Fix bad Sphinx API doc Provider naming (#1360)

This resulted in the imports being called `qiskit_ibm_provider` rather than `qiskit_ibm_runtime`.

Co-authored-by: Frank Harkins <[email protected]>

qiskit_ibm_runtime/transpiler/__init__.py

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 """
 ====================================================================
-IBM Backend Transpiler Tools (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler`)
+IBM Backend Transpiler Tools (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler`)
 ====================================================================
 
 A collection of transpiler tools for working with IBM Quantum's

qiskit_ibm_runtime/transpiler/passes/__init__.py

@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
 
 """
 ================================================================
-Transpiler Passes (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler.passes`)
+Transpiler Passes (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler.passes`)
 ================================================================
 
-.. currentmodule:: qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler.passes
+.. currentmodule:: qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler.passes
 
 A collection of transpiler passes for IBM backends.
 

qiskit_ibm_runtime/transpiler/passes/basis/__init__.py

@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
 
 """
 ==========================================================
-Basis (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler.passes.basis`)
+Basis (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler.passes.basis`)
 ==========================================================
 
-.. currentmodule:: qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler.passes.basis
+.. currentmodule:: qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler.passes.basis
 
 Passes to layout circuits to IBM backend's instruction sets.
 """

qiskit_ibm_runtime/transpiler/passes/scheduling/__init__.py

@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
 
 """
 ====================================================================
-Scheduling (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler.passes.scheduling`)
+Scheduling (:mod:`qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler.passes.scheduling`)
 ====================================================================
 
-.. currentmodule:: qiskit_ibm_provider.transpiler.passes.scheduling
+.. currentmodule:: qiskit_ibm_runtime.transpiler.passes.scheduling
 
 A collection of scheduling passes for working with IBM Quantum's next-generation
 backends that support advanced "dynamic circuit" capabilities. Ie.,
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
     # Transpile.
     scheduled_teleport = pm.run(teleport)
 
-    scheduled_teleport.draw(output="mpl")
+    scheduled_teleport.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 Instead of padding with delays we may also insert a dynamical decoupling sequence
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
 
     dd_teleport = pm.run(teleport)
 
-    dd_teleport.draw(output="mpl")
+    dd_teleport.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 When compiling a circuit with Qiskit, it is more efficient and more robust to perform all the
 transformations in a single transpilation.  This has been done above by extending Qiskit's preset
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
 
     qc_c_if = QuantumCircuit(1, 1)
     qc_c_if.x(0).c_if(0, 1)
-    qc_c_if.draw(output="mpl")
+    qc_c_if.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 The :class:`.IBMBackend` configures a translation plugin
 :class:`.IBMTranslationPlugin` to automatically
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
     )
 
     qc_if_dd = pm.run(qc_c_if, backend)
-    qc_if_dd.draw(output="mpl")
+    qc_if_dd.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 If you are not using the transpiler plugin stages to
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
     )
 
     qc_if_dd = pm.run(qc_c_if)
-    qc_if_dd.draw(output="mpl")
+    qc_if_dd.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 Exploiting IBM backend's local parallel "fast-path"
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
         with qc.if_test((1, 1)):
             qc.x(1)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 The circuit below will not use the fast-path as the conditional gate is
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
         with qc.if_test((0, 1)):
             qc.x(1)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 Similarly, the circuit below contains gates on multiple qubits
 and will not be performed using the fast-path.
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
             qc.x(0)
             qc.x(1)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 A fast-path block may contain multiple gates as long as they are on the fast-path qubit.
 If there are multiple fast-path blocks being performed in parallel each block will be
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
         with qc.if_test((1, 1)):
             qc.delay(1600, 1)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 This behavior is also applied to the else condition of a fast-path eligible branch.
 
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
         with else_:
             qc.delay(1600, 0)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 If a single measurement result is used with several conditional blocks, if there is a fast-path
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@
             # Does not use fast-path
             qc.x(1)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 If you wish to prevent the usage of the fast-path you may insert a barrier between the measurement and
 the conditional branch.
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
         with qc.if_test((0, 1)):
             qc.x(0)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 Conditional measurements are not eligible for the fast-path.
 
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
             # Does not use the fast-path
             qc.measure(0, 1)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 Similarly nested control-flow is not eligible.
 
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
             with qc.if_test((0, 1)):
                 qc.x(0)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 The scheduler is aware of the fast-path behavior and will not insert delays on idle qubits
@@ -345,11 +345,11 @@
         qc.delay(1000, 0)
 
 
-    qc.draw(output="mpl")
+    qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
     qc_dd = pm.run(qc)
 
-    qc_dd.draw(output="mpl")
+    qc_dd.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 .. note::
     If there are qubits that are *not* involved in a fast-path decision it is not
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@
             # since the condition is compile time evaluated.
             qc.x(2)
 
-        qc.draw(output="mpl")
+        qc.draw(output="mpl", style="iqp")
 
 
 Scheduling & Dynamical Decoupling