another set of solutions

01-introduction-to-hott/solutionsMevenLennonBertrand.v

@@ -0,0 +1,360 @@
+(* If loading this file in emacs, remove first the last few lines that force to call `hoqtop` and rather use the `_CoqProject` method described in the installation instructions *)
+
+From HoTT Require Import HoTT.
+
+(* This file formalizes the exercises from the lectures "Introduction to HoTT". *)
+
+Section Part_1_Martin_Lof_Type_Theory.
+
+  Section Exercise_1_1.
+
+    (* Construct an element of
+
+       (Π (x:A) . Σ (y:B) . C x y) → Σ (f : A → B) . Π (x : A) . C x (f x).
+    *)
+
+    Theorem Exercise_1_1 (A : Type) (B : Type) (C : A -> B -> Type) :
+      (forall x, { y : B & C x y}) -> { f: A -> B & forall x, C x (f x) }.
+    Proof.
+      intros g.
+      exists (fun x => (g x).1).
+      intros x.
+      case (g x) as [y ?].
+      assumption.
+    Defined.
+
+  End Exercise_1_1.
+
+
+  Section Exercise_1_2.
+
+    (* Use ind_ℕ to define double : ℕ → ℕ which doubles a number. *)
+
+    Definition double : nat -> nat.
+    Proof.
+      apply nat_rect.
+      - exact 0%nat.
+      - intros _ s. exact (s.+2)%nat.
+      (* You should use nat_rect. *)
+    Defined.
+
+    Eval compute in (double 3).
+
+  End Exercise_1_2.
+
+  Section Exercise_1_3.
+
+    (* Define halve : ℕ → ℕ which halves a number (rounded down). *)
+    Definition halve : nat -> nat.
+    Proof.
+    assert (halve_aux : nat -> nat * Bool).
+    - apply nat_rect.
+      + exact (0%nat,true).
+      + intros _ [h b].
+        exact (if b then (h,false) else ((S h),true)).
+    - intros n. exact (fst (halve_aux n)).
+    Defined.
+
+    Eval compute in (halve 17).
+
+  End Exercise_1_3.
+
+End Part_1_Martin_Lof_Type_Theory.
+
+Section Part_2_Identity_Types.
+
+  Section Exercise_2_1.
+
+    (* Construct a path between paths: p · idpath = p. *)
+
+    Theorem Exercise_2_1 (A : Type) (x y : A) (p : x = y) : p @ idpath y = p.
+    Proof.
+      case p. reflexivity.
+    Defined.
+
+  End Exercise_2_1.
+
+  Section Exercise_2_2.
+
+    (* Given a path p : x = y construct p⁻¹ : y = x and show that idpath⁻¹ = idpath. *)
+
+    Definition inv {A : Type} {x y : A} : x = y -> y = x.
+    Proof.
+      intros []. reflexivity.
+    Defined.
+
+    Definition inv_idpath {A : Type} {x : A} : inv (idpath x) = (idpath x).
+    Proof.
+      reflexivity.
+    Defined.
+
+  End Exercise_2_2.
+
+  Section Exercise_2_3.
+
+  Theorem squirrel {A : Type} {B : A -> Type} :
+      forall (x y : A) (p : x = y), forall (u : B x) (v : B y) (q : p # u = v), (x ; u) = (y ; v).
+    Proof.
+      intros x y p.
+      induction p.
+      intros u v q.
+      induction q.
+      reflexivity.
+    Defined.
+
+    Theorem Exercise_2_3
+              {A : Type} {B : A -> Type}
+              {u v : {x : A & B x}}
+              (p : u.1 = v.1)
+              (q : p # u.2 = v.2)
+              : u = v.
+    Proof.
+    destruct u, v.
+    cbn in *.
+    destruct p.
+    cbn in *.
+    destruct q.
+    reflexivity.
+    Qed.
+
+  End Exercise_2_3.
+
+End Part_2_Identity_Types.
+
+Section Part_3_Homotopy_Levels.
+
+  Section Exercise_3_1.
+
+    (* Construct a point if isContr A → Π (x y : A) . isContr (x = y) *)
+
+    Theorem Exercise_3_1 (A : Type) :
+      Contr A -> forall (x y : A), Contr (x = y).
+    Proof.
+        intros [a c] x y.
+        exists ((c x)^@(c y)).
+        intros [].
+        case (c x).
+        reflexivity.
+    Defined.
+
+
+  End Exercise_3_1.
+
+  Section Exercise_3_2.
+
+    (* Is contractibility a property or a structure? *)
+
+    (* Please formalize, use "Contr", "IsHProp". *)
+
+    Theorem Exercise_3_2 `{Funext} (A : Type) : IsHProp (Contr A).
+    Proof.
+        apply hprop_allpath.
+        intros [x hx] [y hy].
+        induction (hx y).
+        apply ap.
+        rapply path_contr.
+        rapply contr_forall.
+        apply Exercise_3_1.
+        eexists.
+        exact hx.
+    Defined.
+
+  End Exercise_3_2.
+
+  Section Exercise_3_3.
+
+    (* Π (x : A) . isContr (Σ (y : A) . x = y *)
+
+    (* Please formalize. *)
+
+    Theorem Exercise_3_3 (A : Type) (x : A) : Contr (exists (y : A), x = y).
+    Proof.
+        exists (exist _ x (idpath x)).
+        intros [? []].
+        reflexivity.
+    Defined.
+
+  End Exercise_3_3.
+
+End Part_3_Homotopy_Levels.
+
+Section Part_4_Equivalences.
+
+  Section Exercise_4_1.
+
+    (* (a) If P and Q are propostions then (P → Q) × (Q → P) → P ≃ Q *)
+
+    Variables P Q : hProp.
+
+    Definition cow : (P -> Q) * (Q -> P) -> P <~> Q.
+    Proof.
+        cbn in *.
+        intros [f g].
+        exists f.
+        apply isequiv_biinv.
+        split.
+        all: exists g ; intro.
+        - apply P.
+        - apply Q.  
+    Defined.
+
+    (* (b) The map above is an equivalence. *)
+
+    Definition moo `{Funext} : IsEquiv cow.
+    Proof.
+    unshelve eexists.
+    + intros [f e].
+      apply contr_map_isequiv in e.
+      split.
+      1: exact f.
+      intros q.
+      specialize (e q).
+      destruct e as [[]].
+      eassumption.
+    + cbn.
+      intros f.
+      apply path_equiv.
+      reflexivity.
+    + cbn.
+      intros [f g].
+      apply path_prod ; cbn.
+      all: reflexivity.
+    + intros [f g].
+      apply path_ishprop.
+    Defined.
+
+    (* (c) If X and Y are sets then (X ≃ Y) ≃ (X ≅ Y). *)
+
+    (* The library does not seem to have an explicit definition of isIso,
+       so we include it here. *)
+
+    Definition isIso {A B} (f : A -> B) : Type :=
+      { g : B -> A & (f o g == idmap) * (g o f == idmap) }%type.
+
+    Theorem rabbit `{Funext} (X Y : hSet) : (X <~> Y) <~> { f : X -> Y & isIso f }.
+    Proof.
+    srapply equiv_adjointify.
+    - intros [f [g ]].
+      exists f, g.
+      now split.
+    - intros (f&?&[]).
+      exists f.
+      unshelve econstructor.
+      1-3: eassumption.
+      intros. apply Y.
+    - cbn.
+      intros (?&?&[]).
+      now repeat apply ap.
+    - cbn.
+      intros [? []].
+      repeat apply ap.
+      apply path_forall.
+      intro.
+      apply hset_path2.
+    Qed.
+
+  End Exercise_4_1.
+
+  Section Exercise_4_2.
+
+    (* Use equivalence to express the fact that | |₋₁ : A → ∣|A||₋₁ is the
+       universal map from A to proposition. *)
+
+    (* Please formalize as follows:
+
+       Given a map q : A → Q, define a map e such that IsEquiv e expresses
+       the fact that q : A → Q is the propositional truncation of A.
+    *)
+
+  End Exercise_4_2.
+
+End Part_4_Equivalences.
+
+Section Part_5_Univalence.
+
+  Section Exercise_5_1.
+
+    (* Show that the type of true propositions is contractible. *)
+
+    Theorem weasel : Univalence -> Contr { A : hProp & A }.
+    Proof.
+        exists (Unit_hp ; tt).
+        intros [A a].
+        unshelve eapply path_sigma'.
+        -   apply path_iff_hprop.
+            + exact (fun _ => a).
+            + exact (fun _ => tt).
+        - apply A.
+    Defined.
+
+  End Exercise_5_1.
+
+  Section Exercise_5_2.
+
+    (* Show that Σ (A : U) . isSet A is not a set. Hint: (2 ≃ 2) ≃ 2. *)
+
+    Lemma two_equiv_two `{Funext} : (Bool <~> Bool) <~> Bool.
+    Proof.
+    unshelve eapply equiv_adjointify.
+    - intros [f _].
+      exact (f true).
+    - exact (fun b : Bool => if b then (equiv_idmap Bool) else equiv_negb).
+    - intros [] ; reflexivity.
+    - intros [f [g fg gf ?]].
+      apply path_equiv.
+      apply path_forall.
+      intros b.
+      cbn.
+      remember (f true) as ft eqn:eft.
+      destruct ft.
+      + destruct b ; cbn.
+        1: symmetry ; assumption.
+        remember (f false) as ff eqn: eff.
+        destruct ff.
+        2: reflexivity.
+        rewrite <- (gf false), <- (gf true), eft, eff.
+        reflexivity.
+      + destruct b ; cbn.
+        1: symmetry ; assumption.
+        remember (f false) as ff eqn: eff.
+        destruct ff.
+        1: reflexivity.
+        rewrite <- (gf true), <- (gf false), eft, eff.
+        reflexivity.
+    Qed.
+
+    Lemma set_not_set `{ua : Univalence} : IsHSet hSet -> Empty.
+    Proof.
+    intros H.
+    unshelve refine (let B : hSet := _ in _ ).
+    1:{ exists Bool. apply hset_bool. }
+    assert (Contr (B = B)).
+    1:{
+      unshelve econstructor.
+      1: exact idpath.
+      intros y.
+      apply hset_path2.
+    }
+    assert (Contr (Bool = Bool)).
+    {
+      eapply contr_equiv'.
+      2: eassumption.
+      symmetry.
+      eapply equiv_path_trunctype'.
+    }
+    assert (Contr (Bool)) as [b eb].
+    1:{ eapply contr_equiv'.
+        2: eassumption.
+        etransitivity.
+        2: apply two_equiv_two.
+        etransitivity.
+        2: exact (equiv_equiv_path Bool Bool).
+        reflexivity.
+    }
+    destruct b ; [specialize (eb false) | specialize (eb true)].
+    all: inversion eb.
+    Qed.
+
+  End Exercise_5_2.
+
+End Part_5_Univalence.