changed hit printing #13
Conversation
denote the particle barcode for all hits instead of only for first hit and “?” for others. before: 100000720,10000050,[566.19733899495418, 824.26972121692847] 100000520, ?,[1004.8522372399623, 1729.2402902181764] 100000230, ?,[1304.9914538841922, 2701.2954864822213] 100000080, ?,[1455.0021635262074, 3725.9856017078287] 100000950, ?,[1442.1755673331181, 4787.4972201545352] 100000410, ?,[1252.1010433407478, 5867.8993666613787] 100000460, ?,[867.75234154604095, 6946.0064694572065] 100000070, ?,[267.98619794832985, 7995.5102024642056] after: 100000390,10000020,[-894.22687954837522, -447.61399429997255] 100000250,10000020,[-1850.7827589599983, -758.02584331698006] 100000290,10000020,[-2854.7188327693616, -922.26915042840665] 100000750,10000020,[-3890.1799170026334, -930.85993218603517] 100000650,10000020,[-4939.8196377253798, -773.42223057182923] 100000180,10000020,[-5983.9773128737861, -438.19575421473837] 100000630,10000020,[-6999.4379253225452, 88.705859763765602] 100000570,10000020,[-7957.397825154123, 824.51188725962993]
| @@ -45,6 +45,5 @@ def plotHit(self): | |||
|
|
|||
| def printHit(self, dataset = False): | |||
| """ print hit to stdout """ | |||
| if dataset and self.detpos != 0 and self.detpos != 1: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tboser did this have a purpose? Is the bugfix ok?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When creating a dataset for participants we don't want them to have particle barcodes attributed to all the hits, they will need to do that themselves using their reconstruction algorithm. I understood we'd give them a barcode for the first hit (that intersects the first detector), and they'd find all other hits they believe can be attributed to that particle (barcode). Most hits will have '?' for the barcode and they'll need to change that to a particle barcode. This will work so they could potentially return their solution in the format:
particle barcode 1, [hitbc1.1, hitbc2.1, hitbc3.1 etc]
particle barcode 2, [hitbc1.2, 2.2, 3.2 etc]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's worth noting that my method also printed out all the barcodes if dataset == False
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I understand. In that case if you plan on generating datasets you won't be giving particle barcodes and the reconstruction algorithm will return sets of hits?
Generation of data, Reconstruction of Tracks and Analysis of predictions are splitted into separate directories for more convenient development in parallel.
denote the particle barcode for all hits instead of only for first hit
and “?” for others.
before:
100000720,10000050,[566.19733899495418, 824.26972121692847]
100000520, ?,[1004.8522372399623, 1729.2402902181764]
100000230, ?,[1304.9914538841922, 2701.2954864822213]
100000080, ?,[1455.0021635262074, 3725.9856017078287]
100000950, ?,[1442.1755673331181, 4787.4972201545352]
100000410, ?,[1252.1010433407478, 5867.8993666613787]
100000460, ?,[867.75234154604095, 6946.0064694572065]
100000070, ?,[267.98619794832985, 7995.5102024642056]
after:
100000390,10000020,[-894.22687954837522, -447.61399429997255]
100000250,10000020,[-1850.7827589599983, -758.02584331698006]
100000290,10000020,[-2854.7188327693616, -922.26915042840665]
100000750,10000020,[-3890.1799170026334, -930.85993218603517]
100000650,10000020,[-4939.8196377253798, -773.42223057182923]
100000180,10000020,[-5983.9773128737861, -438.19575421473837]
100000630,10000020,[-6999.4379253225452, 88.705859763765602]
100000570,10000020,[-7957.397825154123, 824.51188725962993]