Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/weechat: Rework module #365208

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

felixsinger
Copy link
Member

@felixsinger felixsinger commented Dec 14, 2024

See commit messages for descriptions.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` labels Dec 14, 2024
@felixsinger felixsinger requested a review from mweinelt December 14, 2024 16:28
@felixsinger felixsinger force-pushed the nixos/weechat/rework branch 5 times, most recently from d8e479f to 54927cc Compare December 15, 2024 01:04
The environment variable hides the actual state directory of weechat in
systemctl. To make it more obvious, use the equivalent CLI parameter.

This doesn't change the current behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <[email protected]>
This option represents a path. So use the corresponding type.

Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <[email protected]>
In preparation for dropping the user home directory, set up the state
directory manually. Use the systemd unit options when /var/lib/weechat
is used and use systemd-tmpfiles for all other locations. Not sure if it
makes any difference. However, it seems systemd tends to control its
directories in /var/lib and so it might make more sense to use the
existing options of the systemd unit.

This doesn't change the current behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <[email protected]>
Configuring an user home directory also enables several invocations and
mechanisms, e.g. SSH authorized_keys or bashrc, which is bad from a
security perspective. The service doesn't need that at all and the
environment is set up over different ways now. So drop it.

This doesn't change the current behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <[email protected]>
Allow specifying a custom weechat package.

Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Dec 15, 2024
@felixsinger felixsinger force-pushed the nixos/weechat/rework branch 2 times, most recently from 817b7af to 4d6bd30 Compare December 15, 2024 03:33
@felixsinger felixsinger marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2024 03:49
@felixsinger felixsinger force-pushed the nixos/weechat/rework branch 2 times, most recently from 29789ba to 5056fe3 Compare December 16, 2024 19:39
weechat can run in TUI or headless mode. Introduce the option
`headless` for specifying that. Based on the setting, it configures
the appropriate binary in the `binary` option and it also configures the
systemd unit accordingly. `headless` is disabled by default.

This doesn't change the current behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant