Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restrict Event Booking to Verified Users #427
Restrict Event Booking to Verified Users #427
Changes from all commits
161b6154704cdd212567cdc62e331554bd1File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change status code to 401 Unauthorized for invalid token.
When token verification fails due to an invalid token, it's more appropriate to return a 401 Unauthorized response instead of 403 Forbidden. The 401 status code indicates that authentication has failed, which aligns with the nature of an invalid token.
Apply this diff to change the status code:
logger.error("Token verification failed:", err); - return res.status(403).json({ message: "Invalid token" }); + return res.status(401).json({ message: "Invalid token" });📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Authentication requirement for GET /all should be removed
The frontend Event.jsx component makes an unauthenticated request to fetch events (
/api/event/all), while the backend requires authentication. This mismatch causes a functionality gap where:Recommended changes:
authenticateCustomermiddleware from the GET/allroute/createand GET/deleteroutes🔗 Analysis chain
Reconsider authentication requirement for GET /all
The current implementation requires authentication for viewing all events, which might be too restrictive. Consider whether events should be publicly viewable while keeping the booking functionality restricted to verified users (as per PR objectives).
Let's verify the requirements:
Let me gather more specific information about the authentication and event access patterns.
Let me try one more search to understand the event-related components and authentication flow better.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 399
Script:
Length of output: 515
Script:
Length of output: 12050
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replace GET /delete with DELETE method
Using GET for delete operations violates RESTful principles and can lead to unintended consequences (e.g., search engine crawlers accidentally deleting resources).
Apply this change:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Authentication check needs enhancement
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
Consider implementing these improvements:
const handleRegisterClick = () => { - const isAuthenticated = Boolean(Cookies.get('authToken')); + try { + const authToken = Cookies.get('authToken'); + const isVerified = Cookies.get('isVerified'); // Add verification check - if (!isAuthenticated) { - alert("Please sign in to register for the event."); - navigate('/login'); + if (!authToken || !isVerified) { + // Store current path for redirect after login + sessionStorage.setItem('redirectAfterLogin', window.location.pathname); + // Use a more user-friendly notification system + setError(isVerified ? + "Please sign in to register for the event" : + "Please verify your email before registering"); + navigate('/login'); + return; } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error checking authentication:', error); + setError('Something went wrong. Please try again.'); + } };Also, consider adding a state management solution (like Redux or Context) to handle authentication state more robustly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Inconsistent registration button behavior
There are two different registration buttons in the component:
This creates inconsistent user experience and potential security gaps.
Consolidate the registration functionality:
Also applies to: 308-308