added the button only using tailwind #142
Conversation
I have added button according to UI
I have resolved the error and updated the CSS for button Closes Issue: RamakrushnaBiswal#84
Removed css ; added tailwind RamakrushnaBiswal#84
I hv done the changes and only used Tailwind CSS RamakrushnaBiswal#66
|
@maitri-vv is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several files within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14023932 | Triggered | MongoDB Credentials | 2f92d19 | backend/.env | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
frontend/src/App.css (2)
Line range hint
1-30: Consider further reducing custom CSS to align with PR objectivesWhile significant progress has been made in removing custom CSS classes, there are still some areas where custom CSS is being used. To fully align with the PR objective of using "only Tailwind," consider the following suggestions:
- Font imports: Instead of importing fonts via CSS, you can configure them in your Tailwind setup. Add the following to your
tailwind.config.js:module.exports = { theme: { extend: { fontFamily: { sans: ['DM Sans', 'sans-serif'], montserrat: ['Montserrat', 'sans-serif'], }, }, }, // ... }Then use them in your components with classes like
font-sansorfont-montserrat.
- Basic layout styles: The styles for
html,body,#root, and.Appcan be moved to your main JSX file (e.g.,App.jsx) using Tailwind classes:function App() { return ( <div className="h-full w-full font-sans bg-[#F1EADC]"> {/* Your app content */} </div> ); }
- Background color: As shown above, use Tailwind's arbitrary value syntax to set the specific background color.
By making these changes, you can potentially remove this CSS file entirely, fully embracing Tailwind for all styling needs.
Would you like assistance in implementing these changes to fully transition to Tailwind?
Removed CSS classes and radio input styling are still in use
frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx:className="star"frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx:type="radio"🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-30: Verify replacement of removed CSS classes with Tailwind utilitiesThe AI summary indicates that the
.rating-button,input[type="radio"], and.starclasses have been removed. While this aligns with the goal of using only Tailwind, it's crucial to ensure that the styling and functionality these classes provided have been properly replaced with Tailwind utilities in the respective components.Please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the removed classes and confirm their replacement with Tailwind classes:
Please review the script output to ensure that:
- The removed classes are no longer in use.
- Appropriate Tailwind classes have been applied to replace the styling of radio inputs and star ratings.
- The functionality and appearance of affected components have been maintained using Tailwind utilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of removed CSS classes and their Tailwind replacements # Test 1: Search for removed class names in JSX files echo "Searching for removed class names:" rg --type jsx 'className="(rating-button|star)"' frontend/src # Test 2: Search for radio input styling echo "Checking radio input styling:" rg --type jsx 'type="radio"' frontend/src # Test 3: Look for Tailwind classes that might replace the removed styles echo "Searching for potential Tailwind replacements:" rg --type jsx 'className="[^"]*(?:bg-|text-|border-|rounded-|shadow-|hover:)[^"]*"' frontend/srcLength of output: 541
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of removed CSS classes and their Tailwind replacements # Test 1: Search for removed class names in JS and JSX files echo "Searching for removed class names in .js, .jsx, .ts, .tsx files:" rg --glob "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" 'className="(rating-button|star)"' frontend/src # Test 2: Search for radio input styling in JS and JSX files echo "Checking radio input styling in .js, .jsx, .ts, .tsx files:" rg --glob "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" 'type="radio"' frontend/src # Test 3: Look for Tailwind classes that might replace the removed styles in JS and JSX files echo "Searching for potential Tailwind replacements in .js, .jsx, .ts, .tsx files:" rg --glob "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}" 'className="[^"]*(?:bg-|text-|border-|rounded-|shadow-|hover:)[^"]*"' frontend/srcLength of output: 49700
frontend/src/App.jsx (3)
11-23: LGTM: "Back to Top" button state and scroll handling look good.The implementation of the "Back to Top" button visibility state and scroll event handling is well-done. The useEffect hook correctly adds and removes the event listener, and the scroll position check is appropriate.
Consider extracting the scroll threshold (100px from bottom) into a named constant for better readability and easier adjustment:
+ const SCROLL_THRESHOLD = 100; useEffect(() => { const handleScroll = () => { - const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - 100; + const isBottom = window.innerHeight + window.scrollY >= document.body.offsetHeight - SCROLL_THRESHOLD; setShowButton(isBottom); }; window.addEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); return () => window.removeEventListener("scroll", handleScroll); }, []);
30-35: LGTM: KindeProvider setup is secure and well-configured.The use of environment variables for sensitive information in the KindeProvider setup is a good security practice.
For consistency with the rest of the file, consider using single quotes for the environment variable keys:
<KindeProvider - clientId={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID} - domain={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN} - redirectUri={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI} - logoutUri={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI} + clientId={import.meta.env['VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID']} + domain={import.meta.env['VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN']} + redirectUri={import.meta.env['VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI']} + logoutUri={import.meta.env['VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI']} >
40-46: LGTM with suggestion: "Back to Top" button implementation is good, but could be more accessible.The conditional rendering and Tailwind styling of the "Back to Top" button are well-implemented. The hover effects and transitions provide a good user experience.
Consider improving accessibility by adding an aria-label to the button:
<button onClick={scrollToTop} + aria-label="Scroll back to top" className="fixed bottom-8 right-8 bg-[#E0F0B1] hover:bg-amber-300 text-white font-bold py-2 px-4 rounded-full shadow-lg transition-transform duration-300 transform hover:scale-110" > ↑ </button>This will provide more context for users relying on screen readers.
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (2)
14-16: Improved error handling for useAuth hook.The addition of a fallback mechanism for
setEmailis a good practice to prevent potential runtime errors. This change enhances the robustness of the component.Consider using optional chaining for a more concise syntax:
const { setEmail } = useAuth?.() || {};This achieves the same result with slightly cleaner code.
96-96: Consistent error handling in handleLogout.The additional check for
setEmailbefore calling it during logout is consistent with the earlier changes and prevents potential runtime errors.For consistency with the
fetchUserDetailsfunction, consider using an if statement:if (setEmail) { setEmail(null); }This makes the code style more uniform throughout the component.
frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (3)
122-122: Consider the impact of disabling autocomplete for the name field.While adding
autoComplete="off"aligns with the PR's objective of removing CSS, it might negatively impact user experience. Autocomplete can be helpful for returning users, making the form easier to fill out.Consider using
autoComplete="name"instead to allow helpful autocomplete suggestions while still specifying the expected input type.
140-140: Reconsider autocomplete setting for email field.While the addition of
autoComplete="off"is consistent with the name field, it may not be the best choice for email inputs. Email addresses are commonly autocompleted to improve user experience and reduce typing errors.Consider using
autoComplete="email"instead. This allows helpful autocomplete suggestions while still specifying the expected input type.
Line range hint
1-224: Overall assessment: Good progress, with room for refinement.The changes in this file align well with the PR objective of removing CSS in favor of Tailwind classes. The improvements to the textarea and success message animation enhance the user experience. However, the autocomplete settings for the name and email fields might benefit from reconsideration to balance the PR objectives with optimal user experience.
Consider reviewing the autocomplete settings for all form fields to ensure they provide the best balance between the PR objectives and user-friendly form behavior. This might involve using specific autocomplete values (like "name" and "email") rather than turning off autocomplete entirely.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.css (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (6 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
frontend/src/App.jsx (4)
3-7: LGTM: Import statements and initial setup look good.The changes to import statements, including the use of single quotes and specific React hook imports, align with best practices and improve code consistency.
25-27: LGTM: scrollToTop function is well-implemented.The
scrollToTopfunction uses the modernscrollTomethod with smooth scrolling behavior, providing a good user experience.
36-38: LGTM: Main component structure is clean and well-organized.The main structure with Navbar, Outlet, and Footer components wrapped in the KindeProvider is logically organized and suggests proper integration with React Router.
1-51: Overall, the changes to App.jsx are well-implemented and improve functionality.The addition of the "Back to Top" button with proper state management and scroll handling enhances user experience. The use of Tailwind for styling aligns with the PR objectives. Minor suggestions have been made to improve consistency and accessibility.
Remember to test these changes thoroughly, especially the scroll behavior on different devices and screen sizes.
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (5)
57-58: Consistent error handling in fetchUserDetails.The additional check for
setEmailbefore calling it is consistent with the earlier changes and prevents potential runtime errors. This improves the overall reliability of the component.
187-187: Improved code formatting.The removal of the line break in the className string improves code readability without affecting functionality. This change contributes to a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.
196-196: Consistent code formatting improvements.The removal of line breaks in these className strings is consistent with the earlier formatting changes. This uniformity in code style enhances overall readability and maintainability of the component.
Also applies to: 204-204
216-216: Explicit default export added.The addition of an explicit default export statement at the end of the file is a good practice. While it doesn't change the functionality, it improves code clarity and makes the module's interface more obvious to other developers.
Line range hint
1-216: Overall assessment: Improved error handling and code quality.The changes in this file primarily focus on enhancing error handling for the
useAuthhook and improving code formatting. These modifications contribute to a more robust and readable component. The consistent approach to handling potential undefined values reduces the risk of runtime errors, while the formatting improvements enhance code maintainability.frontend/src/components/ui/FeedbackForm.jsx (2)
158-158: Approved: Improved textarea flexibility.Removing the
resize-noneclass allows users to resize the textarea, which can enhance the user experience, especially for longer feedback entries. This change aligns well with the PR objective of removing CSS classes while improving functionality.
Line range hint
201-201: Approved: Enhanced success message animation.The addition of
display:"none"andheight:0to the initial state of the success message animation is a good improvement. This ensures that the message is completely hidden before the animation starts, preventing any potential layout shifts or flashes of content. It contributes to a smoother and more polished user interface.
| @keyframes bounce { | ||
| 0%, 100% { | ||
| transform: translateY(0); | ||
| } | ||
| 50% { | ||
| transform: translateY(-10px); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using Tailwind's animation utilities instead of custom CSS keyframes.
While the added bounce animation doesn't contradict the PR objectives, Tailwind CSS provides built-in animation utilities that could be used instead. This would align better with the goal of using "only Tailwind" for styling.
Instead of defining a custom keyframe animation, you can use Tailwind's animate-bounce class directly in your JSX. For example:
<div className="animate-bounce">
{/* Your bouncing content */}
</div>If you need to customize the animation, you can extend Tailwind's animation configuration in the tailwind.config.js file:
module.exports = {
theme: {
extend: {
animation: {
'custom-bounce': 'bounce 1s infinite',
},
keyframes: {
bounce: {
'0%, 100%': { transform: 'translateY(0)' },
'50%': { transform: 'translateY(-10px)' },
}
}
}
}
}Then use it in your JSX:
<div className="animate-custom-bounce">
{/* Your bouncing content */}
</div>This approach maintains the use of Tailwind for all styling, including animations.
Removed css only tailwind is there now
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
setEmailfunction in the Navbar component to prevent potential issues.Improvements
Style