-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build and publish test containers #309
Conversation
c594c2f
to
5abcedb
Compare
5abcedb
to
ea0709c
Compare
ea0709c
to
05e26fd
Compare
5e60000
to
9e6b8fa
Compare
824e60d
to
8a950e7
Compare
571a185
to
5c3f26d
Compare
57a6a6d
to
9978ce7
Compare
8e4ede9
to
7b7b0e3
Compare
1c24100
to
e40bd8e
Compare
e40bd8e
to
ad35d7c
Compare
Points brought up by running the global behat tests
The regex in Stepup-Build to test the component_info has been extended to include * and /
The forms were not terminated resulting in invalid HTML.
4a39f16
to
ca0536a
Compare
And while at it. Remove the dev SURFnet repo mentions
6beb8b3
to
56aeed1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reviewed @quartjes changes predominantly and also looked at my own changes. I suggest another reviewer looks at this too.
main_syslog: | ||
type: stream | ||
ident: stepup-selfservice | ||
path: "php://stderr" | ||
formatter: surfnet_stepup.monolog.json_formatter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@quartje previously we had a stepup-selfservice ident
indentation in the log entries. This might not be very relevant anymore as the docker logs amend this to the logs. Leave it like this? Or is there a situation where we do want to grep on this ident
value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nul opmerkingen, alleen vraag:
Waarom is nu bij forms name nodig en voorheen niet? Is dat esthetisch of heeft het ook een functie?
Edit by Michiel: [For non Dutch readers], @parijke asked me
Why are forms now set with a name
attribute.
This is purely for testing purposes. Maybe using a data-test attribute would have been more in line with the solution I chose later down the line. But still. I'm happy with this as-is. |
This PR adds a Github action for building a test container, which will be used in behat tests