-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 899
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrading ruby to 3.3 #23142
Upgrading ruby to 3.3 #23142
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -14,9 +14,7 @@ jobs: | |
strategy: | ||
matrix: | ||
ruby-version: | ||
- '3.0' | ||
- '3.1' | ||
- '3.2' | ||
- '3.3' | ||
test-suite: | ||
- vmdb | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ | ||
raise "Ruby versions < 3.0.1 are unsupported!" if RUBY_VERSION < "3.0.1" | ||
warn "Ruby versions >= 3.2.0 are untested!" if RUBY_VERSION >= "3.2.0" | ||
raise "Ruby versions >= 3.4.0 are unsupported!" if RUBY_VERSION >= "3.4.0" | ||
|
||
ruby ">= 3.1.1", "< 3.5.0" | ||
warn "Ruby versions >= 3.4.0 are untested!" if RUBY_VERSION >= "3.4.0" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Does this resolve the issue around rubocop and warning for testing of untested rubies? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes. adding the padding on the top ( |
||
source 'https://rubygems.org' | ||
|
||
plugin "bundler-inject", "~> 2.0" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kbrock Even if we jump from 3.1 to 3.3 in a release, we should include 3.2 with 3.3 so if they fail in CI, we can determine if it's a problem unique to 3.3 or also a problem in 3.2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, since we will never use 3.2, I'm mixed on this one.
Already got 2 thumbs up, so I'll add it.
But it seems a waste of cycles and unnecessary granularity