-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add twirling options to SamplerV2 #1583
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comment but LGTM - it'd also be good to add/update a test in test_sampler_v2
Co-authored-by: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ptristan3. It looks like we'll need to reword some of the TwirlingOptions
docstrings to make them more generic, as they are specific to the estimator right now.
We should also mention that measurement twirling will only be applied to those measurement registers not involved in conditional logic.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8693834567Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think measurement twirling for sampler is enabled on the server side yet. We should wait for that before merging.
@ptristan3 can we also add twirling to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but let's not merge until the server side support is ready
Co-authored-by: Ian Hincks <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ian Hincks <[email protected]>
# Conflicts: # qiskit_ibm_runtime/options/sampler_options.py
Summary
Details and comments
Fixes #1557