Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade fast-xml-parser from 3.12.13 to 4.1.2 #36

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 768/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-FASTXMLPARSER-3325616
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: fast-xml-parser The new version differs by 250 commits.
  • 2b032a4 Update package detail
  • 7a7dbac update package for release
  • b6ee2a5 update tests for #540
  • 62f9e4b common logic to build text and obj node
  • 83069d8 update package for release
  • ed962e0 Merge branch 'dev'
  • c959d13 update package detail
  • 6ebcb14 make eNotation optional
  • 30624d7 Fix '<' or '>' in DTD comment throwing an error. (#533)
  • 40a2176 update package detail
  • 45b01db add missed typing "eNotation"
  • 25f5e8a Fix docs for unpairdTags example in XMLBuilder
  • 007d638 update package for release
  • 7ca95a2 comment unimplemented methods
  • 59eb905 520 preserveorder formatting (#527)
  • 08c59e2 remove space
  • 6689ed2 docs: fix node project example (#522)
  • 0d9d60d Fixed wrong usage in example (#518)
  • a619c48 Add transformAttributeName to transform the attribute name upon parsing. Same logic as transformTagName (#519)
  • f900ef8 Update README.md
  • 9a8d0a7 Update README.md
  • 1ff4e9a update package detail
  • f719751 Update README
  • f962cb5 fix: Builder tag/attributeValueProcessor types (#492)

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution

@guardrails
Copy link

guardrails bot commented Feb 25, 2023

⚠️ We detected 17 security issues in this pull request:

Vulnerable Libraries (17)
Severity Details
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@0.0.10 (t) - no patch available
Medium pkg:npm/[email protected]@2.5.3 (t) - no patch available
Medium pkg:npm/[email protected]@2.99.1 (t) - no patch available
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@4.5.3 (t) - no patch available
Medium pkg:npm/[email protected]@7.3.0 (t) - no patch available
Critical pkg:npm/[email protected]@4.17.15 (t) - no patch available
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@3.0.4 (t) upgrade to: 3.0.5
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@1.6.0 (t) - no patch available
Critical pkg:npm/[email protected]@6.6.0 (t) - no patch available
N/A pkg:npm/[email protected]@2.6.9 (t) upgrade to: 3.1.0
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@0.0.8 (t) - no patch available
Medium pkg:npm/[email protected]@6.1.3 (t) - no patch available
N/A pkg:npm/[email protected]@0.21.1 (t) - no patch available
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@3.0.2 (t) upgrade to: 3.0.5
Medium pkg:npm/[email protected]@2.1.2 (t) upgrade to: 2.1.4
Critical pkg:npm/[email protected]@3.7.2 (t) - no patch available
High pkg:npm/[email protected]@0.5.1 (t) - no patch available

More info on how to fix Vulnerable Libraries in JavaScript.


👉 Go to the dashboard for detailed results.

📥 Happy? Share your feedback with us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant