-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check now #168
Check now #168
Conversation
@samar12-rad is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes to Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
backend/index.js (2)
12-13
: Consider removing one empty line.While empty lines can improve code readability by separating logical sections, multiple consecutive empty lines may be unnecessary. Consider removing one of these empty lines to maintain consistent spacing throughout the file.
Line range hint
43-43
: Good addition of route-specific CORS preflight.The addition of a route-specific CORS preflight for "/api/reservation/create" is a good practice, allowing for more granular control over CORS settings. This can help enhance security by limiting CORS to only the necessary routes.
Consider moving this line closer to your route definitions for better code organization. For example, you could place it just before the line:
app.use("/api", require("./routes/index"));This would group related routing configurations together, improving code readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- backend/index.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/index.js (1)
Line range hint
1-62
: Overall good improvements with minor suggestions for refinement.The changes to this file enhance CORS configuration and improve code clarity through added comments. The introduction of
corsOptions
and route-specific CORS preflight are positive additions that can improve security and maintainability.To further refine the code:
- Consider consolidating the CORS configurations to avoid duplication.
- Reorganize the placement of the route-specific CORS preflight for better code structure.
- Remove one of the consecutive empty lines at the beginning of the file.
These minor adjustments will result in a more organized and maintainable codebase.
// CORS configuration | ||
const corsOptions = { | ||
origin: ["http://localhost:5173", "https://play-cafe.vercel.app"], | ||
}; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate CORS configurations to avoid duplication.
The newly added corsOptions
object duplicates the origin
array from the existing CORS configuration. To improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies, consider consolidating these configurations.
Here's a suggested refactor:
- // CORS configuration
- app.use(
- cors({
- origin: ["http://localhost:5173", "https://play-cafe.vercel.app"],
- })
- );
// CORS configuration
const corsOptions = {
origin: ["http://localhost:5173", "https://play-cafe.vercel.app"],
};
+ // Apply CORS middleware
+ app.use(cors(corsOptions));
This change eliminates duplication and ensures that any updates to allowed origins only need to be made in one place.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
8a2e2fa
into
RamakrushnaBiswal:main
Summary by CodeRabbit
/api/reservation/create
route.