Chore: fixed past date selection for reservation #288
Conversation
|
@lade6501 is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (3)
38-44: Good implementation, but consider improving user experience.The
handleDateValidationfunction correctly implements the logic to prevent selection of past dates. However, automatically resetting the date might be confusing for users.Consider the following improvement:
- Instead of automatically resetting the date, you could set an error state and display an error message near the input field. This allows users to correct their input themselves.
Here's a suggested implementation:
const [dateError, setDateError] = useState(''); const handleDateValidation = () => { if (date.length === 10 && date < minDate) { setDateError('You cannot select a date before today.'); } else { setDateError(''); } }; // In your JSX, add this below the date input: {dateError && <p className="text-red-500 text-sm mt-1">{dateError}</p>}This approach provides a better user experience by allowing users to see and correct their mistakes.
118-121: LGTM: Date input field properly restricted and validated.The modifications to the date input field effectively implement the date restriction:
- Setting
min={minDate}prevents selection of dates before today in the date picker.- Adding
onBlur={handleDateValidation}ensures validation when the user leaves the field.These changes, combined with the
handleDateValidationfunction, successfully prevent users from selecting past dates for reservations.Consider adding an
aria-describedbyattribute to improve accessibility:aria-describedby="dateInstructions"And add this element near the input:
<p id="dateInstructions" className="sr-only">Please select a date from today onwards.</p>This will provide screen reader users with clear instructions about the date restriction.
Line range hint
1-214: Summary: Effective implementation of date restriction feature.The changes in this file successfully address the PR objective of preventing users from selecting past dates for reservations. The implementation is comprehensive, covering both the date picker UI restriction and manual input validation. Key points:
- Introduction of
minDatestate variable.- Proper initialization of
minDatein theuseEffecthook.- Implementation of
handleDateValidationfunction for manual input validation.- Modification of the date input field to include
minattribute andonBlurevent.These changes effectively solve the issue without negatively impacting existing functionality. The code is clean and well-integrated into the existing component structure.
For future enhancements, consider:
- Implementing client-side form validation for all fields before submission.
- Adding server-side validation as well to ensure data integrity.
- Implementing error handling for the fetch call in
handleSubmit.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (2)
14-14: LGTM: New state variable for minimum date.The addition of the
minDatestate variable is a good approach to implement the date restriction feature. This aligns well with the PR objective of preventing users from selecting past dates for reservations.
48-49: LGTM: Proper initialization of minimum date.The
useEffecthook correctly sets theminDateto today's date when the component mounts. This ensures that users cannot select dates before today, which aligns with the PR objective.
|
@lade6501 good work but instead using normal alert user antd message for that |
Yeah was thinking the same , but was not sure thanks for feedback. |
|
Hi @RamakrushnaBiswal like this ? |
|
@lade6501 yes |
|
@lade6501 commit ? |
just pushing |
|
pushed @RamakrushnaBiswal, sorry for delay. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (4)
1-7: LGTM: Consistent quote usage in imports.The change to single quotes in import statements improves consistency. To maintain this style throughout the project, consider using a linter with appropriate rules.
Consider adding an ESLint rule to enforce consistent quote usage:
{ "rules": { "quotes": ["error", "single"] } }
20-20: LGTM: Consistent semicolon usage.Adding a semicolon at the end of the
useStatedeclaration improves consistency. Ensure this style is maintained throughout the file and project.Consider using a linter rule to enforce consistent semicolon usage:
{ "rules": { "semi": ["error", "always"] } }
133-143: LGTM: Improved password visibility toggle implementation.The changes to the password input and visibility toggle button improve code readability and maintain consistent styling. The dynamic password input type based on the
hiddenstate is a good implementation.Consider adding an
aria-labelto the visibility toggle button to improve accessibility:<button className="absolute top-1/2 -translate-y-1/2 right-4" onClick={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); setHidden(!hidden); }} + aria-label={hidden ? "Show password" : "Hide password"} > {hidden ? <FaEyeSlash /> : <FaEye />} </button>
148-161: Great addition: Password strength meter with conditional rendering.The new password strength meter enhances the user experience by providing visual feedback. The conditional rendering is a good practice to prevent unnecessary display when the password field is empty.
Consider adding an
aria-liveregion to announce password strength changes for screen reader users:{data.password && ( - <div className="w-full mt-2"> + <div className="w-full mt-2" aria-live="polite"> <div className="h-2 rounded-full" style={{ backgroundColor: getPasswordStrengthColor(passwordStrength), width: `${(passwordStrength + 1) * 20}%`, }} ></div> <p className="text-sm text-[#666] mt-1"> Strength: {getPasswordStrengthText(passwordStrength)} </p> </div> )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (4)
25-28: LGTM: Consistent quote usage in handleChange function.The change to single quotes for the password field name comparison is consistent with the earlier changes and maintains the existing functionality.
83-85: LGTM: Consistent quote usage in useEffect hook.The formatting change in the useEffect hook to use single quotes is consistent with the earlier changes and maintains the existing functionality.
88-94: LGTM: Consistent quote usage in password strength functions.The changes to use single quotes in the
getPasswordStrengthColorandgetPasswordStrengthTextfunctions are consistent with the earlier changes and maintain the existing functionality.
Line range hint
1-161: Overall: Improved code consistency and enhanced user interface.The changes in this file primarily focus on improving code consistency through uniform quote usage and minor stylistic adjustments. The addition of the password strength meter enhances the user experience during the signup process. These changes maintain the existing functionality while improving code readability and providing valuable visual feedback to users.
Key improvements:
- Consistent use of single quotes throughout the file.
- Enhanced password visibility toggle implementation.
- Addition of a password strength meter with conditional rendering.
The changes align well with the PR objectives of improving the user experience in the signup process. No major issues or bugs were introduced, and the overall quality of the code has been improved.
|
one conflict @lade6501 |
lade6501
force-pushed
the
issue#237-past-date-selection
branch
from
8295c71 to
7f38ea3
Compare
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
RamakrushnaBiswal
added
bug
Fixes: #237
Changes In PR
Demo
Playcafe-Validation-Manual-Type.mov
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style