Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
add a note regarding complex fields and m=0 case to tutorial on nonax…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…isymmetric dipole sources
  • Loading branch information
oskooi committed Jan 19, 2024
1 parent 04fa305 commit 1e314ec
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 167 additions and 157 deletions.
159 changes: 84 additions & 75 deletions doc/docs/Python_Tutorials/Cylindrical_Coordinates.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -609,6 +609,8 @@ Two features of this method may provide a significant speedup compared to an ide

![](../images/cyl_nonaxisymmetric_source_flux_vs_m.png#center)

Note: in a simulation with `m = 0`, the real and imaginary parts of the fields are decoupled. As a runtime optimization, Meep simulates only the *real* part of the fields for this case which roughly halves the number of floating-point operations during timestepping. However, using purely real fields effectively *halves* the current source. Combining the results of the different $m$-simulations correctly using the Fourier-series expansion of the fields requires either setting `force_complex_fields=True` or multiplying the power from the `m = 0` run by four. This tutorial uses the former approach since the cost for using complex fields for only a single run among many is usually insignificant.

As a demonstration, we compute the [extraction efficiency of an LED](https://meep.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Python_Tutorials/Local_Density_of_States/#extraction-efficiency-of-a-light-emitting-diode-led) from a point dipole at $r = 0$ and three different locations at $r > 0$. The test involves verifying that the extraction efficiency is independent of the dipole location. The results are compared to an [identical calculation in 3d](https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/blob/1fe38999997f1825054fc978e473327c77169671/python/examples/extraction_eff_ldos.py#L100-L187) for which the extraction efficiency is 0.333718.

Results are shown in the table below. At this resolution, the relative error is at most ~4% even when $M + 1$ is relatively large (141). The error decreases with increasing resolution.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -645,144 +647,151 @@ import meep as mp
import numpy as np


resolution = 80 # pixels/μm
n = 2.4 # refractive index of dielectric layer
wvl = 1.0 # wavelength (in vacuum)
fcen = 1 / wvl # center frequency of source/monitor
RESOLUTION_UM = 50
WAVELENGTH_UM = 1.0
N_SLAB = 2.4
SLAB_THICKNESS_UM = 0.7 * WAVELENGTH_UM / N_SLAB


def led_flux(dmat: float, h: float, rpos: float, m: int) -> Tuple[float, float]:
"""Computes the radiated and total flux (necessary for computing the
extraction efficiency) of a point source embedded within a dielectric
layer above a lossless-metallic ground plane.
def dipole_in_slab(zpos: float, rpos_um: float, m: int) -> Tuple[float, float]:
"""Computes the flux from a dipole in a slab.
Args:
dmat: thickness of dielectric layer.
h: height of dipole above ground plane as a fraction of dmat.
rpos: position of source in radial direction.
m: angular φ dependence of the fields exp(imφ).
zpos: position of dipole as a fraction of layer thickness.
rpos_um: position of source in radial direction.
m: angular φ dependence of the fields exp(imφ).
Returns:
The radiated and total flux as a 2-Tuple.
A 2-tuple of the radiated and total flux.
"""
L = 20 # length of non-PML region in radial direction
dair = 1.0 # thickness of air padding
dpml = 1.0 # PML thickness
sr = L + dpml
sz = dmat + dair + dpml
cell_size = mp.Vector3(sr, 0, sz)
pml_um = 1.0 # thickness of PML
padding_um = 1.0 # thickness of air padding
r_um = 20.0 # length of cell in r

frequency = 1 / WAVELENGTH_UM # center frequency of source/monitor

# runtime termination criteria
flux_decay_threshold = 1e-4

size_r = r_um + pml_um
size_z = SLAB_THICKNESS_UM + padding_um + pml_um
cell_size = mp.Vector3(size_r, 0, size_z)

boundary_layers = [
mp.PML(dpml, direction=mp.R),
mp.PML(dpml, direction=mp.Z, side=mp.High),
mp.PML(pml_um, direction=mp.R),
mp.PML(pml_um, direction=mp.Z, side=mp.High),
]

src_pt = mp.Vector3(rpos, 0, -0.5 * sz + h * dmat)
src_pt = mp.Vector3(rpos_um, 0, -0.5 * size_z + zpos * SLAB_THICKNESS_UM)
sources = [
mp.Source(
src=mp.GaussianSource(fcen, fwidth=0.1 * fcen),
src=mp.GaussianSource(frequency, fwidth=0.05 * frequency),
component=mp.Er,
center=src_pt,
),
]

geometry = [
mp.Block(
material=mp.Medium(index=n),
center=mp.Vector3(0, 0, -0.5 * sz + 0.5 * dmat),
size=mp.Vector3(mp.inf, mp.inf, dmat),
material=mp.Medium(index=N_SLAB),
center=mp.Vector3(0, 0, -0.5 * size_z + 0.5 * SLAB_THICKNESS_UM),
size=mp.Vector3(mp.inf, mp.inf, SLAB_THICKNESS_UM),
)
]

sim = mp.Simulation(
resolution=resolution,
resolution=RESOLUTION_UM,
cell_size=cell_size,
dimensions=mp.CYLINDRICAL,
m=m,
boundary_layers=boundary_layers,
sources=sources,
geometry=geometry,
force_complex_fields=True
)

flux_air_mon = sim.add_flux(
fcen,
flux_mon = sim.add_flux(
frequency,
0,
1,
mp.FluxRegion(
center=mp.Vector3(0.5 * L, 0, 0.5 * sz - dpml),
size=mp.Vector3(L, 0, 0),
center=mp.Vector3(0.5 * r_um, 0, 0.5 * size_z - pml_um),
size=mp.Vector3(r_um, 0, 0),
),
mp.FluxRegion(
center=mp.Vector3(L, 0, 0.5 * sz - dpml - 0.5 * dair),
size=mp.Vector3(0, 0, dair),
center=mp.Vector3(r_um, 0, 0.5 * size_z - pml_um - 0.5 * padding_um),
size=mp.Vector3(0, 0, padding_um),
),
)

sim.run(
mp.dft_ldos(fcen, 0, 1),
until_after_sources=mp.stop_when_fields_decayed(
50.0,
mp.Er,
src_pt,
1e-8,
mp.dft_ldos(frequency, 0, 1),
until_after_sources=mp.stop_when_dft_decayed(
tol=flux_decay_threshold
),
)

flux_air = mp.get_fluxes(flux_air_mon)[0]
radiated_flux = mp.get_fluxes(flux_mon)[0]

if rpos == 0:
dV = np.pi / (resolution**3)
else:
dV = 2 * np.pi * rpos / (resolution**2)
# volume of the ring current source
delta_vol = 2 * np.pi * rpos_um / (RESOLUTION_UM**2)

# total flux from point source via LDOS
flux_src = -np.real(sim.ldos_Fdata[0] * np.conj(sim.ldos_Jdata[0])) * dV
source_flux = (-np.real(sim.ldos_Fdata[0] * np.conj(sim.ldos_Jdata[0])) *
delta_vol)

print(f"flux-cyl:, {rpos:.2f}, {m:3d}, {flux_src:.6f}, {flux_air:.6f}")
print(f"flux-cyl:, {rpos_um:.2f}, {m:3d}, "
f"{source_flux:.6f}, {radiated_flux:.6f}")

return flux_air, flux_src
return radiated_flux, source_flux


if __name__ == "__main__":
layer_thickness = 0.7 * wvl / n
dipole_height = 0.5

# r = 0 source requires a single simulation with m = ±1
rpos = 0
# An Er source at r = 0 needs to be slightly offset.
# https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/issues/2704
dipole_rpos_um = 1.5 / RESOLUTION_UM

# Er source at r = 0 requires a single simulation with m = ±1.
m = 1
flux_air, flux_src = led_flux(
layer_thickness,
radiated_flux, source_flux = dipole_in_slab(
dipole_height,
rpos,
dipole_rpos_um,
m,
)
ext_eff = flux_air / flux_src
print(f"exteff:, {rpos}, {ext_eff:.6f}")

# r > 0 source requires Fourier-series expansion of φ
flux_tol = 1e-5 # threshold flux to determine when to truncate expansion
rpos = [3.5, 6.7, 9.5]
for rp in rpos:
flux_src_tot = 0
flux_air_tot = 0
flux_air_max = 0
extraction_efficiency = radiated_flux / source_flux
print(f"exteff:, {dipole_rpos_um}, {extraction_efficiency:.6f}")

# Er source at r > 0 requires Fourier-series expansion of φ.

# Threshold flux to determine when to truncate expansion.
flux_decay_threshold = 1e-2

dipole_rpos_um = [3.5, 6.7, 9.5]
for rpos_um in dipole_rpos_um:
source_flux_total = 0
radiated_flux_total = 0
radiated_flux_max = 0
m = 0
while True:
flux_air, flux_src = led_flux(
layer_thickness,
radiated_flux, source_flux = dipole_in_slab(
dipole_height,
rp,
rpos_um,
m,
)
flux_air_tot += flux_air if m == 0 else 2 * flux_air
flux_src_tot += flux_src if m == 0 else 2 * flux_src
if flux_air > flux_air_max:
flux_air_max = flux_air
if m > 0 and (flux_air / flux_air_max) < flux_tol:
break
m += 1
radiated_flux_total += radiated_flux * (1 if m == 0 else 2)
source_flux_total += source_flux * (1 if m == 0 else 2)

if radiated_flux > radiated_flux_max:
radiated_flux_max = radiated_flux

ext_eff = flux_air_tot / flux_src_tot
print(f"exteff:, {rp}, {ext_eff:.6f}")
if (m > 0 and
(radiated_flux / radiated_flux_max) < flux_decay_threshold):
break
else:
m += 1

extraction_efficiency = radiated_flux_total / source_flux_total
print(f"exteff:, {rpos_um}, {extraction_efficiency:.6f}")
```
Loading

0 comments on commit 1e314ec

Please sign in to comment.