Develop

[amitb0ra]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

refactoring

Issue Number:

Fixes #2526

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

There is some issue: "Cannot find module '@testing-library/dom' from 'node_modules/@testing-library/react/dist/pure.js'" but that is not relevant here.

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No

Summary

The goal is to convert the CSS file in this subdirectory and all the components related to this screen to use this new design pattern.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Expanded installation guide with detailed setup instructions for the talawa-admin application.
  • Enhanced pull request template to encourage contributors to include tests and visual documentation.
  • Updated workflow messages to clarify reviewer roles and responsibilities.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved checks in the pull request workflow to ensure correct target branches are used.

• Documentation

  • Added comprehensive sections in INSTALLATION.md for configuration, post-configuration steps, and testing.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several enhancements to the project’s documentation and workflow processes. Key updates include modifications to the pull request template to emphasize testing and visual documentation, clarifications in the workflow files regarding reviewer responsibilities and target branch policies, and an expansion of the installation guide for the talawa-admin application. These changes collectively aim to improve contributor guidance and streamline the development workflow.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/pull_request_template.md	Added sections for test confirmation and visual documentation; clarified branching strategy.
.github/workflows/pull-request-target.yml	Enhanced PR review policy message with clearer roles for reviewers and improved formatting.
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml	Refined target branch checks, adjusted environment variable declarations, and improved job dependencies.
INSTALLATION.md	Expanded with detailed setup instructions, configuration steps, and testing commands.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Refactor CSS files in src/screens/SubTags (#2526)	❌	No CSS refactoring changes were made.
Refactor CSS files in src/screens/ManageTag (#2510)	❌	No CSS refactoring changes were made.
Refactor CSS files in src/screens/Requests (#2525)	❌	No CSS refactoring changes were made.
Refactor CSS files in src/screens/OrganizationTags (#2518)	❌	No CSS refactoring changes were made.
Refactor CSS files in src/screens/Users (#2528)	❌	No CSS refactoring changes were made.

Possibly related issues

• Refactor CSS files in src/screens/ManageTag #2510: The PR could potentially address UI/UX improvements related to color blindness through enhanced documentation.
• Refactor CSS files in src/screens/Requests #2525: Similar reasoning as above; improved documentation may indirectly support refactoring efforts.
• Refactor CSS files in src/screens/OrganizationTags #2518: Enhanced guidance could assist in the refactoring process outlined in this issue.
• Refactor CSS files in src/screens/Users #2528: Documentation improvements may aid in understanding and implementing the refactoring tasks.

Possibly related PRs

• Updated pr template with checklist #2454: Enhances the pull request template, aligning with the current PR's updates.
• Updated pr template for develop-postgress branch #2458: Similar to Updated pr template with checklist #2454, it reinforces the changes made to the pull request template.
• fix: pull-request.yml to ignore actions on ignore-sensitive-files-pr and Introspection workflow #2391: Modifies the pull-request.yml to enforce branch targeting, consistent with current PR updates.
• added docker check to workflow #2414: Relates to workflow improvements that align with the current PR's objectives.
• fix failing workflow of TS compilation #2472: Introduces a job for enforcing target branch policy, consistent with the current PR's focus.

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes
• varshith257
• AVtheking
• gautam-divyanshu
• pranshugupta54

🐰 "In the meadow, we hop and play,
With clearer paths to guide our way.
Templates and workflows, oh so bright,
Helping us code from morning to night.
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
Together we build, with joy and no fear!" 🐇

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[github-actions]

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

🛑 Comments failed to post (47)

.husky/post-merge (1)

4-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure accurate detection of package.json changes after merge

The current script uses git diff HEAD^ HEAD, which may not reliably detect changes in package.json after a merge involving multiple commits. Consider using git diff --name-only ORIG_HEAD HEAD to ensure accurate detection.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-git diff HEAD^ HEAD --exit-code -- ./package.json || npm install
+git diff --name-only ORIG_HEAD HEAD | grep -q '^package\.json$' && npm install

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

git diff --name-only ORIG_HEAD HEAD | grep -q '^package\.json$' && npm install

.lintstagedrc.json (1)

2-2: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unsupported file types from ESLint command

ESLint does not support linting .yml files. Including them may cause errors during linting. Remove yml from the ESLint command.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-  "**/*.{ts,tsx,yml}": "eslint --fix",
+  "**/*.{ts,tsx}": "eslint --fix",

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  "**/*.{ts,tsx}": "eslint --fix",

scripts/custom-test-env.js (2)

9-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add explicit return type to 'setup' method

The setup method is missing an explicit return type, which is required by TypeScript linting rules for function return types.

Apply this diff to specify the return type:

 export default class CustomTestEnvironment extends Environment {
-  async setup() {
+  async setup(): Promise<void> {

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  async setup(): Promise<void> {

🧰 Tools

🪛 eslint

[error] 9-9: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)

---

[error] 9-9: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-types)

---

5-5: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix TSDoc syntax error with '@' symbol

The @pdfme in the comment is being interpreted as an undefined TSDoc tag by the linter. To resolve this, wrap @pdfme in backticks or rephrase the comment to avoid starting with @.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

 /**
- * A custom environment to set the TextEncoder and TextDecoder variables, that is required by @pdfme during testing.
+ * A custom environment to set the TextEncoder and TextDecoder variables required by the `@pdfme` library during testing.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

 * A custom environment to set the TextEncoder and TextDecoder variables required by the `@pdfme` library during testing.

🧰 Tools

🪛 eslint

[error] 5-5: tsdoc-undefined-tag: The TSDoc tag "@pdfme" is not defined in this configuration

(tsdoc/syntax)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.md (1)

31-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace 'feature request' with 'bug report'

Line 31 references 'feature request' instead of 'bug report' in the bug report template. This may confuse users filling out the template.

Apply this diff to correct the wording:

-Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
+Add any other context or screenshots about the bug report here.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Add any other context or screenshots about the bug report here.

.github/workflows/codeql-codescan.yml (1)

35-35: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update CodeQL Action Versions to Ensure Compatibility

The versions of the CodeQL actions used (github/codeql-action/init@v2, github/codeql-action/autobuild@v2, and github/codeql-action/analyze@v2) are outdated and may not run properly on GitHub Actions. Please update them to the latest version to ensure compatibility and access to recent features and bug fixes.

Apply this diff to update the action versions:

-          uses: github/codeql-action/init@v2
+          uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3

-          uses: github/codeql-action/autobuild@v2
+          uses: github/codeql-action/autobuild@v3

-          uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v2
+          uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@v3

Also applies to: 41-41, 44-44

🧰 Tools

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

35-35: the runner of "github/codeql-action/init@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

scripts/__mocks__/@pdfme/generator.test.ts (1)

13-19: ⚠️ Potential issue

Await the generate Function to Test the Resolved Value

In the test 'should resolve to a Uint8Array', you need to await the generate function to obtain the resolved value before making assertions. Without await, you're testing the Promise object instead of its resolved value.

Apply this diff to fix the test:

-    const result = generate({
+    const result = await generate({
       template: { schemas: [] } as Template,
       inputs: [],
     });
     expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Uint8Array);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  test('should resolve to a Uint8Array', async () => {
    const result = await generate({
      template: { schemas: [] } as Template,
      inputs: [],
    });
    expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Uint8Array);
  });

.github/pull_request_template.md (1)

4-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistent Branch Names: 'master' vs 'main'

There is an inconsistency in the branch names mentioned:

• Lines 4-7: Reference master as the stable branch.
• Lines 9-11: Mention main as the default branch and indicate PRs against main will be closed.

Please clarify whether master or main is the stable branch to avoid confusion among contributors.

Consider updating the branch names for consistency:

- We employ the following branching strategy to simplify the development process and to ensure that only stable code is pushed to the `master` branch:
+ We employ the following branching strategy to simplify the development process and to ensure that only stable code is pushed to the `main` branch:

- - `master`: Where the stable production ready code lies. Only security related bugs.
+ - `main`: Where the stable production-ready code lies. Only security-related bug fixes.

- ONLY SUBMIT PRS AGAINST OUR `DEVELOP` BRANCH. THE DEFAULT IS `MAIN`, SO YOU WILL HAVE TO MODIFY THIS BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR PR FOR REVIEW. PRS MADE AGAINST `MAIN` WILL BE CLOSED.
+ ONLY SUBMIT PRS AGAINST OUR `DEVELOP` BRANCH. THE DEFAULT IS `MAIN`, SO YOU WILL HAVE TO MODIFY THIS BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR PR FOR REVIEW. PRS MADE AGAINST `MASTER` WILL BE CLOSED.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

.github/workflows/stale.yml (1)

28-28: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update 'actions/stale' action to the latest version

The version v8 of actions/stale is outdated and may not run properly on GitHub Actions. Please update it to the latest stable version to ensure compatibility.

Apply this diff to use the latest version:

-        - uses: actions/stale@v8
+        - uses: actions/[email protected]

Note: Replace v8.1.0 with the latest available version.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    - uses: actions/[email protected]

🧰 Tools

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

28-28: the runner of "actions/stale@v8" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/check-tsdoc.js (1)

26-26: ⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the filesToSkip comparison

The current comparison using path.relative(dir, filePath) may not correctly match filenames in filesToSkip, especially for files in subdirectories. To ensure that files are properly skipped based on their filenames, consider using path.basename(filePath).

Apply this diff:

-            !filesToSkip.includes(path.relative(dir, filePath))
+            !filesToSkip.includes(path.basename(filePath))

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        !filesToSkip.includes(path.basename(filePath))

.github/workflows/push.yml (1)

20-20: ⚠️ Potential issue

Correct indentation on line 20

Line 20 has incorrect indentation: expected 2 spaces but found 4. YAML is indentation-sensitive, and this misalignment can lead to parsing errors.

Apply this diff to fix the indentation:

-    CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME: CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_number }}
+  CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME: CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_number }}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME: CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_number }}

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4

(indentation)

jest.config.js (1)

24-24: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove absolute path in 'modulePaths'

Line 24 contains an absolute path to a local directory, which should be removed or replaced with a relative path. Including absolute paths can cause issues for other developers and CI environments.

Apply this diff to remove the absolute path:

-    '/Users/prathamesh/Desktop/Open-Source/palisadoes/talawa-admin/src',

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js (3)

1-95: ⚠️ Potential issue

Resolve TypeScript linting errors in a JavaScript file

The file check-localstorage-usage.js has a .js extension but is being linted with TypeScript-specific rules (@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type). This causes linting errors such as missing return types on functions. To fix this issue, consider one of the following options:

• Option 1: Rename the file to check-localstorage-usage.ts and add appropriate type annotations and return types to comply with TypeScript standards.

• Option 2: Adjust the ESLint configuration to apply JavaScript linting rules to .js files and TypeScript rules to .ts files. Update the linter to avoid applying TypeScript-specific rules to JavaScript files.

🧰 Tools

🪛 eslint

[error] 10-10: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)

---

[error] 20-20: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)

---

[error] 43-43: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)

---

[error] 89-89: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)

---

[error] 92-92: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)

---

89-92: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing commas in console.info statements

There are missing commas in the console.info function calls, causing Prettier formatting errors. Please insert commas after the messages.

Apply this fix:

console.info(
  '\x1b[34m%s\x1b[0m',
  '\nInfo: Consider using custom hook functions.',  // Added comma
);
console.info(
  'Please use the getItem, setItem, and removeItem functions provided by the custom hook useLocalStorage.\n',  // Added comma
);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    '\nInfo: Consider using custom hook functions.',
  );
  console.info(
    'Please use the getItem, setItem, and removeItem functions provided by the custom hook useLocalStorage.\n',

🧰 Tools

🪛 eslint

[error] 89-89: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)

---

[error] 92-92: Insert ,

(prettier/prettier)

---

23-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace shell commands with Node.js APIs for cross-platform compatibility

Using shell commands like grep in execSync('git ls-files | grep ".tsx\\?$"') may cause compatibility issues on non-Unix systems (e.g., Windows). To enhance portability and avoid dependencies on external commands, consider using Node.js functions to filter files.

Refactor the code as follows:

- const result = execSync('git ls-files | grep ".tsx\\?$"', {
-   encoding: 'utf-8',
- });
- return result.trim().split('\n');
+ const gitLsResult = execSync('git ls-files', { encoding: 'utf-8' });
+ const allFiles = gitLsResult.trim().split('\n');
+ return allFiles.filter(file => file.endsWith('.ts') || file.endsWith('.tsx'));

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      const gitLsResult = execSync('git ls-files', { encoding: 'utf-8' });
      const allFiles = gitLsResult.trim().split('\n');
      return allFiles.filter(file => file.endsWith('.ts') || file.endsWith('.tsx'));

.eslintrc.json (1)

134-134: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Reconsider disabling 'jest/expect-expect' rule

Disabling the "jest/expect-expect" rule allows tests without assertions, which might reduce test effectiveness. Consider enforcing this rule to ensure all tests contain assertions.

Apply this diff to enable the rule:

-    "jest/expect-expect": 0,
+    "jest/expect-expect": "error",

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    "jest/expect-expect": "error",

package.json (2)

155-155: ⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistent version resolution for @apollo/client

You have specified "@apollo/client": "^3.11.8" in dependencies, but the resolutions enforce "@apollo/client": "^3.4.0-beta.19". This conflict may cause the project to use the older beta version instead of the intended stable version.

Consider updating the resolution to match the dependency version or removing it if unnecessary:

-    "@apollo/client": "^3.4.0-beta.19",
+    "@apollo/client": "^3.11.8",

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    "@apollo/client": "^3.11.8",

---

156-157: ⚠️ Potential issue

Mismatch between React versions and TypeScript type definitions

The project uses React 18 ("react": "^18.3.1"), but the resolutions force "@types/react" and "@types/react-dom" to version "17.0.2". This can lead to type incompatibilities and unexpected behavior during development.

Update the type definitions to match React 18:

-    "@types/react": "17.0.2",
-    "@types/react-dom": "17.0.2",
+    "@types/react": "^18.0.28",
+    "@types/react-dom": "^18.0.11",

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    "@types/react": "^18.0.28",
    "@types/react-dom": "^18.0.11",

setup.ts (1)

45-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for file read operations

In several callbacks where fs.readFile is used, the err parameter is not checked. Ignoring potential errors can lead to unhandled exceptions if the file cannot be read.

Include error handling in your callbacks. For example:

 fs.readFile('.env', 'utf8', (err, data) => {
+  if (err) {
+    console.error('Error reading .env file:', err);
+    process.exit(1);
+  }
   const result = data.replace(`PORT=${port}`, `PORT=${customPort}`);
   fs.writeFileSync('.env', result, 'utf8');
 });

Apply similar error checks in other fs.readFile callbacks.

Also applies to: 111-117, 154-159, 174-177

.github/workflows/countline.py (3)

255-255: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use appropriate file encoding when opening files

Opening files with encoding="latin-1" may not handle all characters correctly, especially in source code files that are typically UTF-8 encoded. Consider using utf-8 encoding with error handling for better compatibility.

Apply this diff to change the file encoding:

-            with open(filepath, encoding="latin-1") as code:
+            with open(filepath, encoding="utf-8", errors="replace") as code:

This ensures that non-UTF-8 characters are handled gracefully.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        with open(filepath, encoding="utf-8", errors="replace") as code:

---

261-264: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve comment line detection across different languages

The current logic for skipping comment lines may not account for comment styles in various programming languages (e.g., // for JavaScript, /* */ for block comments). Enhance the detection to accurately skip comments in different file types.

Apply this diff to improve comment detection:

                     and not (
-                        line.strip().startswith("#")
-                        or line.strip().startswith("/")
+                        line.strip().startswith(("#", "//", "/*", "*"))
+                        or line.strip().endswith("*/")
                     )

This addition checks for common comment patterns in multiple languages.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

                    and not (
                        line.strip().startswith(("#", "//", "/*", "*"))
                        or line.strip().endswith("*/")
                    )
                )

---

243-245: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure cross-platform compatibility when checking for 'node_modules'

The current method of checking for 'node_modules' directories may not work correctly on all operating systems due to differences in path separators. Consider using os.path functions to ensure compatibility.

Apply this diff to improve the path checking:

-            if "{0}node_modules{0}".format(os.sep) in filepath:
+            if os.path.sep + "node_modules" + os.path.sep in os.path.normpath(filepath):

Alternatively, you could use os.path.join and os.path.normpath to standardize file paths for reliable detection.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        if os.path.sep + "node_modules" + os.path.sep in os.path.normpath(filepath):
            continue

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)

79-83: ⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid using untrusted inputs directly in inline scripts

Using github.event.pull_request.head.ref directly in scripts can pose security risks. Instead, pass it through an environment variable.

Apply this diff:

       - name: Check if the source and target branches are different
         if: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref == github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}
+        env:
+          SOURCE_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}
+          TARGET_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}
         run: |
-          echo "Source Branch ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}"
-          echo "Target Branch ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}"
+          echo "Source Branch $SOURCE_BRANCH"
+          echo "Target Branch $TARGET_BRANCH"
           echo "Error: Source and Target Branches are the same. Please ensure they are different."
           exit 1

This change secures the script by avoiding direct use of untrusted inputs.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        env:
          SOURCE_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}
          TARGET_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}
        run: |
          echo "Source Branch $SOURCE_BRANCH"
          echo "Target Branch $TARGET_BRANCH"
          echo "Error: Source and Target Branches are the same. Please ensure they are different."
          exit 1

🧰 Tools

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

79-79: "github.event.pull_request.head.ref" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

---

61-63: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix undefined property and quote variables in the ESLint step

The environment variable CHANGED_FILES references steps.changed_files.outputs.all_changed_files, but the correct step ID is changed-files. Also, the variable should be quoted to prevent word splitting and globbing.

Apply this diff:

       - name: Check for linting errors in modified files
         if: steps.changed-files.outputs.only_changed != 'true'
         env: 
-          CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed_files.outputs.all_changed_files }}
-        run: npx eslint ${CHANGED_FILES} && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py
+          CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.all_changed_files }}
+        run: npx eslint "$CHANGED_FILES" && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py

Ensure that the step ID matches and variables are properly quoted.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

          CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.all_changed_files }}
        run: npx eslint "$CHANGED_FILES" && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py

🧰 Tools

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

61-61: property "changed_files" is not defined in object type {changed-files: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)

---

62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 63-63: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

ISSUE_GUIDELINES.md (2)

29-29: ⚠️ Potential issue

Clarify and correct point 1

Point 1 contains duplicate phrases and incomplete sentences, making it unclear.

Revise the point for clarity:

-1. Your issue may have already been created. Search for duplicate open issues before submitting yours.for similar deficiencies in the code.duplicate issues are created.
+1. Your issue may have already been created. Search for duplicate open issues or similar deficiencies in the code before submitting yours to avoid duplication.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

1. Your issue may have already been created. Search for duplicate open issues or similar deficiencies in the code before submitting yours to avoid duplication.

---

5-5: ⚠️ Potential issue

Correct article usage and remove redundancy

The phrase "submit a issues reports" is grammatically incorrect and redundant. It should be "submit issue reports."

Apply this diff to fix the error:

-In order to give everyone a chance to submit a issues reports and contribute to the Talawa project, we have put restrictions in place.
+In order to give everyone a chance to submit issue reports and contribute to the Talawa project, we have put restrictions in place.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

In order to give everyone a chance to submit issue reports and contribute to the Talawa project, we have put restrictions in place. This section outlines the guidelines that should be imposed upon issue reports in the Talawa project.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~5-~5: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...der to give everyone a chance to submit a issues reports and contribute to the Ta...

(EN_A_VS_AN)

README.md (2)

3-3: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update the Slack community link

The link to "Join the community on Slack" points to the GitHub repository instead of the Slack invitation.

Please update the link to the correct Slack invitation URL.

---

51-51: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo: 'documenation' should be 'documentation'

There's a typo in line 51: 'documenation' should be 'documentation'.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-1. It is automatically generated from the markdown files stored in our [Talawa-Docs GitHub repository](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-docs). This makes it easy for you to update our documenation.
+1. It is automatically generated from the markdown files stored in our [Talawa-Docs GitHub repository](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-docs). This makes it easy for you to update our documentation.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    1. It is automatically generated from the markdown files stored in our [Talawa-Docs GitHub repository](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-docs). This makes it easy for you to update our documentation.

.github/workflows/pull-request-target.yml (3)

6-6: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove trailing spaces to comply with YAML syntax

There are trailing spaces on several lines, which may cause YAML parsing issues.

Please remove the trailing spaces on the following lines: 6, 13, 15, 27-29, 31, 33-34, 36, 41, 46, 71.

Also applies to: 13-13, 15-15, 27-29, 31-31, 33-34, 36-36, 41-41, 46-46, 71-71

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 6-6: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

---

71-71: ⚠️ Potential issue

Complete the incomplete sentence

The sentence in line 71 appears to be incomplete: "2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make"

Please complete or correct the sentence for clarity.

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 71-71: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

---

77-77: ⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the GitHub links in the greeting message

The links to the Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines contain an invalid placeholder 'blob/-/'. They should point to a valid branch like 'develop' or 'main'.

Apply this diff to fix the URLs:

-pr-message: "Congratulations on making your first PR! :confetti_ball: If you haven't already, check out our [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/-/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [PR Reporting Guidelines](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/-/PR_GUIDELINES.md) to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR."
+pr-message: "Congratulations on making your first PR! :confetti_ball: If you haven't already, check out our [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [PR Reporting Guidelines](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/develop/PR_GUIDELINES.md) to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR."

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

          pr-message: "Congratulations on making your first PR! :confetti_ball: If you haven't already, check out our [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [PR Reporting Guidelines](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/develop/PR_GUIDELINES.md) to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR."

public/locales/sp/common.json (1)

1-18: ⚠️ Potential issue

Missing Spanish translations

Many strings are still in English instead of Spanish. This includes crucial UI elements like:

• Basic form fields (firstName, lastName, email, password)
• Action buttons (edit, create, delete)
• Navigation items (menu, settings)
• Status messages (loading)

Please provide Spanish translations for these strings to maintain consistency with the localization effort.

Also applies to: 20-38, 41-53

.github/workflows/compare_translations.py (4)

154-155: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure 'en' is in the language list before removing it.

Attempting to remove "en" without checking if it exists can raise a ValueError if "en" is not in the list. Safeguard this operation by checking for its presence first.

Apply this change:

 languages = os.listdir(directory)
-if "en" in languages:
     languages.remove("en")  # Exclude default language directory
+if "en" in languages:
+    languages.remove("en")  # Exclude default language directory

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

---

135-135: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use 'raise ... from e' to maintain exception context.

When re-raising an exception, using raise ... from e helps to preserve the original exception's context, making debugging easier.

Apply this small change:

 except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
-    raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}")
+    raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") from e

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") from e

🧰 Tools

🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

135-135: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)

---

127-135: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add exception handling for missing files and preserve exception context.

The load_translation function does not handle cases where the file does not exist, which can raise a FileNotFoundError. Also, when re-raising exceptions, it's good practice to use raise ... from e to maintain the original traceback.

Apply this diff to handle missing files and preserve exception context:

 def load_translation(filepath):
     """Load translation from a file.

     Args:
         filepath: Path to the translation file

     Returns:
         translation: Loaded translation
     """
     try:
         with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file:
             content = file.read()
             if not content.strip():
                 raise ValueError(f"File {filepath} is empty.")
             translation = json.loads(content)
             flattened_translation = flatten_json(translation)
         return flattened_translation
-    except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
-        raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}")
+    except FileNotFoundError as e:
+        raise FileNotFoundError(f"File not found: {filepath}") from e
+    except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
+        raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") from e

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file:
            content = file.read()
            if not content.strip():
                raise ValueError(f"File {filepath} is empty.")
            translation = json.loads(content)
            flattened_translation = flatten_json(translation)
        return flattened_translation
    except FileNotFoundError as e:
        raise FileNotFoundError(f"File not found: {filepath}") from e
    except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
        raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") from e

🧰 Tools

🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

135-135: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling

(B904)

---

160-176: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Filter only directories and handle missing translation files gracefully.

When processing language directories, ensure that only directories are considered to avoid errors from files that might be present. Additionally, handle cases where translation files might be missing, providing clear error messages.

Apply this diff to improve robustness:

 for language in languages:
     language_dir = os.path.join(directory, language)
+    if not os.path.isdir(language_dir):
+        continue  # Skip if not a directory
     for file in default_files:
         default_translation = default_translations[file]
         other_file_path = os.path.join(language_dir, file)
+        if not os.path.exists(other_file_path):
+            print(f"File {language}/{file} is missing.")
+            error_found = True
+            continue
         try:
             other_translation = load_translation(other_file_path)
         except ValueError as e:
             print(f"Error loading {language}/{file}: {e}")
             error_found = True
             continue
         # Compare translations and get detailed error messages
         errors = compare_translations(
             default_translation, other_translation, f"en/{file}", f"{language}/{file}"
         )
         if errors:
             error_found = True
             print(f"Issues found in {language}/{file}:")
             for error in errors:
                 print(f"  - {error}")

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    for language in languages:
        language_dir = os.path.join(directory, language)
        if not os.path.isdir(language_dir):
            continue  # Skip if not a directory
        for file in default_files:
            default_translation = default_translations[file]
            other_file_path = os.path.join(language_dir, file)
            if not os.path.exists(other_file_path):
                print(f"File {language}/{file} is missing.")
                error_found = True
                continue
            try:
                other_translation = load_translation(other_file_path)
            except ValueError as e:
                print(f"Error loading {language}/{file}: {e}")
                error_found = True
                continue
            # Compare translations and get detailed error messages
            errors = compare_translations(
                default_translation, other_translation, f"en/{file}", f"{language}/{file}"
            )
            if errors:
                error_found = True
                print(f"Issues found in {language}/{file}:")
                for error in errors:
                    print(f"  - {error}")

schema.graphql (11)

67-71: ⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate Definition of AdvertisementType Enum

The AdvertisementType enum is defined twice, at lines 67-71 and 554-558. This redundancy can cause schema validation errors.

To fix this issue, remove one of the duplicate definitions. Since both definitions are identical, you can safely remove the second occurrence. Apply this diff:

- enum AdvertisementType {
-   BANNER
-   MENU
-   POPUP
- }

Also applies to: 554-558

---

776-781: ⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate Definition of OrganizationCustomField Type

The OrganizationCustomField type is defined twice, at lines 776-781 and 783-788. Duplicate type definitions will lead to schema conflicts.

To resolve this, remove one of the duplicate definitions. Since both definitions are identical, you can remove the second one. Apply this diff:

- type OrganizationCustomField {
-   _id: ID!
-   name: String!
-   organizationId: String!
-   type: String!
- }

Also applies to: 783-788

---

244-261: ⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate Definition of EducationGrade Enum

The EducationGrade enum is defined twice, at lines 244-261 and 1223-1240. This duplication may cause schema parsing errors.

To fix this, remove one of the duplicate definitions. Apply this diff to remove the second occurrence:

- enum EducationGrade {
-   GRADE_1
-   GRADE_2
-   GRADE_3
-   GRADE_4
-   GRADE_5
-   GRADE_6
-   GRADE_7
-   GRADE_8
-   GRADE_9
-   GRADE_10
-   GRADE_11
-   GRADE_12
-   GRADUATE
-   KG
-   NO_GRADE
-   PRE_KG
- }

Also applies to: 1223-1240

---

1348-1352: ⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate Definition of UserPhone Type

The UserPhone type is defined twice, at lines 1348-1352 and 1407-1411. This will cause conflicts in the GraphQL schema.

To resolve this, remove one of the duplicate type definitions. Apply this diff:

- type UserPhone {
-   home: PhoneNumber
-   mobile: PhoneNumber
-   work: PhoneNumber
- }

Also applies to: 1407-1411

---

591-591: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the addOrganizationImage mutation at line 591, the file parameter is defined as String!. File uploads in GraphQL are usually handled using the Upload scalar type. Consider changing the type to Upload! for proper file handling.

Apply this diff:

-   addOrganizationImage(file: String!, organizationId: String!): Organization!
+   addOrganizationImage(file: Upload!, organizationId: String!): Organization!

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  addOrganizationImage(file: Upload!, organizationId: String!): Organization!

---

643-643: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the createOrganization mutation at line 643, the file parameter is defined as String. To handle file uploads appropriately in GraphQL, consider changing the type of file to Upload.

Apply this diff:

-   createOrganization(data: OrganizationInput, file: String): Organization!
+   createOrganization(data: OrganizationInput, file: Upload): Organization!

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  createOrganization(data: OrganizationInput, file: Upload): Organization!

---

725-725: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the updateOrganization mutation at line 725, the file parameter is defined as String. For proper file upload handling, please change the type of file to Upload.

Apply this diff:

-     file: String
+     file: Upload

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    file: Upload

---

597-597: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the addUserImage mutation at line 597, the file parameter is defined as String!. For proper file upload handling in GraphQL, use the Upload scalar type.

Apply this diff:

-   addUserImage(file: String!): User!
+   addUserImage(file: Upload!): User!

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  addUserImage(file: Upload!): User!

---

650-650: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the createPost mutation at line 650, the file parameter is defined as String. File uploads in GraphQL are typically handled using the Upload scalar type. Consider changing the type of file to Upload for correct file handling.

Apply this diff:

-   createPost(data: PostInput!, file: String): Post
+   createPost(data: PostInput!, file: Upload): Post

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  createPost(data: PostInput!, file: Upload): Post

---

732-732: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the updateUserProfile mutation at line 732, the file parameter is defined as String. To handle file uploads properly in GraphQL, consider changing the type of file to Upload.

Apply this diff:

-   updateUserProfile(data: UpdateUserInput, file: String): User!
+   updateUserProfile(data: UpdateUserInput, file: Upload): User!

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  updateUserProfile(data: UpdateUserInput, file: Upload): User!

---

698-698: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use the Upload Scalar for File Uploads

In the signUp mutation at line 698, the file parameter is defined as String. In GraphQL, file uploads are typically handled using the Upload scalar type. Please consider changing the type of file to Upload for proper file handling.

Apply this diff:

-   signUp(data: UserInput!, file: String): AuthData!
+   signUp(data: UserInput!, file: Upload): AuthData!

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  signUp(data: UserInput!, file: Upload): AuthData!

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)

INSTALLATION.md (2)

Line range hint 151-184: Fix Docker documentation formatting and enhance security

1. The code blocks have incorrect formatting with extra backticks
2. Consider adding security best practices for Docker

Fix the code block formatting:

-````bash
+```bash
 docker build -t talawa-admin .
-```bash
+```

-```bash
+```bash
 docker run -p 4321:4321 talawa-admin
-```bash
+```

Consider adding these security recommendations:

1. Add instructions for running the container with non-root user
2. Add guidance on setting resource limits
3. Mention the importance of using specific version tags instead of latest

---

203-204: Consider enhancing environment variable documentation

While the environment variable documentation is comprehensive, consider these enhancements:

1. Add validation rules or acceptable formats for each variable
2. Include troubleshooting tips for common configuration issues
3. Add security considerations for production deployments

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)

155-155: Remove trailing whitespace

Remove the trailing spaces after env: to maintain consistent formatting.

-        env: 
+        env:

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 155-155: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3a00c2 and 9b2e55c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/pull_request_template.md (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/pull-request-target.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2 hunks)
• INSTALLATION.md (4 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)

• .github/workflows/pull-request-target.yml
• .github/pull_request_template.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

INSTALLATION.md

[duplication] ~25-~25: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...](#running-talawa-admin) - Accessing Talawa-Admin - [Talawa-Admin Registration](#talawa-admin-registratio...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

INSTALLATION.md

33-33: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

---

34-34: Expected: 4; Actual: 6
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

---

16-16: null
Link fragments should be valid

(MD051, link-fragments)

---

17-17: null
Link fragments should be valid

(MD051, link-fragments)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml

[error] 155-155: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

INSTALLATION.md (1)

Line range hint 184-204: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive configuration instructions

The configuration section effectively covers both automated and manual setup options, making it user-friendly for different skill levels.

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)

316-318: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix unreachable code and incomplete error handling in target branch check

There are several issues with the target branch validation:

1. The first condition lacks an exit 1 statement, allowing execution to continue
2. The second condition for 'develop-postgres' is unreachable
3. According to PR_GUIDELINES.md, only the 'develop' branch should be targeted

Apply this fix to properly handle target branch validation:

-        if: github.event.pull_request.base.ref != 'develop'
-        run: |
-          echo "Error: Pull request target branch must be 'develop'. Please refer PR_GUIDELINES.md"
-        if: github.event.pull_request.base.ref != 'develop-postgres'
-        run: |
-          echo "Error: Pull request target branch must be 'develop-postgres'. Please refer PR_GUIDELINES.md"
-          exit 1
+        if: github.event.pull_request.base.ref != 'develop'
+        run: |
+          echo "Error: Pull request target branch must be 'develop'. Please refer PR_GUIDELINES.md"
+          exit 1

Let's verify the target branch requirements:

[palisadoes]

Closing. None of the files submitted are relevant to the issue to be resolved.

[palisadoes]

1. Please submit your PRs against our develop-postgres branch. To facilitate our reviews, the source and target branches in the PR must be different. The failing test indicates this. Closing.
2. Closing. None of the files submitted are relevant to the issue to be resolved.

[palisadoes]

You were not assigned this issue. Please file our guidelines