Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrated src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2854

Conversation

mandeepnh5
Copy link
Contributor

@mandeepnh5 mandeepnh5 commented Dec 25, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will migrate the src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest.

Issue Number:
Fixes #2835

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

Snapshots/Videos:
image

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Transitioned testing framework from Jest to Vitest for the InfiniteScrollLoader component tests.
    • Updated import statements to include Vitest's testing utilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the InfiniteScrollLoader component test file from Jest to Vitest. The change involves updating the import statements to use Vitest's testing functions, specifically importing describe, test, and expect. The structure of the existing tests remains unchanged, which continues to verify the rendering of the InfiniteScrollLoader component and the presence of specific elements in the document.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx Added Vitest import statements for testing functions

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2835]
Rename test file from .test.* to .spec.* [#2835]
Ensure tests pass using npm run test:vitest [#2835] Requires actual test run verification.
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2835] Requires coverage report verification.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Vitest springs, testing's now free!
From Jest to Vitest, we leap and bound,
Test coverage tight, bugs won't be found!
A rabbit's refactor, crisp and bright! 🧪


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bc2d3b and a4a7f4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx (2)

4-4: LGTM! Vitest imports are correctly implemented.

The migration from Jest to Vitest has been properly implemented with the correct import statement. The test structure and assertions remain compatible with Vitest.


Line range hint 1-15: Verify complete removal of Jest dependencies

The migration looks good, but let's verify there are no remaining Jest dependencies or configurations affecting this test file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx (1)

4-4: Remove unused import vi to satisfy lint checks

The static analysis tools correctly flag vi as an unused variable. If you do not plan to use vi for mocking or other functionality, removing it will address the lint error.

-import { describe, test, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
+import { describe, test, expect } from 'vitest';
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch

[failure] 4-4:
'vi' is defined but never used

🪛 eslint

[error] 4-4: 'vi' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bc2d3b and b074914.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx

[failure] 4-4:
'vi' is defined but never used

🪛 eslint
src/components/InfiniteScrollLoader/InfiniteScrollLoader.spec.tsx

[error] 4-4: 'vi' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.80%. Comparing base (1bc2d3b) to head (a4a7f4e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2854       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             65.12%   87.80%   +22.67%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      313       +17     
  Lines                  7369     8222      +853     
  Branches               1609     1798      +189     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   4799     7219     +2420     
+ Misses                 2336      804     -1532     
+ Partials                234      199       -35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mandeepnh5
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@mandeepnh5 Use this instead:

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

@palisadoes: Understood. I'll proceed with a full review as requested.

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@mandeepnh5
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mandeepnh5 Use this instead:

@coderabbitai full review

oh thanks

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@mandeepnh5: You're welcome! Let me know if there's anything else you need.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 910690b into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 25, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants