postgresql_17: init at 17.0 #351253
Merged
postgresql_17: init at 17.0 #351253
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/tds-fdw/tds_fdw/releases/tag/v2.0.4
13 tasks
wolfgangwalther
force-pushed
the
postgresql-17-master
branch
from
9a0f387 to
e01b63a
Compare
wolfgangwalther
force-pushed
the
postgresql-17-master
branch
from
e01b63a to
fd7b7c1
Compare
|
Hm, those build fine for me. Can you see what the error is for you, @kirillrdy?
Those fail on master, too. Haven't looked into that, yet, but shouldn't be critical for this PR. The remaining failures are for PG17. Hopefully those will be resolved over time when more extension updates are available. |
|
you can ignore plr build error, something with my system fails in nix-build, but works in firefox, as for other build failures shouldn't be a blocker |
kirillrdy
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2024
ofborg
bot
added
8.has: package (new)
SuperSandro2000
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2024
|
Will try to take a look today. |
wegank
added
the
12.approvals: 2
|
|
re jit/llvm + lantern, see above: This already fails for 12-16, and also before this update. So unrelated. re timescaledb_toolkit: pg17 is not supported upstream, yet: timescale/timescaledb-toolkit#820 re pgvecto-rs: pg17 is not supported upstream, yet: tensorchord/pgvecto.rs#607 |
Ma27
requested changes
Oct 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I get a different hash for plr:
error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/mxfgna9mmiiykdy1zlbc2qv8fzlznk1z-source.drv':
likely URL: https://github.com/postgres-plr/plr/archive/REL8_4_7.tar.gz
specified: sha256-t5tniqTYNCXb3Q4ii69kr+rx7e9LIkLzlcpqk4X8wiQ=
got: sha256-PdvFEmtKfLT/xfaf6obomPR5hKC9F+wqpfi1heBphRk=
Do you still have the old one so we can investigate what has changed?
Uh, nice catch. Seems like they force pushed the tag, because of a CI failure: https://github.com/postgres-plr/plr/commits/REL8_4_7/ I certainly obtained my hash before October 9, so that last commit is new. For the last two commits I get those hashes now: rev = "ae75fe46aa3d8a2401cc1641ecaf6a31800163b8";
sha256 = "sha256-IlVGqzgJc/B0RrPB3k3UFLVfgXKB9j9FZP3/uJQiTUc=";
rev = "3640a858b3798311ffc90f21c0c3690b046522ac";
sha256 = "sha256-PdvFEmtKfLT/xfaf6obomPR5hKC9F+wqpfi1heBphRk=";One of them matches your hash, but the other one... does not match mine. That's odd... |
|
My hash matches the commit from August 4: postgres-plr/plr@c9e458b So the 3 commits after that had been force pushed. |
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/postgres-plr/plr/blob/master/changelog.md#846---2023-08-01
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/pgroonga/pgroonga/releases
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/cybertec-postgresql/pg_squeeze/releases The changelog is only available for beta 2, but 1.7.0 was released properly after that without changelog.
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: eulerto/pg_similarity@pg_similarity_1_0...master
Also fixes the build on linux with clang (JIT).
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/sraoss/pg_ivm/releases/tag/v1.9
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/citusdata/pg_cron/releases/tag/v1.6.3 https://github.com/citusdata/pg_cron/releases/tag/v1.6.4
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/lanterndata/lantern/releases
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/plv8/plv8/blob/r3.2/Changes
Makes building with PostgreSQL 17 succeed. Changelog: https://github.com/citusdata/postgresql-topn/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#topn-v270-october-18-2024
Broken on linux (JIT) as well.
Broken on linux (JIT) as well.
wolfgangwalther
force-pushed
the
postgresql-17-master
branch
from
fd7b7c1 to
4cc4534
Compare
Maybe we should just mark them as broken to reduce the noise? that would it make way easier for me to merge this PR. |
wegank
removed
the
12.approvals: 2
Agreed. |
Those extensions don't support building with PostgreSQL 17, yet. To make sure they will show up as build failures after the next package upgrade, they all have version checks for their own package version included.
The link_llvm_objects.sh script used a hardcoded /bin/bash shebang, which failed during a JIT-enabled build.
Done - marked all extensions which don't support PG17 as broken with a comment referencing the upstream issue. I also check for the extension's current version to make sure the build will fail instead of being silently marked as broken after the next package update, so that we don't forget checking whether PG17 is then supported. I also fixed
|
Ma27
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2024
13 tasks
|
Hi @wolfgangwalther I'm not sure where to write, hope this isn't too bad of a place. I noticed your comment about TimescaleDB v2.17 dropping support for Postgres 13, and that blocking the upgrade of the package. I don't understand the details of this conflict, however I would like to keep my TimescaleDB and Postgres upgraded to the newest stable version, and was wondering when it will be possible? At the moment, the latest version in nixpkgs is 2.14.2, which was released on 2024-02-20 and is quite outdated. If there is anything I can do to support the update, I would be happy to try. If I could locally build 2.17.2 and somehow use that in my flake, I would also be glad but a link in the right direction would be amazing! |
Not too bad of a place, but even better is #348223. If you could help pushing that forward, e.g. via testing etc., that would be good. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Took the new v17 out of #345260 to target master directly, but left the
postgresql: 16 -> 17over there for later.@Ma27 @SuperSandro2000
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.