Fix typos in docs and tutorials

docs/source/tutorial/Union_tutorial_1_processes_and_materials.ipynb

@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
    "cell_type": "markdown",
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
-    "Let us defined a quick test instrument to see these materials are behaving as expected. First we add a source."
+    "Let us define a quick test instrument to see these materials are behaving as expected. First we add a source."
    ]
   },
   {
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## Adding loggers that show scattering and absorption\n",
-    "In order to check the three materials behave as expected, we add spatial loggers for scattering and absorption. These are called loggers and abs_loggers, here is the parameters for a logger."
+    "In order to check the three materials behave as expected, we add spatial loggers for scattering and absorption. These are called loggers and abs_loggers, here are the parameters for a logger."
    ]
   },
   {
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## Adding the Union master component\n",
-    "The Union master component is what actually executes the simulation, and so it takes information from all Union components defined before and performs the described simulation. This is the component that matters in terms of order of execution within the sequence of McStas components. As all the previous components have described the what the master component should simulate, it has no required parameters. It also does not matter where it is located in space, as it will grab the locations described by all previous Union components that need a spatial location, such as the geometries and loggers."
+    "The Union master component is what actually executes the simulation, and so it takes information from all Union components defined before and performs the described simulation. This is the component that matters in terms of order of execution within the sequence of McStas components. As all the previous components have described what the master component should simulate, it has no required parameters. It also does not matter where it is located in space, as it will grab the locations described by all previous Union components that need a spatial location, such as the geometries and loggers."
    ]
   },
   {

docs/source/tutorial/Union_tutorial_2_geometry.ipynb

@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@
     "The different layers of the cryostat both result in scattering from the aluminium the beam has to move through, but also some increase intensity where it illuminated by scattering from the sample.\n",
     "\n",
     "### Comparing situation with and without cryostat\n",
-    "It could be interesting to see what difference adding the cryostat did to the measured signal in the banana monitor, here we extract the numpy arrays and plot them manually with matplotlib for at direct comparison. Ensure you run the two simulations with the same wavelength in order for a comparison to be meaningful."
+    "It could be interesting to see what difference adding the cryostat did to the measured signal in the banana monitor, here we extract the numpy arrays and plot them manually with matplotlib for a direct comparison. Ensure you run the two simulations with the same wavelength in order for a comparison to be meaningful."
    ]
   },
   {

docs/source/tutorial/Union_tutorial_4_conditionals.ipynb

@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
     "\n",
     "We have two 2DQ loggers recording the scattering vector, one just for the sample and one for the sample environment. On the sample monitor we see that many Bragg peaks scatter some intensity, but 010 and 0-10 have the most intensity, they are at [0.9, -1.5] and [1.5, -0.9]. The two circles are incoherent scattering from the two most common wavevectors, the initial beam and the beam scattered from 010. On the 2DQ logger for the sample environment, we mainly see the Debye-Scherrer cones as lines within the circles defined by the two predominant wavevectors. It seems the used wavelength allows two different Bragg conditions to be met in the aluminium.\n",
     "\n",
-    "The time logger show a surprising amount of complexity. The 5 peaks from entering and exiting two layers and intersecting the sample are clear, but all structure after 0.0012 is a surprise. There is also an unexpected peak at 0.00115, this may be the scattered beam intersecting the outer layer of the cryostat, this happens a bit sooner than the direct beam because the path is shorter when scattered from the front of the sample.\n",
+    "The time logger shows a surprising amount of complexity. The 5 peaks from entering and exiting two layers and intersecting the sample are clear, but all structure after 0.0012 is a surprise. There is also an unexpected peak at 0.00115, this may be the scattered beam intersecting the outer layer of the cryostat, this happens a bit sooner than the direct beam because the path is shorter when scattered from the front of the sample.\n",
     "\n",
     "The time of flight vs 2theta monitor also has a large amount of complexity that is not simple to explain. The bright spot at [0, 0.00155] is the direct beam, while the spot at [60, 0.00155] is the scattered beam. The horizontal line at t=0.00155 must be incoherent scattering from the sample, as it must have had the same distance to all points on the detector. The curved lower branch could be incoherent scattering from where the beam enters the cryostat, as that is closest to the 180 deg point on the detector. The remaining hot spots are all some Debye Scherrer cones from a beam entering or exiting the sample environment, and the more blurry spots may be of even higher order."
    ]
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## Using the final weight option\n",
-    "Here we rerun the simulation with the overwrite_logger_weight option in the conditional turned on to see the effect. Without it a ray is recorded in the loggers if it satisfy the conditional, but it does not matter how large the final weight is. For this reason, some rays with high sampling probability to reach the condition but low weight are represented more than is appropriate. This is mainly important when shielding is simulated, as ray that pass through the shielding needs can be heavily overrepresented."
+    "Here we rerun the simulation with the overwrite_logger_weight option in the conditional turned on to see the effect. Without it a ray is recorded in the loggers if it satisfy the conditional, but it does not matter how large the final weight is. For this reason, some rays with high sampling probability to reach the condition but low weight are represented more than is appropriate. This is mainly important when shielding is simulated, as rays that pass through the shielding can be heavily overrepresented."
    ]
   },
   {

tutorial/Union_tutorial_1_processes_and_materials.ipynb

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
     "| abs_material    | Only has absorption                                              |\n",
     "| powder_material | Has both incoherent and powder process in addition to absorption |\n",
     "\n",
-    "Let us defined a quick test instrument to see these materials are behaving as expected. First we add a source."
+    "Let us define a quick test instrument to see these materials are behaving as expected. First we add a source."
    ]
   },
   {
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## Adding loggers that show scattering and absorption\n",
-    "In order to check the three materials behave as expected, we add spatial loggers for scattering and absorption. These are called loggers and abs_loggers, here is the parameters for a logger."
+    "In order to check the three materials behave as expected, we add spatial loggers for scattering and absorption. These are called loggers and abs_loggers, here are the parameters for a logger."
    ]
   },
   {
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## Adding the Union master component\n",
-    "The Union master component is what actually executes the simulation, and so it takes information from all Union components defined before and performs the described simulation. This is the component that matters in terms of order of execution within the sequence of McStas components. As all the previous components have described the what the master component should simulate, it has no required parameters. It also does not matter where it is located in space, as it will grab the locations described by all previous Union components that need a spatial location, such as the geometries and loggers."
+    "The Union master component is what actually executes the simulation, and so it takes information from all Union components defined before and performs the described simulation. This is the component that matters in terms of order of execution within the sequence of McStas components. As all the previous components have described what the master component should simulate, it has no required parameters. It also does not matter where it is located in space, as it will grab the locations described by all previous Union components that need a spatial location, such as the geometries and loggers."
    ]
   },
   {

tutorial/Union_tutorial_2_geometry.ipynb

@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@
     "The different layers of the cryostat both result in scattering from the aluminium the beam has to move through, but also some increase intensity where it illuminated by scattering from the sample.\n",
     "\n",
     "### Comparing situation with and without cryostat\n",
-    "It could be interesting to see what difference adding the cryostat did to the measured signal in the banana monitor, here we extract the numpy arrays and plot them manually with matplotlib for at direct comparison. Ensure you run the two simulations with the same wavelength in order for a comparison to be meaningful."
+    "It could be interesting to see what difference adding the cryostat did to the measured signal in the banana monitor, here we extract the numpy arrays and plot them manually with matplotlib for a direct comparison. Ensure you run the two simulations with the same wavelength in order for a comparison to be meaningful."
    ]
   },
   {

tutorial/Union_tutorial_4_conditionals.ipynb

@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
     "\n",
     "We have two 2DQ loggers recording the scattering vector, one just for the sample and one for the sample environment. On the sample monitor we see that many Bragg peaks scatter some intensity, but 010 and 0-10 have the most intensity, they are at [0.9, -1.5] and [1.5, -0.9]. The two circles are incoherent scattering from the two most common wavevectors, the initial beam and the beam scattered from 010. On the 2DQ logger for the sample environment, we mainly see the Debye-Scherrer cones as lines within the circles defined by the two predominant wavevectors. It seems the used wavelength allows two different Bragg conditions to be met in the aluminium.\n",
     "\n",
-    "The time logger show a surprising amount of complexity. The 5 peaks from entering and exiting two layers and intersecting the sample are clear, but all structure after 0.0012 is a surprise. There is also an unexpected peak at 0.00115, this may be the scattered beam intersecting the outer layer of the cryostat, this happens a bit sooner than the direct beam because the path is shorter when scattered from the front of the sample.\n",
+    "The time logger shows a surprising amount of complexity. The 5 peaks from entering and exiting two layers and intersecting the sample are clear, but all structure after 0.0012 is a surprise. There is also an unexpected peak at 0.00115, this may be the scattered beam intersecting the outer layer of the cryostat, this happens a bit sooner than the direct beam because the path is shorter when scattered from the front of the sample.\n",
     "\n",
     "The time of flight vs 2theta monitor also has a large amount of complexity that is not simple to explain. The bright spot at [0, 0.00155] is the direct beam, while the spot at [60, 0.00155] is the scattered beam. The horizontal line at t=0.00155 must be incoherent scattering from the sample, as it must have had the same distance to all points on the detector. The curved lower branch could be incoherent scattering from where the beam enters the cryostat, as that is closest to the 180 deg point on the detector. The remaining hot spots are all some Debye Scherrer cones from a beam entering or exiting the sample environment, and the more blurry spots may be of even higher order."
    ]
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
     "## Using the final weight option\n",
-    "Here we rerun the simulation with the overwrite_logger_weight option in the conditional turned on to see the effect. Without it a ray is recorded in the loggers if it satisfy the conditional, but it does not matter how large the final weight is. For this reason, some rays with high sampling probability to reach the condition but low weight are represented more than is appropriate. This is mainly important when shielding is simulated, as ray that pass through the shielding needs can be heavily overrepresented."
+    "Here we rerun the simulation with the overwrite_logger_weight option in the conditional turned on to see the effect. Without it a ray is recorded in the loggers if it satisfy the conditional, but it does not matter how large the final weight is. For this reason, some rays with high sampling probability to reach the condition but low weight are represented more than is appropriate. This is mainly important when shielding is simulated, as rays that pass through the shielding can be heavily overrepresented."
    ]
   },
   {