Support for 700 series Robot Vacuum

[ivancoppa]

I have added basic support for the 700 Series Robot Vacuum, the successor to the PUREi9 Series, which differs from the PUREi9 in terms of capabilities.

In this version, support for the 700 Series Vacuum Mode (also known as Power Mode in PUREi9) is not yet included, as I am still determining the best approach to implement this feature.

However, this basic implementation should allow users to set up essential automations.

This implementation provides basic vacuum support for the following models:

Electrolux

• Clean 600
• Hygienic 600
• Hygienic 700
• Ultimate 700

AEG

• 6000 Robot Vacuum Cleaner
• 7000 Robot Vacuum Cleaner

[JohNan]

Thank you! It looks great! Well done.

[ivancoppa]

Thank you!

It would be greatly appreciated if @joakimjalden and @derkrasseleo could also verify that this update doesn’t cause any regressions with the PUREi9 and PUREi9.2 models.

[joakimjalden]

It would be greatly appreciated if @joakimjalden and @derkrasseleo could also verify that this update doesn’t cause any regressions with the PUREi9 and PUREi9.2 models.

@ivancoppa Functionally it works (start, pause, stop, return) but the addition messes up the battery status. The battery status of the PUREi9 is reported as an integer number in the range of 1 to 6, not a percentage. The change makes the integration report a full battery on the PUREi9.2 as only 6% full. I have not had time to debug in my development environment (and will not be able to for a few days) but I would assume that something goes wrong with the battery_range property on line 398 in api.py.

It will also (because of how the overall integration is implemented) add the Robot700series_entities "Battery Status" sensor as a percentage sensor that is always between 1 and 6 for the PUREi9. Not sure how to best fix that.

[joakimjalden]

...and out of curiosity, do the newer models report any capabilities for maps and cleaning zones? Could you post the "capabilities" part of the reply to the appliance info call?

[derkrasseleo]

Can confirm, battery status shows 6% for me, even though the robot was charging all day..

[joakimjalden]

@ivancoppa Also, a suggestion is to change line 56 in vacuum.py to VACUUM_CHARGING_STATES = [9, 'sleeping'] or VACUUM_CHARGING_STATES = [9, 'idle'] and then line 114 to charging = self.get_entity.state in VACUUM_CHARGING_STATES so that the new models also get the little lightning bolt by the battery when charging.

[ivancoppa]

@derkrasseleo @joakimjalden, thanks so much for checking!
I hope to work on a fix tomorrow and implement your suggestions.

...and out of curiosity, do the newer models report any capabilities for maps and cleaning zones? Could you post the "capabilities" part of the reply to the appliance info call?

From what I observed, it doesn’t seem to support cleaning zones, it just draws the map in the app.

[joakimjalden]

@ivancoppa I was mucking about in the code today, and I have another suggestion for the 700 series support. When implementing the PUREi9 support, I got the (good) suggestion to give the Vacuum Entity a default friendly name based on the appliance name; see

#146 (comment)

I'm assuming the change would be a simple change of line 223 in ´api.py` to 206. Maybe we should also consolidate the naming convention (now "Vacuum" for PUREi9 and "Robot Status" for the 700 series).

[ivancoppa]

Good point @joakimjalden,
I'll try to have a look during the weekend.