New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

I believe this text mining result was false. The paper looked at a rat model with higher and lower glucose levels but it doesn't look like they actually did transcriptomics for this portion of their experiment. Their cell model results are here https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/?acc=GSE169649 and even if you accept the jump of O-GlyNAc being a proxy of glucose, the numbers don't show any increase in KMT2A that I could find. The "Title" sections had conflicting information from the "Treatment" sections but analyzing based on Treatment (except for day 12) looked like it had more sensical PCA plots. Even then, I analysed D0, D12, D30, and D70 and never found an instance of KMT2A being elevated. #980

Open

TranslatorIssueCreator opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments

TranslatorIssueCreator commented Dec 12, 2024

Type: Other Comment

URL: null

ARS PK: 2bf9562b-3547-4a77-aec6-5210cca007f8

Steps to reproduce:

Screenshots:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment