding a bundle analysis tool. For example:"
echo '"analyze": "vite-bundle-analyzer"'
fi
# Note: Actual bundle size analysis would require building the project,
# which is beyond the scope of this script.
Length of output: 931
<div className="absolute flex justify-center md:w-2/4 md:left-2/4 rotate-12 -bottom-20 items-center"> | ||
<img src={heropic} alt="" className="w-2/4" /> | ||
</div> | ||
|
||
<div className="absolute flex justify-center md:w-2/4 md:left-2/4 -rotate-12 -bottom-16"> | ||
<img src={heropic} alt="" className="w-2/4" /> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</section> | ||
|
||
|
||
<section className="flex flex-row justify-center items-center p-32"> | ||
{/* <div className="w-3/5 p-28 mt-20"> | ||
<h1 className="text-8xl font-bold text-black "> | ||
Our name says it all! | ||
</h1> | ||
<p className="text-black text-2xl"> | ||
Founder, Jonathan Li, shares a passion for board games, boba, and | ||
delicious food, so he combined them all to become Sip & Play, Park | ||
Slope’s first board game cafe. It is a straightforward concept: come | ||
in with your friends and family to play any board game from our | ||
library of 300+ games! We hope when you visit, you also enjoy our | ||
coffee, espresso, boba, sandwiches, and snacks! | ||
</p> | ||
<ul className="text-xl mt-4"> | ||
<li>New opening hours:</li> | ||
<li>Sunday: 10am-11pm</li> | ||
<li>Mon-Thurs: 11am-11pm</li> | ||
<li>Fri: 11am-midnight</li> | ||
<li>Sat: 10am-midnight</li> | ||
</ul> | ||
<button className="p-2 border-2 border-slate-500">Learn more↗️</button> | ||
</div> */} | ||
|
||
|
||
<div className="w-1/2 absolute p-4 md:right-40 m-auto"> | ||
<img src={coffecup} alt="" className="w-96 rotate-12"/> | ||
<LazyLoadImage | ||
alt={"image.alt"} | ||
effect="blur" | ||
wrapperProps={{ | ||
style: { transitionDelay: "1s" }, | ||
}} | ||
className="w-96 rotate-12" | ||
src={coffecup} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great use of LazyLoadImage, but improve alt text.
The implementation of LazyLoadImage for the coffee cup image is excellent and aligns well with the performance optimizations introduced earlier. The blur effect and transition delay will enhance the user experience during loading.
However, the alt text "image.alt" is not descriptive.
Please update the alt text to be more descriptive, such as:
- alt={"image.alt"}
+ alt={"Coffee cup"}
This change will improve accessibility for users relying on screen readers.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<div className="absolute flex justify-center md:w-2/4 md:left-2/4 rotate-12 -bottom-20 items-center"> | |
<img src={heropic} alt="" className="w-2/4" /> | |
</div> | |
<div className="absolute flex justify-center md:w-2/4 md:left-2/4 -rotate-12 -bottom-16"> | |
<img src={heropic} alt="" className="w-2/4" /> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
</section> | |
<section className="flex flex-row justify-center items-center p-32"> | |
{/* <div className="w-3/5 p-28 mt-20"> | |
<h1 className="text-8xl font-bold text-black "> | |
Our name says it all! | |
</h1> | |
<p className="text-black text-2xl"> | |
Founder, Jonathan Li, shares a passion for board games, boba, and | |
delicious food, so he combined them all to become Sip & Play, Park | |
Slope’s first board game cafe. It is a straightforward concept: come | |
in with your friends and family to play any board game from our | |
library of 300+ games! We hope when you visit, you also enjoy our | |
coffee, espresso, boba, sandwiches, and snacks! | |
</p> | |
<ul className="text-xl mt-4"> | |
<li>New opening hours:</li> | |
<li>Sunday: 10am-11pm</li> | |
<li>Mon-Thurs: 11am-11pm</li> | |
<li>Fri: 11am-midnight</li> | |
<li>Sat: 10am-midnight</li> | |
</ul> | |
<button className="p-2 border-2 border-slate-500">Learn more↗️</button> | |
</div> */} | |
<div className="w-1/2 absolute p-4 md:right-40 m-auto"> | |
<img src={coffecup} alt="" className="w-96 rotate-12"/> | |
<LazyLoadImage | |
alt={"image.alt"} | |
effect="blur" | |
wrapperProps={{ | |
style: { transitionDelay: "1s" }, | |
}} | |
className="w-96 rotate-12" | |
src={coffecup} /> | |
<section className="flex flex-row justify-center items-center p-32"> | |
<div className="w-1/2 absolute p-4 md:right-40 m-auto"> | |
<LazyLoadImage | |
alt={"Coffee cup"} | |
effect="blur" | |
wrapperProps={{ | |
style: { transitionDelay: "1s" }, | |
}} | |
className="w-96 rotate-12" | |
src={coffecup} /> |
const [cardsToShow, setCardsToShow] = useState(1); | ||
|
||
const updateCardsToShow = () => { | ||
if (window.innerWidth >= 768) { | ||
setCardsToShow(4); | ||
setCardsToShow(4); | ||
} else { | ||
setCardsToShow(1); | ||
setCardsToShow(1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Hardcoded card count still references 3 in layout configurations.
Please update the className
for medium screens to reflect the new card count of 4:
frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx
:className="w-full p-2 sm:w-1/2 md:w-1/4 lg:w-1/4"
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify carousel behavior after increasing cards shown on larger screens.
The increase from 3 to 4 cards shown on larger screens is a good improvement for content visibility. However, please ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the carousel's behavior, especially regarding width calculations and smooth transitions between slides.
To verify the carousel's behavior, please test on various screen sizes and check for any layout issues. You might want to run the following commands to check for any hardcoded values that might need updating:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for hardcoded values related to card count or width calculations
rg -t jsx -t js '(3|33\.33|100/3)%?' frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for hardcoded values related to card count or width calculations
rg '(3|4|33\.33|100/3)%?' frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx
Length of output: 1090
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for class names or patterns that reference a card count of 3
rg 'w-1/3' frontend/src/components/ui/ReviewCarousel.jsx
Length of output: 122
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board7} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board8} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board8} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board10} | ||
alt="Wingspan" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Wingspan</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Attract and collect birds in this relaxing engine-building game. | ||
</p> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board10} | ||
alt="Wingspan" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Wingspan</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Attract and collect birds in this relaxing engine-building game. | ||
</p> | ||
</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Suggestion: Refactor repeated board game sections.
Consider creating a separate BoardGameCard
component to encapsulate the repeated structure for each board game. This would improve code maintainability and reduce duplication. You could then map over an array of board game data to render these components.
Example refactor:
const BoardGameCard = ({ image, alt, title, description }) => (
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2">
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#">
<span className="sr-only">View</span>
</a>
<img
src={image}
alt={alt}
width="500"
height="400"
className="object-cover w-full h-64"
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }}
/>
<div className="p-4 bg-background">
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">{title}</h3>
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground">{description}</p>
</div>
</div>
);
// In the main component
const boardGames = [
{ image: board1, alt: "Catan", title: "Catan", description: "Settle the island of Catan in this classic resource management game." },
// ... other board games
];
// Render board games
{boardGames.map((game, index) => (
<BoardGameCard key={index} {...game} />
))}
This refactoring will make the code more maintainable and easier to update in the future.
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board6} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board7} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board7} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board8} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
<div className="relative overflow-hidden transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out rounded-lg shadow-lg group hover:shadow-xl hover:-translate-y-2"> | ||
<a className="absolute inset-0 z-10" href="#"> | ||
<span className="sr-only">View</span> | ||
</a> | ||
<img | ||
src={board8} | ||
alt="Azul" | ||
width="500" | ||
height="400" | ||
className="object-cover w-full h-64" | ||
style={{ aspectRatio: '500 / 400', objectFit: 'cover' }} | ||
/> | ||
<div className="p-4 bg-background"> | ||
<h3 className="text-xl font-bold">Azul</h3> | ||
<p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground"> | ||
Collect and place beautiful tiles to decorate the walls of a palace. | ||
</p> | ||
</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue: Duplicate content for some board games.
There are multiple board game entries (lines 138-193) that have identical content for the game "Azul". This appears to be unintentional and should be corrected. Each board game entry should have unique and accurate information.
Please review and update the content for these entries to ensure each represents a different game or provides unique information about variations of Azul if that's the intention.
if (!response.ok) { | ||
const errorMessage = | ||
data.message || "An error occurred while submitting feedback."; | ||
setError(errorMessage); | ||
console.error("Feedback submission failed:", errorMessage); | ||
return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid displaying server error messages directly to users
To prevent potential exposure of sensitive server information, it's safer to display a generic error message to the user. Log the detailed error message to the console instead.
Apply this diff to adjust the error handling:
const data = await response.json();
if (!response.ok) {
- const errorMessage =
- data.message || "An error occurred while submitting feedback.";
- setError(errorMessage);
- console.error("Feedback submission failed:", errorMessage);
+ setError("An error occurred while submitting feedback.");
+ console.error("Feedback submission failed:", data.message || response.statusText);
return;
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (!response.ok) { | |
const errorMessage = | |
data.message || "An error occurred while submitting feedback."; | |
setError(errorMessage); | |
console.error("Feedback submission failed:", errorMessage); | |
return; | |
if (!response.ok) { | |
setError("An error occurred while submitting feedback."); | |
console.error("Feedback submission failed:", data.message || response.statusText); | |
return; | |
} |
@@ -113,7 +139,7 @@ | |||
type="submit" | |||
className="w-full flex justify-center py-2 px-4 border border-transparent rounded-md shadow-sm text-sm font-medium text-white bg-[#004D43] hover:bg-[#003d35] focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-offset-2 focus:ring-[#004D43]" | |||
> | |||
Submit Feedback | |||
{isLoading ? "Submitting..." : "Submit Feedback"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Disable the submit button while the form is submitting to prevent duplicate submissions
Users can click the submit button multiple times during form submission, potentially causing multiple requests. Disabling the submit button when isLoading
is true
prevents this issue.
Apply this diff to disable the submit button during submission:
<button
type="submit"
className="w-full flex justify-center py-2 px-4 border border-transparent rounded-md shadow-sm text-sm font-medium text-white bg-[#004D43] hover:bg-[#003d35] focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-offset-2 focus:ring-[#004D43]"
+ disabled={isLoading}
>
{isLoading ? "Submitting..." : "Submit Feedback"}
</button>
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
@RamakrushnaBiswal i have resolved the merge conflict |
@17arindam you made too much changes with many files |
-A success message is displayed when a user logs in or logs out successfully.
-An error message is shown if there is a failure during login/logout attempts.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
.gitignore
to include additional environment configuration files.