Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Layer leap #1764

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Layer leap #1764

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

anegg0
Copy link
Contributor

@anegg0 anegg0 commented Oct 22, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
arbitrum-docs ❌ Failed (Inspect) Dec 13, 2024 2:15am

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the s label Oct 22, 2024

<PublicPreviewBannerPartial />

## Single click bridging from L1 to L3 is now possible with layer leap
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need a few sentences here to explain what layer leap is, why we built it, and how it is implemented.


| Contract | Address |
| --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Arb One L1Teleporter | https://etherscan.io/address/0xCBd9c6e310D6AaDeF9F025f716284162F0158992 |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirming that the addresses for Nova and Arb1 are indeed identical? If they are the same, then maybe we should add a italicized note/sentence that these are the same. Initial reaction from seeing this is that this is a typo

Also any reason why we have 2 rows instead of 1 if the addresses are the same?


## Launch details

_Key timelines & announcements_
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think these sort of info should be much earlier in the page and more obvious. Perhaps a banner at the very top?

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
---
title: 'Layer leap contracts'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it Layer Leap or layer leap?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Layer Leap

### Arbitrum bridge UI: if you are already on the arbitrum bridge UI then you can sign up for layer leap adoption by using this [github template](https://github.com/offchainlabs/arbitrum-token-bridge/issues/new?assignees=&labels=feat%2ctriage&projects=&template=add-layerleap-request.yml&title=%5bfeat%5d%3a+enable+layer+leap+for+%3corbit+chain%3e).

- If you are not on the Arbitrum Bridge UI yet you can sign up by filling out this [GitHub Template](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/arbitrum-token-bridge/issues/new?assignees=&labels=feat%2Ctriage&projects=&template=add-orbit-chain-request.yml&title=%5Bfeat%5D%3A+), and then also fill out the template above.
- You can demo Layer Leap on the Arbitrum Bridge by bridging to [Rari](https://bridge.arbitrum.io/?destinationChain=rari-mainnet&sourceChain=ethereum) and [Proof of Play](https://bridge.arbitrum.io/?destinationChain=pop-apex&sourceChain=ethereum).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps a demo of Layer Leap should be one of the 1st things a user sees/reads in this page.


Sending tokens from L2 to L3 relies on creation of a retryable. If you are supporting Layer Leap for your Orbit chains it’s highly recommended to be running the Retryables Monitoring tool: https://github.com/OffchainLabs/arb-retryables-monitoring. This will allow you to track and redeem any failed retryables

_What configuration options or parameter changes should I consider?_
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels incomplete and I'd argue that, even if it were complete, this info should be available before we give the user a way to adopt it


For non Arbitrum One L3s:

- To enable Layer Leap for your Layer 3 you can follow the Deployment Procedure defined [here](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts/blob/main/docs/info.md). Before self deploying, let Offchain Labs know about your request!
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about for L3s on Nova? It's not clear to me without reading a bit more that a new contract deployment is what is required for L3s on Arb1 and Nova.

Also how does someone contact offchain labs here? We should add a contact link/form.


- To enable Layer Leap for your Layer 3 you can follow the Deployment Procedure defined [here](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts/blob/main/docs/info.md). Before self deploying, let Offchain Labs know about your request!

_Implementation requirements for RaaSes?_
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This probably be its own section since the entire page so far has been aimed at orbit chain owners


_Implementation requirements for RaaSes?_

Sending tokens from L2 to L3 relies on creation of a retryable. If you are supporting Layer Leap for your Orbit chains it’s highly recommended to be running the Retryables Monitoring tool: https://github.com/OffchainLabs/arb-retryables-monitoring. This will allow you to track and redeem any failed retryables
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would probably prefer to see this hyperlinked. Also when we talk about retryables, we should refer to https://docs.arbitrum.io/how-arbitrum-works/arbos/l1-l2-messaging#retryable-tickets

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 26, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants