-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seo improve #1128
Merged
Merged
Seo improve #1128
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2. The canonical URL for pagination is the same as the page URL.
Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to a Personal Account owned by @HEIGE-PCloud on Vercel. @HEIGE-PCloud first needs to authorize it. |
wu0407
force-pushed
the
seo-improve
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 19, 2023 13:39
479ab97
to
1b99f14
Compare
2. Add alternateName field to webSite schema. That is an alternate site name used in Google search results. 3. Fix missing field in google rich result test. 4. Prioritize using the featured image in front matter as the article image in JSON-LD.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
@HEIGE-PCloud Is it possible to implement this improvement? Thanks! |
HEIGE-PCloud
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
Thank you very much! |
hodory
pushed a commit
to hodory/DoIt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
* 1. Display page count for paginated titles 2. The canonical URL for pagination is the same as the page URL. * 1. Removed microdata and unified use of JSON-LD. 2. Add alternateName field to webSite schema. That is an alternate site name used in Google search results. 3. Fix missing field in google rich result test. 4. Prioritize using the featured image in front matter as the article image in JSON-LD. --------- Co-authored-by: HEIGE-PCloud <[email protected]>
Jatin794
pushed a commit
to Jatin794/bog
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
* 1. Display page count for paginated titles 2. The canonical URL for pagination is the same as the page URL. * 1. Removed microdata and unified use of JSON-LD. 2. Add alternateName field to webSite schema. That is an alternate site name used in Google search results. 3. Fix missing field in google rich result test. 4. Prioritize using the featured image in front matter as the article image in JSON-LD. --------- Co-authored-by: HEIGE-PCloud <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current structured data for the homepage and post are missing some fields in the Google Rich test.
You can see the test result for https://hugodoit.pages.dev/ at google test result for home page.
For the post page at google test result for article.
This test result is after applying these fixes:
google test result for home page and google test result for article
The title and canonical URL are identical on paginated pages. gohugoio/hugo#4507.
so I do this:
But the
og:url
for pagination is not fixed. I think is not worthwhile to leave it to the Hugo community to resolve.