Merging develop-postgres branch into develop #2672
Conversation
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NishantSinghhhhh <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes across multiple files in the Talawa Admin project. The modifications span various aspects of the application, including workflow configurations, testing frameworks, localization, styling, and component updates. The primary focus appears to be on migrating test suites from Jest to Vitest, updating workflow configurations, and enhancing error handling and localization. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Workflow as GitHub Workflow
participant Linter as ESLint
participant Formatter as Code Formatter
participant Tester as Vitest
participant App as Talawa Admin App
Workflow->>Linter: Check code quality
Linter-->>Workflow: Linting results
Workflow->>Formatter: Run formatting
Formatter-->>Workflow: Formatted code
Workflow->>Tester: Run tests
Tester-->>Workflow: Test results
Workflow->>App: Build and verify startup
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.spec.tsx (1)
Line range hint
164-183: Enhance navigation test coverageThe navigation test could be more comprehensive:
it('redirects to root when orgId is undefined', () => { mockID = undefined; const navigate = vi.fn(); vi.spyOn({ useNavigate }, 'useNavigate').mockReturnValue(navigate); + // Verify initial state + expect(mockID).toBeUndefined(); + render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <UserScreen /> </I18nextProvider> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> </MockedProvider>, ); - expect(window.location.pathname).toEqual('/'); + // Verify navigation was called + expect(navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/'); + expect(navigate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); });public/locales/sp/errors.json (1)
Line range hint
1-9: Several messages need Spanish translationThe following messages are still in English and should be translated to Spanish:
- "talawaApiUnavailable"
- "notFound"
- "unknownError"
- "notAuthorised"
- "errorSendingMail"
- "emailNotRegistered"
- "notFoundMsg"
Would you like me to provide Spanish translations for these messages?
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.tsx (1)
Line range hint
85-102: Potential race condition in toggle functionThe togglePluginInstall function updates state after the mutation without checking the mutation result. This could lead to inconsistent state if the mutation fails.
const togglePluginInstall = async (): Promise<void> => { setButtonLoading(true); - await addOrgAsUninstalled({ - variables: { - id: id.toString(), - orgId: currentOrg.toString(), - }, - }); - - // Toggle the local installation status - setIsInstalledLocal(!isInstalledLocal); - setButtonLoading(false); + try { + const result = await addOrgAsUninstalled({ + variables: { + id: id.toString(), + orgId: currentOrg.toString(), + }, + }); + + if (result.data?.updateInstallStatusPlugin) { + setIsInstalledLocal(!isInstalledLocal); + const dialog: string = isInstalledLocal + ? t('installMsg') + : t('uninstallMsg'); + toast.success(dialog); + } + } catch (error) { + toast.error(t('installError')); + } finally { + setButtonLoading(false); + } - // Display a success message based on the new installation status - const dialog: string = isInstalledLocal - ? t('installMsg') - : t('uninstallMsg'); - toast.success(dialog); };src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx (1)
Line range hint
277-321: Remove console.log statement and enhance error handlingThe
loadMoreOrganizationsfunction contains a console.log statement that should be removed. Additionally, consider enhancing the error handling for the case whenfetchMoreResultis undefined.Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
const loadMoreOrganizations = (): void => { - console.log('loadMoreOrganizations'); setIsLoadingMore(true); fetchMore({ variables: { skip: orgsData?.organizationsConnection.length || 0, }, updateQuery: ( prev: | { organizationsConnection: InterfaceOrgConnectionType[] } | undefined, { fetchMoreResult, }: { fetchMoreResult: | { organizationsConnection: InterfaceOrgConnectionType[] } | undefined; }, ): | { organizationsConnection: InterfaceOrgConnectionType[] } | undefined => { setIsLoadingMore(false); - if (!fetchMoreResult) return prev; + if (!fetchMoreResult) { + return prev || { organizationsConnection: [] }; + } if (fetchMoreResult.organizationsConnection.length < perPageResult) { sethasMore(false); } return { organizationsConnection: [ ...(prev?.organizationsConnection || []), ...(fetchMoreResult.organizationsConnection || []), ], }; }, }); };
🧹 Nitpick comments (39)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.spec.tsx (2)
32-38: Consider using a more concise mock implementation.The mock implementation could be simplified using object shorthand notation.
vi.mock('react-toastify', () => ({ toast: { - success: vi.fn(), - error: vi.fn(), + success: vi.fn(), + error: vi.fn() }, }));
Line range hint
85-99: Consider simplifying the router mock implementation.The current implementation could be more concise by directly returning the mock object.
- vi.mock('react-router-dom', async () => ({ - ...(await vi.importActual('react-router-dom')), - useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }), - })); + vi.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({ + ...vi.importActual('react-router-dom'), + useParams: () => ({ orgId: 'orgId', eventId: 'eventId' }) + }));src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (1)
1-1: Consider implementing shared test utilities and setup files.To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication across test files, consider:
- Creating a shared test utilities file for common functions like
debounceWait- Moving common mocks (like window.matchMedia) to a shared setup file
- Establishing consistent patterns for mock implementations
This will make the test suite more maintainable and easier to update in the future.
src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.spec.tsx (4)
1-10: Consider enhancing the documentation headerThe documentation header is well-structured but could be improved by adding:
- Version/date information for tracking changes
- Author information for accountability
- Links to related components or documentation
/** * This file contains unit tests for the UserScreen component. * + * @version 1.0 + * @lastModified 2024 + * @see {@link ../UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx|UserScreen Component} + * @see {@link https://vitest.dev/|Vitest Documentation} * * The tests cover: * - Rendering of the correct title based on the location. * - Functionality of the LeftDrawer component. * - Behavior when the orgId is undefined. * * These tests use Vitest for test execution and MockedProvider for mocking GraphQL queries. */
29-37: Enhance mock implementation with TypeScript typesThe mock setup is clean but could benefit from type safety:
-vi.mock('react-router-dom', async () => { +vi.mock('react-router-dom', async (): Promise<typeof import('react-router-dom')> => { const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); return { ...actual, - useParams: () => ({ orgId: mockID }), - useLocation: () => ({ pathname: mockLocation }), - useNavigate: vi.fn(), // Mock only the necessary parts + useParams: (): { orgId: string | undefined } => ({ orgId: mockID }), + useLocation: (): { pathname: string | undefined } => ({ pathname: mockLocation }), + useNavigate: vi.fn(), }; });
Line range hint
38-90: Enhance utility functions and mock data structureConsider improving the robustness of the test utilities:
+interface OrganizationMock { + _id: string; + image: null | string; + creator: { + firstName: string; + lastName: string; + email: string; + }; + // ... other fields +} const resizeWindow = (width: number): void => { window.innerWidth = width; - fireEvent(window, new Event('resize')); + const resizeEvent = new Event('resize', { + bubbles: true, + cancelable: true + }); + window.dispatchEvent(resizeEvent); };
Line range hint
133-162: Add edge cases to window resize testsThe window resize tests could be more comprehensive:
Consider adding tests for:
- Extreme window sizes (very small/large)
- Rapid consecutive resizes
- Boundary conditions around the breakpoint
Example:
it('handles extreme window sizes correctly', () => { // Test very small window resizeWindow(300); expect(icon).toHaveClass('fa fa-angle-double-right'); // Test very large window resizeWindow(3000); expect(icon).toHaveClass('fa fa-angle-double-left'); // Test rapid resizing resizeWindow(800); resizeWindow(1000); resizeWindow(800); expect(icon).toHaveClass('fa fa-angle-double-right'); });vitest.config.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-36: Consider adding type checking for test configurationWhile the configuration is solid, consider enhancing type safety by:
- Adding JSDoc or type annotations for the configuration object
- Using Vitest's built-in configuration types
This will help catch configuration errors early and improve maintainability.
Example enhancement:
import { defineConfig, UserConfig } from 'vitest/config'; const config: UserConfig = { // ... your current configuration }; export default defineConfig(config);src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (3)
19-27: Consider adding error handling for edge casesThe mock implementation is clean and follows Vitest best practices. However, consider adding error handling for edge cases where the actual router import fails.
const mockRouterParams = (orgId: string | undefined): void => { vi.doMock('react-router-dom', async () => { - const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); + try { + const actual = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); + return { + ...actual, + useParams: () => ({ orgId }), + }; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to mock router params:', error); + throw error; + } - return { - ...actual, - useParams: () => ({ orgId }), - }; }); };
Line range hint
28-54: Consider using a more specific return typeThe implementation is solid, but the return type could be more specific than
ReturnType<typeof render>.+import type { RenderResult } from '@testing-library/react'; + const renderOrganisationSettings = ( link = link1, orgId = 'orgId', -): ReturnType<typeof render> => { +): RenderResult => {
133-146: Enhance dropdown test coverageWhile the basic dropdown functionality is tested, consider adding more assertions to verify the complete behavior.
it('should render dropdown for settings tabs', async () => { renderOrganisationSettings(); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('settingsDropdownToggle')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('settingsDropdownToggle')); const dropdownItems = screen.getAllByRole('button', { name: /general|actionItemCategories|agendaItemCategories/i, }); expect(dropdownItems).toHaveLength(3); + + // Verify dropdown item text + expect(dropdownItems[0]).toHaveTextContent(/general/i); + expect(dropdownItems[1]).toHaveTextContent(/actionItemCategories/i); + expect(dropdownItems[2]).toHaveTextContent(/agendaItemCategories/i); + + // Test interaction with dropdown items + await userEvent.click(dropdownItems[0]); + expect(screen.getByTestId('generalTab')).toBeVisible(); });src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.tsx (3)
5-5: Update or Remove Outdated CommentThe comment
// PLUGIN_LISTon line 5 appears to be outdated or misleading since you're importingPLUGIN_GET. Consider updating the comment to match the current import or removing it if it's unnecessary.
13-24: Clarify the Use of 'name' and 'pluginName' Fields in InterfaceThe
InterfacePluginHelperinterface includes bothnameandpluginNameproperties, which might lead to confusion or redundancy. Consider consolidating these fields or clearly documenting their distinct purposes to improve code readability and maintainability.
197-267: Refactor to Reduce Code Duplication Between TabsThe rendering logic in the 'available' and 'installed' tabs is very similar, leading to code duplication. Consider refactoring shared code into a separate component or function to enhance maintainability and reduce redundancy.
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.module.css (1)
10-12: Use Theme Variables Instead of Hardcoding ColorsThe colors
#31bb6bandgreenare hardcoded in the classes.entryactionand.card. To ensure consistency and maintainability, consider using theme variables or CSS variables for colors.Here's how you might adjust the CSS:
.entryaction { margin-left: auto; display: flex !important; align-items: center; background-color: transparent; color: var(--primary-color); } .card { border: 4px solid var(--border-color); }Ensure that
--primary-colorand--border-colorare defined in your CSS variables or theme.Also applies to: 13-14
src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.module.css (2)
4-10: Consider mobile responsiveness for grid layoutThe 6-column grid layout might not provide optimal display on mobile devices. Consider using CSS media queries to adjust the number of columns based on viewport width.
.listBox { display: grid; width: 100%; grid-template-rows: auto; - grid-template-columns: repeat(6, 1fr); + grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(250px, 1fr)); grid-gap: 0.8rem 0.4rem; }
33-33: Remove commented codeClean up the codebase by removing commented-out CSS rules.
.actioninput { text-decoration: none; - /* margin-bottom: 50px; */ border-color: #e8e5e5;src/components/AddOn/support/components/Action/Action.spec.tsx (1)
15-31: Consider adding more test scenariosWhile the basic rendering test is good, consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases (empty/null props)
- Interactive behaviors (if any)
- Error scenarios
- Component state changes
Example additional test cases:
test('should handle empty props gracefully', () => { const emptyProps = { children: '', label: '' }; const { container } = render( <Provider store={store}> <Action {...emptyProps} /> </Provider> ); expect(container).not.toBeEmpty(); }); test('should handle null props gracefully', () => { const nullProps = { children: null, label: null }; const { container } = render( <Provider store={store}> <Action {...nullProps} /> </Provider> ); expect(container).not.toBeEmpty(); });src/utils/errorHandler.tsx (2)
8-10: Documentation needs to be more specific about error casesWhile the documentation mentions regex matching, it should list all the specific error cases being handled for better maintainability.
Consider expanding the documentation like this:
- If the error is due to the Talawa API being unavailable, it displays a custom message. And for other error cases, it is using regular expression (case-insensitive) to match and show valid messages + Handles the following error cases: + - Talawa API unavailability + - Invalid phone number format + - Invalid education grade selection + - Invalid employment status + - Invalid marital status + - HTTP 400 Bad Request + All other errors are displayed as-is
13-27: Consider refactoring error pattern matching for maintainabilityThe current implementation uses multiple if-else statements with regex patterns. This could become harder to maintain as more error patterns are added.
Consider using a map of error patterns to error messages:
const ERROR_PATTERNS = new Map([ [/value is not a valid phone number/i, 'invalidPhoneNumber'], [/does not exist in "EducationGrade"/i, 'invalidEducationGrade'], [/does not exist in "EmploymentStatus"/i, 'invalidEmploymentStatus'], [/does not exist in "MaritalStatus"/i, 'invalidMaritalStatus'], [/status code 400/i, 'error400'] ]); // Then in the error handler: for (const [pattern, messageKey] of ERROR_PATTERNS) { if (errorMessage.match(pattern)) { return toast.error(tErrors(messageKey)); } }src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.module.css (2)
Line range hint
19-30: Remove commented out codeKeeping commented out code can lead to confusion and maintenance issues. If these styles are no longer needed, they should be removed. If they might be needed later, they should be tracked in version control history.
- /* .actioninput { - text-decoration: none; - margin-bottom: 50px; - border-color: #e8e5e5; - width: 80%; - border-radius: 7px; - padding-top: 5px; - padding-bottom: 5px; - padding-right: 10px; - padding-left: 10px; - box-shadow: none; - } */
46-57: Consider using CSS Grid areas for better maintainabilityThe grid layout is functional but could be more maintainable using named grid areas.
Consider refactoring to:
.justifysp { display: grid; width: 100%; grid-template-areas: "item1 item2" "item3 item4"; grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr); grid-gap: 0.8rem 0.4rem; justify-content: space-between; align-items: baseline; } .cardGridItem { grid-area: item1; /* Assign areas as needed */ width: 38vw; }src/components/AddOn/support/services/Plugin.helper.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
8-8: Remove duplicate property checkThe
generateLinksproperty is being checked twice in the expectations.expect(pluginHelper).toHaveProperty('fetchStore'); expect(pluginHelper).toHaveProperty('fetchInstalled'); expect(pluginHelper).toHaveProperty('generateLinks'); -expect(pluginHelper).toHaveProperty('generateLinks');jest.config.js (2)
71-71: Consider using pattern matching for test file exclusionsInstead of explicitly excluding a specific test file, consider using a pattern if there are more similar files to be excluded. This makes the configuration more maintainable.
coveragePathIgnorePatterns: [ 'src/state/index.ts', 'src/components/plugins/index.ts', 'src/components/AddOn/support/services/Render.helper.ts', 'src/components/SecuredRoute/SecuredRoute.tsx', 'src/reportWebVitals.ts', - 'src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.spec.tsx', + 'src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/*.spec.tsx', ],Also applies to: 83-83
Line range hint
74-78: Consider increasing coverage thresholdsThe current coverage thresholds of 20% for lines and statements are quite low. Consider gradually increasing these thresholds to ensure better test coverage.
src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
93-100: Consider adding more window resize test casesThe window resize test only checks for one width value (800px). Consider adding more test cases for different viewport sizes to ensure responsive behavior.
test('handles window resize', () => { renderComponent(); window.innerWidth = 800; fireEvent(window, new Event('resize')); expect(screen.getByTestId('mainpageright')).toHaveClass(styles.expand); + + window.innerWidth = 1200; + fireEvent(window, new Event('resize')); + expect(screen.getByTestId('mainpageright')).toHaveClass(styles.contract); + + window.innerWidth = 480; + fireEvent(window, new Event('resize')); + expect(screen.getByTestId('mainpageright')).toHaveClass(styles.expand); });src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (2)
15-33: Consider enhancing store mock with more realistic dataThe store mock is quite minimal. Consider adding more realistic mock data that matches the actual store structure to ensure tests are representative of real usage scenarios.
vi.mock('state/store', () => ({ store: { getState: vi.fn(() => ({ auth: { user: null, loading: false, + error: null, + isAuthenticated: false, + token: null }, + currentOrganization: { + id: null, + name: null + } })), subscribe: vi.fn(), dispatch: vi.fn(), }, }));
69-91: Consider adding snapshot testingThe component tests are good but could benefit from snapshot testing to catch unintended visual changes.
+ test('matches snapshot', () => { + const { container } = render( + <Avatar + name="Snapshot Test" + alt="Snapshot" + avatarStyle="custom-style" + dataTestId="snapshot-test" + /> + ); + expect(container).toMatchSnapshot(); + });src/utils/errorHandler.test.tsx (1)
83-93: Consider adding type checking testsWhile testing non-Error objects is good, consider adding more specific type checking tests.
+ it('should handle various non-standard error types', () => { + // Test with Error subclass + class CustomError extends Error { + constructor(message: string) { + super(message); + this.name = 'CustomError'; + } + } + errorHandler(t, new CustomError('Custom error')); + expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalled(); + + // Test with undefined message + errorHandler(t, { someOtherProp: 'value' }); + expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + tErrors('unknownError', { msg: { someOtherProp: 'value' } }) + ); + });src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.tsx (1)
105-108: Consider moving inline styles to CSS moduleInline styles should be moved to the CSS module for better maintainability and consistency.
// In AddOnEntry.module.css +.card { + border: 1px solid #31BB6B; + border-radius: 10px; +} + +.cardTitle { + font-weight: 800; +} // In component - <Card - data-testid="AddOnEntry" - style={{ border: '1px solid #31BB6B', borderRadius: '10px' }} - > + <Card + data-testid="AddOnEntry" + className={styles.card} + >Also applies to: 141-141
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.spec.tsx (2)
43-43: Consider using beforeAll/afterAll for console.error mockMocking console.error without cleanup could affect other tests. Consider moving this to test setup/teardown hooks.
-console.error = vi.fn(); +beforeAll(() => { + console.error = vi.fn(); +}); + +afterAll(() => { + vi.restoreAllMocks(); +});
192-224: Maintain consistency in test declarationsMix of
itandtestfunctions used. Stick to one style throughout the test suite for consistency.-it('Check if uninstalled orgs includes current org', async () => { +test('Check if uninstalled orgs includes current org', async () => {src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.tsx (1)
Line range hint
155-169: Extract repeated date comparison logic into a utility function.The date comparison logic for filtering advertisements is duplicated. Consider extracting it into a reusable utility function.
+const isActiveAd = (ad: Ad): boolean => new Date(ad.endDate) > new Date(); +const isArchivedAd = (ad: Ad): boolean => new Date(ad.endDate) < new Date(); // Then use these functions in the filters: -advertisements.filter((ad: Ad) => new Date(ad.endDate) > new Date()) +advertisements.filter(isActiveAd) -advertisements.filter((ad: Ad) => new Date(ad.endDate) < new Date()) +advertisements.filter(isArchivedAd)Also applies to: 235-249
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
104-104: Fix trailing space in file pattern.Remove the trailing space after
src/style/**to maintain consistent formatting.- src/style/** + src/style/**🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 104-104: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
607-618: Consider using modern scrollbar properties.The current implementation uses vendor-specific scrollbar styling. Consider using the standardized
scrollbar-gutterproperty for more consistent cross-browser behavior..containerBody { scrollbar-width: thin; scrollbar-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3) transparent; + scrollbar-gutter: stable; &::-webkit-scrollbar { width: thin; } &::-webkit-scrollbar-track { background: transparent; } &::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3); } }src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx (3)
399-399: Remove unnecessary empty object literalThe empty object literal
{}serves no purpose and should be removed.- {}
535-539: Simplify event list rendering logicThe conditional rendering logic for the event list can be simplified for better readability.
- {expanded === index - ? allEventsList - : holidayList?.length > 0 - ? allEventsList?.slice(0, 1) - : allEventsList?.slice(0, 2)} + {expanded === index ? allEventsList : + allEventsList?.slice(0, holidayList?.length > 0 ? 1 : 2)}
Line range hint
96-121: Enhance event filtering logicThe event filtering logic for different user roles could be simplified and made more efficient.
Consider refactoring the filtering logic to reduce repetition:
const filterData = ( eventData: InterfaceEventListCardProps[], orgData?: InterfaceIOrgList, userRole?: string, userId?: string, ): InterfaceEventListCardProps[] => { - const data: InterfaceEventListCardProps[] = []; if (userRole === Role.SUPERADMIN) return eventData; - if (userRole === Role.ADMIN) { - eventData?.forEach((event) => { - if (event.isPublic) data.push(event); - if (!event.isPublic) { - const filteredOrg: boolean | undefined = orgData?.admins?.some( - (data) => data._id === userId, - ); - - if (filteredOrg) { - data.push(event); - } - } - }); - } else { - eventData?.forEach((event) => { - if (event.isPublic) data.push(event); - const userAttending = event.attendees?.some( - (data) => data._id === userId, - ); - if (userAttending) { - data.push(event); - } - }); - } - return data; + return eventData?.filter((event) => { + if (event.isPublic) return true; + if (userRole === Role.ADMIN) { + return orgData?.admins?.some((admin) => admin._id === userId); + } + return event.attendees?.some((attendee) => attendee._id === userId); + }) ?? []; };src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (1)
199-199: LGTM! Early returns for reCAPTCHA verification enhance security.The added early returns ensure that login and signup operations only proceed after successful reCAPTCHA verification when enabled.
Consider extracting the common reCAPTCHA verification logic into a reusable function to reduce code duplication:
+const verifyRecaptchaOrFail = async (recaptchaToken: string | null): Promise<boolean> => { + const isVerified = await verifyRecaptcha(recaptchaToken); + if (!isVerified) { + toast.error(t('Please_check_the_captcha') as string); + return false; + } + return true; +};Then use it in both functions:
-const isVerified = await verifyRecaptcha(recaptchaToken); -if (!isVerified) { - toast.error(t('Please_check_the_captcha') as string); - return; -} +if (!(await verifyRecaptchaOrFail(recaptchaToken))) return;Also applies to: 283-283
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (52)
.github/workflows/check-tsdoc.js(1 hunks).github/workflows/pull-request.yml(2 hunks)Dockerfile(1 hunks)jest.config.js(3 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)public/locales/en/errors.json(1 hunks)public/locales/en/translation.json(2 hunks)public/locales/fr/errors.json(1 hunks)public/locales/hi/errors.json(1 hunks)public/locales/sp/errors.json(1 hunks)public/locales/zh/errors.json(1 hunks)src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.module.css(1 hunks)src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.spec.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnEntry/AddOnEntry.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.module.css(2 hunks)src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.test.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.tsx(6 hunks)src/components/AddOn/support/components/Action/Action.spec.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/AddOn/support/services/Plugin.helper.test.ts(1 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.module.css(2 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementEntry/AdvertisementEntry.module.css(1 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementEntry/AdvertisementEntry.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.module.css(1 hunks)src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Avatar/Avatar.test.tsx(0 hunks)src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx(6 hunks)src/components/EventCalendar/YearlyEventCalender.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/ActionItemCategories/OrgActionItemCategories.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/OrgSettings/General/GeneralSettings.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.spec.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.tsx(7 hunks)src/screens/Requests/Requests.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/Campaigns.spec.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.spec.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/Users/Users.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/Users/Users.tsx(5 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(6 hunks)src/utils/errorHandler.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/utils/errorHandler.tsx(1 hunks)vitest.config.ts(2 hunks)vitest.setup.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- src/components/Avatar/Avatar.test.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.module.css
- src/screens/Users/Users.module.css
- src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- vitest.setup.ts
- src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.module.css
- src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementEntry/AdvertisementEntry.module.css
- src/components/EventCalendar/YearlyEventCalender.tsx
- public/locales/en/translation.json
- src/components/OrgSettings/General/GeneralSettings.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/components/AddOn/support/components/Action/Action.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: adithyanotfound
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2482
File: src/components/AddOn/support/components/Action/Action.spec.tsx:1-8
Timestamp: 2024-11-27T06:37:47.871Z
Learning: In the Talawa-Admin project, the `@testing-library/jest-dom` package is imported globally in `vitest.setup.ts`, so individual test files do not need to import it separately.
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/Campaigns.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 104-104: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (43)
src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementEntry/AdvertisementEntry.tsx (2)
102-102: LGTM: Clean styling implementation
The Card styling using CSS modules and the consistent use of the "t-bold" class for the title follows good practices.
Also applies to: 153-153
154-156: LGTM: Well-implemented start date display
Good addition of the start date display that:
- Provides valuable information to users
- Uses safe date conversion
- Includes proper test id for testing
- Maintains consistency with the existing end date display
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.spec.tsx (1)
1-7: LGTM! Well-documented component test file.
The added documentation header provides clear context about the component's testing scope.
src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/UpcomingEvents/UpcomingEvents.spec.tsx (1)
26-33: LGTM! Well-documented test file.
The documentation header provides clear context about the component's testing scope.
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (1)
141-144: LGTM! Correct migration to Vitest mocking.
The router mock implementation is correct and follows Vitest best practices.
src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.spec.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-183: Overall test implementation looks good
The migration to Vitest has been handled well, and the test coverage is comprehensive. The suggested improvements are mostly enhancements rather than critical issues.
vitest.config.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM! Correct import source for Vitest configuration
The import source change to 'vitest/config' is appropriate for the Vitest testing framework, and the additional SVG plugin import is properly placed.
Also applies to: 5-5
Line range hint 21-36: LGTM! Comprehensive coverage configuration
The coverage configuration is well-structured with:
- Appropriate provider (istanbul)
- Thorough exclusion patterns
- Multiple report formats including HTML and LCOV
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The coverage configuration is correctly set up and working as intended
The verification confirms that:
- The test file patterns in the coverage exclude list (
**/*.{spec,test}.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}) correctly match the test files in the codebase - Other excluded paths like
node_modules,dist,coverage/**,src/test/**are standard and appropriate - The configuration includes comprehensive reporters (
text,html,text-summary,lcov) which provide good coverage visibility - The provider is correctly set to
istanbulwhich is the recommended coverage tool
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if any test files exist in excluded directories
echo "Checking for test files in excluded directories..."
fd -e spec.ts -e spec.tsx -e test.ts -e test.tsx . coverage/ dist/
Length of output: 328
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the test file patterns and their locations in the codebase
echo "Checking test file patterns across the repository..."
fd -e spec.ts -e spec.tsx -e test.ts -e test.tsx
# Let's also check if there are any test files that might not match these patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for potential test files with different patterns..."
fd -t f . | grep -iE 'test|spec'
# Verify the existence and content of any Jest/Vitest config files
echo -e "\nChecking for test configuration files..."
fd -t f -e config.ts -e config.js | grep -iE 'test|jest|vitest'
Length of output: 30348
14-14: Verify SVG component usage in test files
The addition of svgrPlugin is appropriate for handling SVG imports in tests. Let's verify its usage across test files to ensure it's necessary.
✅ Verification successful
SVG plugin configuration is appropriate and necessary
The codebase contains numerous SVG files (45+ in src/assets/svgs/) that are actively imported in multiple source files. While no test files currently import SVGs, having svgrPlugin in the Vitest configuration is appropriate as it:
- Ensures consistent SVG handling across the application and test environment
- Enables future test cases to properly import and test components that use SVGs
- Prevents potential test failures when testing components that import SVGs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for SVG imports in test files to validate the need for svgrPlugin
echo "Checking for SVG imports in test files..."
rg -l '\.svg[\'"]' 'src/**/*.{spec,test}.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}'
# Check for existing SVG files
echo "Checking for SVG files in src..."
fd -e svg . src/
Length of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for SVG imports in test files with proper quoting
echo "Checking for SVG imports in test files..."
rg -l "\.svg['\"]" "src/**/*.{spec,test}.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
# Check for SVG files
echo -e "\nChecking for SVG files in src..."
fd -e svg . src
# Check for SVG imports in all source files to understand usage
echo -e "\nChecking for SVG imports in all source files..."
rg -l "\.svg['\"]" "src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" --type-not test
Length of output: 2123
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for SVG imports in test files (fixed path pattern)
echo "Checking for SVG imports in test files..."
rg -l "\.svg['\"]" -g "*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" -g "*.spec.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" src/
# Check for SVG imports in source files
echo -e "\nChecking for SVG imports in source files..."
rg -l "\.svg['\"]" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" --glob "!*.test.*" --glob "!*.spec.*" src/
Length of output: 601
20-20: 💡 Codebase verification
Migration from Jest setup to Vitest setup is incomplete
The current vitest.setup.ts only imports @testing-library/jest-dom, while src/setupTests.ts contains critical test configurations including:
- Global fetch mock
- Console error/warning handlers
- HTMLMediaElement mocked properties
- Global CSS imports
- Test timeout settings
These configurations should be migrated to maintain consistent test behavior.
- Move the following configurations from
src/setupTests.tstovitest.setup.ts:- Global fetch mock (adapted for Vitest)
- Console error/warning handlers
- HTMLMediaElement mock
- Global CSS imports
- Test timeout configuration
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify vitest.setup.ts existence and configuration
The setupFiles configuration points to 'vitest.setup.ts'. Let's verify its existence and contents to ensure proper test environment setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if setup file exists and contains necessary configurations
if [ -f "vitest.setup.ts" ]; then
echo "Content of vitest.setup.ts:"
cat vitest.setup.ts
else
echo "Warning: vitest.setup.ts not found"
fi
# Check for any Jest setup files that might need migration
fd -g "setup*.{js,ts}" -E "vitest.setup.ts"
Length of output: 283
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check contents of other setup files to ensure all necessary configurations are migrated
echo "Content of setup.ts:"
cat setup.ts
echo -e "\nContent of src/setupTests.ts:"
cat src/setupTests.ts
Length of output: 7138
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: MayankJha014
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2619
File: vitest.config.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T15:54:04.872Z
Learning: In the Talawa-Admin project, `src/setupTests.ts` is defined for Jest, and including it in Vitest causes reference errors.
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.spec.tsx (1)
1-17: LGTM: Clean migration to Vitest
The imports have been properly updated to use Vitest testing utilities while maintaining all necessary dependencies.
src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx (2)
29-29: Component naming follows React conventions
The renaming from orgSettings to OrgSettings aligns with React's PascalCase naming convention for components. However, we should verify that all imports of this component are updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 129-129
✅ Verification successful
Component renaming verification completed - no issues found
The codebase consistently uses OrgSettings as the component name in all relevant imports and route definitions. The occurrences of lowercase orgSettings are only in translation files, documentation comments, and as key prefixes, which are unrelated to component naming conventions.
Key findings:
- Component is correctly imported as
OrgSettingsinApp.tsx - Route definitions in multiple files use the correct
OrgSettingscomponent name - Test files correctly reference the
OrgSettingscomponent - No incorrect component imports found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old component name
rg "orgSettings" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for imports of the new component name
rg "OrgSettings" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old component name without file type restrictions
rg "orgSettings"
# Search for imports of the new component name without file type restrictions
rg "OrgSettings"
Length of output: 4385
4-4: Verify the migration of styles to global CSS module
The change from local to global CSS module (app.module.css) could affect style isolation. Ensure that all required style classes are properly defined in the global stylesheet.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search failed because we didn't have the correct path. Let's first locate the CSS files and then examine their contents to verify the style migration.
Now that we found the correct path of the global CSS module, let's examine its contents and verify what classes are being used in the component to ensure they exist in the global stylesheet.
Style classes have been verified in the global CSS module
The required CSS classes (settingsTabs, headerBtn, settingsDropdown) are properly defined in the global app.module.css file:
settingsTabs: Lines 644-646 (with media query support)headerBtn: Lines 636-638settingsDropdown: Lines 648-650 (with media query support)
The migration to the global CSS module is safe as all the necessary styles are properly defined and maintained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the required style classes exist in the global CSS module
rg -l "settingsTabs|headerBtn|settingsDropdown" "src/**/app.module.css"
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the actual location of app.module.css
fd -e css "app.module.css"
# Let's also check the content of the original file to understand what styles were used
fd -g "*OrgSettings*.css"
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the correct path, let's check the content of app.module.css
cat src/style/app.module.css
# Let's also check the OrgSettings component to see what CSS classes it uses
rg -A 2 "className=" src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSettings.tsx
Length of output: 14735
src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.tsx (3)
302-302: Consistent style class renaming across card components
The className changes from cardBody to containerBody are applied consistently across all Card.Body components. This appears to be part of a systematic style refactoring.
Also applies to: 344-344, 395-396, 438-441
44-44: Component naming follows React conventions
The renaming from organizationDashboard to OrganizationDashboard aligns with React's PascalCase naming convention for components. This is consistent with similar changes in other components.
Also applies to: 489-489
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since we have sufficient information. The search shows that:
- There are no occurrences of the old component name "organizationDashboard" in the codebase
- The new component name "OrganizationDashboard" is consistently used across the codebase in imports, component definitions, and routes
- The component follows React's PascalCase naming convention
Component renaming is correctly implemented
The renaming from organizationDashboard to OrganizationDashboard has been properly implemented throughout the codebase. All references use the new PascalCase name, which follows React's component naming conventions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old component name
rg "organizationDashboard" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for imports of the new component name
rg "OrganizationDashboard" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old component name without file type restrictions
rg "organizationDashboard"
# Search for imports and usage of the new component name
rg "OrganizationDashboard"
# Find all TypeScript and TypeScript React files that might contain the component
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$"
Length of output: 33009
34-34: Verify the migration of styles to global CSS module
The change from local to global CSS module (app.module.css) is part of a larger style refactoring. Ensure that all required style classes (cardHeader, cardTitle, containerBody, emptyContainer, rankings) are properly defined in the global stylesheet.
✅ Verification successful
Style migration to global CSS module is properly implemented
The verification confirms that all required CSS classes (cardHeader, cardTitle, containerBody, emptyContainer, rankings) are correctly defined in the global src/style/app.module.css file and are being used appropriately in the OrganizationDashboard component. The style definitions maintain consistent styling patterns and the migration appears to be complete and correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required style classes exist in the global CSS module
rg -l "cardHeader|cardTitle|containerBody|emptyContainer|rankings" "src/**/app.module.css"
Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the actual location of the CSS module file
fd -e css "app.module"
# Then, let's search for style-related files to ensure we're looking in the right place
fd -e css
# Finally, let's check the content of any CSS modules for these class names
rg "cardHeader|cardTitle|containerBody|emptyContainer|rankings" -l --type css
Length of output: 7659
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific classes in app.module.css
rg "cardHeader|cardTitle|containerBody|emptyContainer|rankings" src/style/app.module.css -A 2
# Also check the original file to see what classes it's using
rg "className" src/screens/OrganizationDashboard/OrganizationDashboard.tsx -A 1
Length of output: 3472
public/locales/zh/errors.json (1)
11-15: Translations Added Successfully
The new error messages have been added to the Chinese locale file. Ensure that the translations are accurate and correctly convey the intended messages.
public/locales/hi/errors.json (1)
11-15: Verify translations with native Hindi speakers
The new error messages appear to be properly structured, but it would be beneficial to have them reviewed by native Hindi speakers to ensure natural language flow and cultural appropriateness.
✅ Verification successful
Hindi translations are consistent and complete
The verification shows that:
- All error message keys are present across all language files (en, fr, sp, zh, hi)
- The Hindi translations maintain semantic equivalence with other languages
- The messages follow proper Hindi grammar and structure
- The error400 message in Hindi provides more user-friendly guidance compared to some other languages
- JSON structure is valid and consistent
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency across all locale files
for locale in en fr sp zh; do
echo "Checking $locale locale..."
if [ -f "public/locales/$locale/errors.json" ]; then
# Verify all keys exist in both files
jq -r 'keys[]' "public/locales/$locale/errors.json" | sort > "/tmp/${locale}_keys"
jq -r 'keys[]' "public/locales/hi/errors.json" | sort > "/tmp/hi_keys"
diff "/tmp/${locale}_keys" "/tmp/hi_keys"
fi
done
Length of output: 1059
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these files to verify the translations exist
for locale in en fr sp zh hi; do
echo "=== Content of $locale/errors.json ==="
if [ -f "public/locales/$locale/errors.json" ]; then
cat "public/locales/$locale/errors.json"
else
echo "File not found"
fi
echo -e "\n"
done
Length of output: 5150
public/locales/fr/errors.json (1)
11-14: Verify translations with native French speakers
While the new validation messages appear correct, it would be beneficial to have them reviewed by native French speakers to ensure natural language flow and cultural appropriateness.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the French translations more comprehensively by comparing them with other locales.
French translations follow standard validation message patterns
The French translations maintain consistent structure with their English counterparts and follow proper French grammar and conventions:
- All messages use the formal "Veuillez" (please) form, appropriate for official communications
- Terminology is accurate: "numéro de téléphone", "niveau d'études", "statut d'emploi", "état matrimonial"
- Messages follow natural French sentence structure and use correct articles and prepositions
While native speaker review is always beneficial, these translations appear professionally done and match standard French validation message patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Compare message structure across locales
echo "Comparing message structure..."
for locale in en hi sp zh; do
if [ -f "public/locales/$locale/errors.json" ]; then
echo "Checking against $locale..."
# Extract error400 message from each locale
jq -r '.error400' "public/locales/$locale/errors.json"
fi
done
Length of output: 1025
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get all validation-related messages from French and English locales
echo "French validation messages:"
jq -r 'with_entries(select(.key | startswith("invalid")))' public/locales/fr/errors.json
echo -e "\nEnglish validation messages:"
jq -r 'with_entries(select(.key | startswith("invalid")))' public/locales/en/errors.json
Length of output: 901
public/locales/en/errors.json (2)
10-10: LGTM: Formatting improvement maintains consistency
The reformatting of the "errorLoading" message maintains proper JSON structure while preserving the message content.
11-15: LGTM: Well-structured validation messages
The new validation messages are:
- User-friendly and clear
- Follow consistent grammatical structure
- Cover all necessary validation states
- Include appropriate HTTP error feedback
src/components/AddOn/support/components/Action/Action.spec.tsx (1)
1-6: LGTM: Well-documented test file
The JSDoc comments clearly describe the purpose of the test suite.
public/locales/sp/errors.json (1)
10-15: LGTM: New error messages properly translated
The new validation messages are well-translated to Spanish with proper grammar and natural phrasing.
.github/workflows/check-tsdoc.js (2)
26-26: LGTM! Consistent test file exclusion pattern
The addition of .spec.tsx exclusion is consistent with the existing .test.tsx exclusion pattern and helps maintain clean documentation checks by focusing on production code files.
Line range hint 1-1: Verify relationship to Postgres migration
The changes reviewed (error handling, CSS styling, and documentation checks) appear to be general improvements rather than Postgres-specific changes. Please confirm if these changes are intentionally bundled with the Postgres migration or if they should be in a separate PR for clearer change tracking.
src/components/AddOn/support/services/Plugin.helper.test.ts (1)
12-23: Verify test coverage for all object properties
While the test object has been expanded with additional properties, the test only verifies the transformation of name and component properties. Consider adding test cases that verify how these additional properties affect the output, if at all.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage is appropriate for the implementation
Looking at the Plugin.helper.ts implementation, the generateLinks method only uses three properties from the plugin object: enabled (for filtering), name, and component (for generating the URL). The test adequately covers these properties by verifying the transformation output. The additional properties in the test object (_id, pluginName, pluginDesc, etc.) are not used in any of the helper methods, so they don't need specific test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Plugin.helper.ts contains logic using the new properties
ast-grep --pattern 'class PluginHelper {
$$$
generateLinks($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the Plugin.helper.ts file
fd "Plugin.helper.ts" --type f
# Then check its content to understand the implementation
rg -A 10 "class.*Plugin" --type ts
Length of output: 4324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of Plugin.helper.ts to understand what properties are used
cat src/components/AddOn/support/services/Plugin.helper.ts
# Also check the test file to see what's being tested
cat src/components/AddOn/support/services/Plugin.helper.test.ts
Length of output: 3724
src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1)
84-90: LGTM! Good use of CSS modules
The update to use CSS module styles instead of hardcoded class names is a good practice. This makes the tests more maintainable and less prone to breaking when class names change.
src/utils/errorHandler.test.tsx (1)
41-49: LGTM! Well-structured parameterized tests
The use of test.each for testing multiple invalid field scenarios is a great approach for reducing code duplication and improving test maintainability.
package.json (1)
30-30: Verify the necessity of customize-cra with Vite
The addition of customize-cra seems unnecessary as the project is using Vite for build tooling. This package is typically used with Create React App and webpack configurations.
Consider removing this dependency if you've fully migrated to Vite, as it's not compatible with Vite's build system.
src/components/OrgSettings/ActionItemCategories/OrgActionItemCategories.test.tsx (1)
219-227: LGTM! Test improvements enhance reliability
The changes improve the test by:
- Consolidating the search input simulation into a single, clear operation
- Making assertions more robust by checking the filtered results length
src/components/AddOn/core/AddOnStore/AddOnStore.test.tsx (2)
25-29: LGTM! Well-structured interface definition.
The InterfacePlugin interface properly defines the structure for plugin objects with appropriate types.
67-78: LGTM! Mock implementation is properly typed.
The generateLinks mock implementation correctly uses the new interface and maintains the expected functionality.
src/screens/Requests/Requests.spec.tsx (3)
23-34: LGTM! Clean migration to vitest.
The localStorage mocking is properly implemented using vitest's stubbing functionality.
40-50: LGTM! Comprehensive window.location mock.
The window.location mock includes all necessary properties and methods for testing redirection behavior.
62-69: LGTM! Well-documented utility function.
The wait utility function is properly typed and documented, making it clear how to use it in tests.
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/Campaigns.spec.tsx (3)
31-36: LGTM: Proper migration of react-toastify mock to Vitest.
The mock has been correctly migrated from Jest to Vitest syntax while maintaining the same functionality.
39-46: LGTM: Correct implementation of async mock for DateTimePicker.
The async mock implementation correctly imports and re-exports the actual component, which is a good practice for maintaining component behavior during testing.
112-118: LGTM: Proper mock implementation for react-router-dom.
The mock correctly preserves the actual module's functionality while mocking only the required useParams function.
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
52-52: LGTM: Enhanced formatting automation.
The change from format to format:fix improves the workflow by automatically fixing formatting issues rather than just checking them.
src/style/app.module.css (1)
1-30: LGTM: Well-structured CSS variables with accessibility considerations.
Excellent use of CSS variables for consistent theming. The high contrast colors are properly documented with contrast ratios, which is great for accessibility.
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx (2)
94-103: Improved type safety for Apollo Client hooks
The type definitions for fetchMore and refetch functions have been properly specified, which enhances type safety and provides better IDE support.
182-186: Enhanced type safety for keyboard event handling
The event type for handleSearchByEnter has been properly typed as React.KeyboardEvent<HTMLInputElement>, improving type safety.
src/components/Advertisements/Advertisements.test.tsx (1)
464-464: LGTM! The array index change correctly targets the expired advertisement.
The change from date[1] to date[0] is correct as it now checks the first advertisement's end date (2023-01-01), which is expired, making the test assertion expect(dateObject.getTime()).toBeLessThan(new Date().getTime()) valid.
src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementEntry/AdvertisementEntry.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This PR needs to be closed. The source and target PR branches are the same. This means that our reviewers will not be able to checkout the changes and test on their systems using this methodology which will cause a rejection error: Please follow these steps:
Closing |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Merge develop-postgres branch into develop branch.
Issue Number:
Fixes: #2667
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes. Verified that all existing and new tests pass.
Snapshots/Videos:
Screencast.from.2024-12-16.21-44-07.webm
Screencast.from.2024-12-16.21-42-48.webm
Summary
This PR merges the latest changes from the
develop-postgresbranch into thedevelopbranch. It resolves all merge conflicts while preserving the new functionality introduced in thedevelop-postgresbranch. The goal is to align thedevelopbranch with the updates and enhancements made indevelop-postgres.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No. All conflicts have been resolved, and tests confirm the integrity of the codebase.
Other information
package-lock.jsonandpackage.json.develop-postgresanddevelop.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Tests
Chores