Remove tradepubkey #79
Conversation
Add new Payload enum variant for NextTrade fields, this will be used only on messages with action release and fiat-sent by the maker of a range order
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces updates to the Mostro Core package, specifically updating the package version from 0.6.23 to 0.6.24 and upgrading the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/message.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-456: Ensure proper version handling for breaking changesThe removal of
TradePubkeyis a breaking change. Consider:
- Adding a version check in the message handling logic to maintain backward compatibility
- Documenting the breaking changes in the changelog
- Following semantic versioning guidelines for the version bump
Let's verify the version handling:
#!/bin/bash # Check for version-related code rg "PROTOCOL_VER|version" --type rust # Look for changelog files fd -g "CHANGELOG*"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Cargo.toml(2 hunks)src/message.rs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Cargo.toml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/message.rs (1)
Line range hint
35-104: Verify impact of removing TradePubkey variantThe removal of the
TradePubkeyvariant from theActionenum is a breaking change. Please ensure:
- All code paths handling this variant have been updated
- Migration documentation is provided for existing users
Let's verify there are no remaining references to
TradePubkey:✅ Verification successful
TradePubkey variant removal is safe
The verification shows no remaining references to the
TradePubkeyvariant in the codebase. The trade pubkey fields found inorder.rsare unrelated struct fields and not connected to theActionenum. The removal appears to be a cleanup of unused code rather than a breaking change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to TradePubkey rg "TradePubkey|trade.?pubkey" --type rust -i # Search for tests that might need updating rg "test.*trade.*pubkey" --type rust -iLength of output: 410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for match/if let/when patterns with Action enum rg "match.*Action|if let.*Action|when.*Action|->.*Action" -A 3 --type rust # Search for any direct Action:: usage rg "Action::" --type rustLength of output: 3150
| @@ -260,6 +259,7 @@ pub enum Payload { | |||
| Amount(Amount), | |||
| Dispute(Uuid, Option<u16>), | |||
| CantDo(Option<CantDoReason>), | |||
| NextTrade(String, u32), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add verification logic for NextTrade payload
The NextTrade variant has been added to the Payload enum, but the implementation appears incomplete:
- No corresponding
Actionenum variant to handle this payload type - Missing verification logic in
MessageKind::verify()method - No documentation explaining the parameters
Please ensure all these components are implemented to maintain message validation integrity.
🔗 Analysis chain
Add documentation for the NextTrade variant
The new NextTrade variant lacks documentation explaining the purpose of its parameters. Please add documentation to clarify:
- The purpose of the String parameter
- The purpose of the u32 parameter
- When this payload should be used
Additionally, verify if this variant needs handling in the MessageKind::verify() method by running:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any existing message verification logic related to NextTrade
rg -l "NextTrade" --type rust
Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get context around NextTrade in message.rs
rg -B 5 -A 5 "NextTrade" --type rust
# Look for verify method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fn verify(&self) -> Result<(), Error> {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for verify method with broader context
rg "fn verify" -B 2 -A 15 --type rust
# Also look for any NextTrade handling
rg "match.*NextTrade" -A 5 --type rust
Length of output: 2508
Summary by CodeRabbit
Dependency Updates
0.6.24bitcoin_hashesdependency to version0.16.0API Changes
TradePubkeyaction variantOrder,PaymentRequest,TextMessage,Peer,RatingUser,Amount,Dispute,CantDo, andNextTradefor enhanced messaging capabilities