Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix typos in the comment about integration by parts
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
LorenzoLuccioli committed Sep 2, 2024
1 parent 1f00539 commit 9c710b1
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions TestingLowerBounds/ForMathlib/ByParts.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,16 +9,16 @@ http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-formula-for-integration-by-parts-of-riemann-st
Mathematical analysis, Tom M. Apostol, 5th edition [2] theorem 7.6, page 144 (seems similar to the previous link, in the link it is a bit longer, but maybe it's just that it has more details)
The integrals of Lebesgue, Denjoy, Perron, and Henstock [3], theorem 12.14
See also https://math.ryerson.ca/~niushan/Stieltjes-integrals.pdf [4] and Measure and Integration [5], Wheeden and Zygmund, for some facts about Riemann-Stieltjes and Lebesgue integrals.
See also https://math.ryerson.ca/~niushan/Stieltjes-integrals.pdf [4] and Measure and Integral [5], Wheeden and Zygmund, for some facts about Riemann-Stieltjes and Lebesgue integrals.
Here I am stating the results in terms of interval integrals, since it is what I need and the RS integral is equal to the Lebesgue one if one of the functions is increasing and right continuous and the other is bounded and measurable (see 4.1 in the previous link).
To prove the general result it may be better to develop a theory of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral in mathlib and then prove the results for that integral and translate them for the lebesgue integral when possible.
To be sure that the result is correct:
Our integral is the same as the Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral defined in chapter 11.3 of [5], theorem 11.11 in [4] assures us that this integral corresponds to the Riemann-Stieltjes one in the case of a monotone right-continuous function and a bounded Borel-measurable one, if the Riemann-Stieltjes integral exists.
Then theorem 4.7 in [2] says that for `f α : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f` is Rieman-Stieltjes integrable with respect to `α` on `[a, b]` then `α` is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to `f` on `[a, b]` and `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂α + ∫ x in a..b, α x ∂f = f b * α b - f a * α a `.
Our integral is the same as the Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral defined in chapter 11.3 of [5], theorem 11.11 in [5] assures us that this integral corresponds to the Riemann-Stieltjes one in the case of a monotone right-continuous function and a bounded Borel-measurable one, if the Riemann-Stieltjes integral exists.
Then theorem 7.6 in [2] says that for `f α : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f` is Rieman-Stieltjes integrable with respect to `α` on `[a, b]` then `α` is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to `f` on `[a, b]` and `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂α + ∫ x in a..b, α x ∂f = f b * α b - f a * α a `.
Moreover theorem 7.27 of [2] says that if `f` is continuous on `[a, b]` and `α` is of bounded variation on `[a, b]` then `f` is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to `α` on `[a, b]`, the same is true if `f` is of bounded variation and `α` is continuous.
In our case both functions are Stieltjes functions, hence they are of bounded variation, bounded on finite intervals and Borel measurable. However we also need to ask for one of the functions to be continuous, otherwise the Riemann-Stieltjes integral may not be true, for example if `f` and `α` have a common point of left discontinuity (see theorem 7.29 in [2]).
In our case both functions are Stieltjes functions, hence they are of bounded variation, bounded on finite intervals and Borel measurable. However we also need to ask for one of the functions to be continuous, otherwise the Riemann-Stieltjes integral may not be well defined, for example if `f` and `α` have a common point of left discontinuity (see theorem 7.29 in [2]).
-/
-- #check intervalIntegral.integral_deriv_mul_eq_sub_of_hasDeriv_right --one of the versions of the integration by parts that is currently in mathlib.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9c710b1

Please sign in to comment.