Note
This project is in alpha, significant changes and additions are expected.
Low-level card sorting utilities to compare card sorts — including calculating edit distances, d-neighbourhoods, d-cliques, and orthogonality of card sorts.
It is recommended to read Deibel et al. (2005)1 and Fossum & Haller (2005)2 to familiarize yourself with the metrics covered in this library. In fact, that entire special issue of Expert Systems is excellent reading for anyone interested in analysing card sorting data.
pip install cardy
Card sorts are represented as collections of sets of cards: Colection[Set[T]]
where each set represents a group.
The edit distance between two sorts can be computed with the distance function:
from cardy import distance
sort1 = ({1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9})
sort2 = ({1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6, 7}, {8, 9})
dist = distance(sort1, sort2)
print("Distance:", dist) # Distance: 3
When comparing sorts for equality, assert an edit distance of zero:
if distance(sort1, sort2) == 0:
...
Cliques and neighbourhoods can be calculated using the clique
and neighbourhood
functions. Given a mapping of sort IDs to card sorts:
Mapping[K, Collection[Set[T]]]
, a neighbourhood or clique is represented as a
set of IDs: Set[K]
of card sorts
Neighbourhoods are always deterministic:
from cardy import neighbourhood
probe = ({1, 2, 3, 4, 5},)
sorts = {
0: ({1, 2, 3}, {4, 5}),
1: ({1, 2, 3}, {4, 5}, set()),
2: ({1, 2}, {3}, {4, 5}),
3: ({1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5}),
4: ({1, 2, 4}, {3, 5}),
}
two_neighbourhood = neighbourhood(2, probe, sorts)
print(f"2-neighbourhood around `{probe}`: {two_neighbourhood}")
# 2-neighbourhood around `({1, 2, 3, 4, 5},)`: {0, 1, 4}
Cliques can be non-deterministic — even when using a greedy strategy (default):
from cardy import clique
probe = ({1, 2}, {3})
sorts = {
0: ({1}, {2}, {3}),
1: ({2, 3}, {1}),
2: ({1, 2, 3},),
}
one_clique = clique(1, probe, sorts)
print(f"1-clique around `{probe}`: {one_clique}")
# 1-clique around `({1, 2}, {3})`: {0, 1}
# OR
# 1-clique around `({1, 2}, {3})`: {1, 2}
The clique function allows for various heuristic strategies for selecting
candidate card sorts (via ID). Heuristic functions are of the form:
(int, Mapping[K, Collection[Set[T]]]) -> K
— that is, a function that takes
a the maximum clique diameter and a key to card sort mapping of viable
candidates, and returns a key of a viable candidate based on some heuristic.
Two heuristic functions have been provided: random_strategy
and
greedy_strategy
. random_strategy
will select a candidate at random.
greedy_strategy
will select a candidate that reduces the size of the
candidate pool by the smallest amount. In the case two or more candidates
reduce the pool by the same amount, one is selected at random.
This behaviour can be changed by providing a deterministic heuristic function,
or a deterministic Selector
which provides a select method that picks a
candidate in the case of ambiguity:
from cardy import clique
from cardy.clique import Selector, greedy_strategy
class MinSelector(Selector):
def select(self, collection):
# selects the candidate with the smallest key in case of ties
# for greedy strategy
return min(collection)
probe = ({1, 2}, {3})
sorts = {
0: ({1}, {2}, {3}),
1: ({2, 3}, {1}),
2: ({1, 2, 3},),
}
one_clique = clique(
1,
probe,
sorts,
strategy=lambda d, c: greedy_strategy(d, c, MinSelector())
)
print(f"1-clique around `{probe}`: {one_clique}")
# 1-clique around `({1, 2}, {3})`: {0, 1}
Alternatively, a seed can be passed to the base Selector
constructor.
The orthogonality of a collection of sorts can be calculated with the
orthogonality
function:
from cardy import orthogonality
p1 = (
({1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23},
{2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26}),
({1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 23, 26},
{2, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25}),
({1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25},
{3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 23, 26}),
)
p1_orthogonality = orthogonality(p1)
print(f"P1 orthogonality: {p1_orthogonality:.2f}") # P1 orthogonality: 2.33
Footnotes
-
Deibel, K., Anderson, R. and Anderson, R. (2005), Using edit distance to analyze card sorts. Expert Systems, 22: 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2005.00304.x ↩
-
Fossum, T. and Haller, S. (2005), Measuring card sort orthogonality. Expert Systems, 22: 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2005.00305.x ↩