-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 467
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Config Change] Removes HardReorg config from InboxReader #2542
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Require(t, err) | ||
|
||
// Reorg out the user delayed message | ||
err = tracker.ReorgDelayedTo(1, true) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of just removing this test, we should instead have this test insert an alternative delayed message at position 1 which would cause the same reorg. Instead of getting the delayed count below, we could then get the delayed message to ensure it changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I adjusted the test to trigger a reorg by adding an alternative delayed message through AddDelayedMessages as you mentioned, but the strategy that I implemented is a little bit different than the one you described.
94a07f0
0d584ee
to
94a07f0
Compare
I think there is an issue in the inbox tracker that your test exposed. I pushed up a commit to this branch to fix it. Let me know what you think |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor nit about test readability. Otherwise, this LGTM.
@@ -49,7 +49,22 @@ func TestSequencerReorgFromDelayed(t *testing.T) { | |||
}, | |||
}, | |||
} | |||
err = tracker.AddDelayedMessages([]*DelayedInboxMessage{initMsgDelayed, userDelayed}, false) | |||
delayedRequestId2 := common.BigToHash(common.Big2) | |||
userDelayed2 := &DelayedInboxMessage{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really think it would improve the readability of these tests if we made a little helper method that could return a DelayedInboxMessage built from just the important arguments from the test case. For example, I think the only thing that matters here is that the first message uses delayedRequestId
and the second one uses dealyedRequestId2
, but I have to actually scan all of the lines between 38-51 and between 53-66 to be sure that something else doesn't differ between the two messages.
Also, if it weren't for your comment on line 137, I wouldn't have noticed that the timestamp was different. But, that would have been really clear if we used a helper function to get a "normal" DelayedInboxMessage and then modified the fields on the struct we wanted to change for the test.
Resolves NIT-1349
HardReorg config from InboxReader seems unused so this PR removes it.