Feat/user sitemap list #1887
Feat/user sitemap list #1887
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new class, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/entities/user.ts (1)
267-280: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The
UserPublicDataclass is well-structured and appropriately exposes only non-sensitive user information. The fields are correctly marked as optional and nullable.Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose of this class and its relationship with the main
Userentity:+/** + * Represents the publicly accessible user data for the sitemap. + * This is a subset of the main User entity containing only non-sensitive information. + */ @ObjectType() export class UserPublicData extends BaseEntity {src/resolvers/userResolver.ts (1)
47-54: Consider a more specific class name.The class structure is good for pagination, but the name could be more specific about its purpose.
Consider renaming to better reflect its use in the sitemap:
-class AllUsersPublicData { +class UserSitemapPaginatedResponse {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/entities/user.ts(1 hunks)src/resolvers/userResolver.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/resolvers/userResolver.ts (1)
436-459: Verify performance impact on production dataset.
The query fetches user data for the sitemap. Let's verify the potential impact on performance.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to gather information about the database schema and similar query patterns.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Query implementation follows established patterns and includes proper pagination
The implementation follows the same pagination pattern used throughout the codebase, particularly in projectRepository.ts and instantBoostingRepository.ts. The query:
- Selects only necessary fields (firstName, lastName, name, walletAddress)
- Uses standard TypeORM pagination with
skip()andtake() - Has a reasonable default limit of 50 records
- Matches similar implementations in other repositories that handle user data
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the total number of users to understand the scale
echo "Checking total number of users..."
rg -A 1 "SELECT.*FROM.*user.*COUNT" --glob "*.sql"
# Check if there are any existing indexes that could be used
echo "Checking existing indexes..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*user" --glob "*.sql"
# Look for similar pagination patterns in the codebase
echo "Checking similar pagination patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'createQueryBuilder($x)
.skip($_)
.take($_)'
Length of output: 700
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for database migration files
echo "Checking for migration files..."
fd -e ts -e js migration
# Look for similar queries in resolver files
echo "Checking resolver patterns..."
rg -A 5 "createQueryBuilder\('user'\)" --type ts
# Check if there are any performance-related configurations
echo "Checking for TypeORM configurations..."
fd -e ts -e js "ormconfig"
# Look for other paginated queries
echo "Looking for other paginated queries..."
rg "take\(.*limit" --type ts
Length of output: 3639
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/resolvers/userResolver.test.ts (1)
1175-1252: Consider adding more test cases for edge cases and error scenarios.While the current test suite covers the basic functionality well, consider adding the following test cases to improve coverage:
- Invalid inputs (negative skip/limit)
- Empty database scenario
- Result ordering verification
- Maximum limit validation
- Invalid parameter types
function allUsersBasicData() { describe('allUsersBasicData Test Cases', () => { + it('should handle empty database gracefully', async () => { + // Clear users table first + const result = await axios.post(graphqlUrl, { + query: allUsersBasicDataQuery, + }); + const { users, totalCount } = result.data.data.allUsersBasicData; + assert.isArray(users); + assert.equal(users.length, 0); + assert.equal(totalCount, 0); + }); + + it('should validate negative skip/limit parameters', async () => { + const result = await axios.post(graphqlUrl, { + query: allUsersBasicDataQuery, + variables: { skip: -1, limit: -5 }, + }); + assert.exists(result.data.errors); + }); + // Existing test cases... }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/resolvers/userResolver.test.ts(3 hunks)test/graphqlQueries.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/resolvers/userResolver.test.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM!
The import and test suite registration follow the established pattern in the codebase.
Also applies to: 38-38
test/graphqlQueries.ts (1)
2613-2626: LGTM! Well-structured GraphQL query.
The query is well-designed with:
- Proper pagination support
- Only non-sensitive user fields
- Clear field naming
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
UserPublicDataclass for streamlined user data representation in GraphQL.AllUsersPublicDatatype andallUsersBasicDataquery for retrieving paginated user data.allUsersBasicDataQueryfor fetching basic user data with pagination support.Bug Fixes
Documentation