Bug Fix: #386 Copyright Part not visible #389
Conversation
|
@harjasae2001 is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Content.jsx (2)
46-53: Copyright text implementation looks good but could be improvedThe copyright text is now properly visible with responsive styling. However, consider these improvements:
- Use a dynamic year instead of hardcoding "2024"
- Use HTML entity
©instead of©for better browser compatibility- <p className={`flex ${isWide ? `text-xl justify-center mt-3` : `text-base mt-1`}`}>©2024 by Sip & Play</p> + <p className={`flex ${isWide ? `text-xl justify-center mt-3` : `text-base mt-1`}`}>©{new Date().getFullYear()} by Sip & Play</p>
47-51: Consider adding text size constraints for better readabilityWhile using viewport units (
vw) for responsive text is good, consider adding min/max size constraints to ensure readability across all screen sizes.- className={`${isWide ? 'text-[7.5vw]' : 'text-[12vw]'} leading-[0.8]`} + className={`${isWide ? 'text-[7.5vw]' : 'text-[12vw]'} leading-[0.8] min-[text-2xl] max-[text-8xl]`}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Content.jsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Content.jsx (2)
42-44: Improved spacing with justify-evenlyThe change from
justify-betweentojustify-evenlyprovides better balanced spacing between elements, which helps prevent the copyright text from being pushed to extremes.
42-53: Verify the copyright visibility across different screen sizesThe changes appear to properly address the copyright visibility issue through improved spacing and responsive styling. Please verify the fix by testing on various screen sizes and devices.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the copyright visibility implementation.
The first command will help us find any other instances of the copyright text and its styling context, while the second command will identify all footer-related components to ensure consistent implementation.
Note: Fixed the file type flags for ripgrep to use
-t jsand-t jsxinstead of--type.
Let me try one final verification to check the footer components' implementation.
This will help us verify if the copyright implementation is consistent across footer components and if the responsive styling is properly handled.
Based on the analysis of the footer components, I can now provide the final response:
Copyright visibility changes are properly implemented and isolated
The implementation in
Content.jsxis the single source of the copyright text and its responsive styling. The mainFooter.jsxcomponent only handles the layout structure and properly delegates the content rendering to theContentcomponent. This confirms that:
- The copyright styling changes are centralized in the correct component
- The responsive implementation using
isWideconditional classes is properly scoped- There are no conflicting implementations in other footer components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any similar visibility issues reported in other components rg -i "copyright.*visibility|visibility.*copyright" --type js --type jsxLength of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for copyright-related styling patterns in the codebase rg -t js -t jsx "©.*Sip & Play" -A 2 -B 2 # Look for other footer components that might have similar patterns fd -e js -e jsx footerLength of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of both footer components to understand the implementation cat frontend/src/components/Shared/Footer.jsx frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Footer.jsx # Look for responsive styling patterns in these components rg -t js "isWide.*text-\[" frontend/src/components/Shared/Footer.jsx frontend/src/components/Shared/footer/Footer.jsxLength of output: 837
RamakrushnaBiswal
merged commit e1acc1b
into
RamakrushnaBiswal:main
RamakrushnaBiswal
added
bug
For Desktop type devices :
For mobile Type devices :
Let me know any more changes required.
Summary by CodeRabbit