-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Create the original code address and question
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
15 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
https://github.com/irfanICMLL/structure_knowledge_distillation | ||
|
||
Q1: when the batch size is smaller (such as 8 or 4), the performance is drop a lot. so the author discover a new kind of distillation loss, which is more useful. | ||
A1:https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13256. Channel-wise Distillation for Semantic Segmentation | ||
|
||
Q2: Table 2 shows it performs best when beta=2x2. | ||
But in run_train_val.sh, pool-scale is 0.5, thus finally in CriterionPairWiseforWholeFeatAfterPool, the patch size is half of the original feature map size, not 2x2. | ||
A2: this question is not be answered. | ||
|
||
Q3: why structure knowledge distillation is effective and how it can be used for regression tasks? How to choose the intermediate feature maps for pair-wise distillation? | ||
A3: it considers the correlation among pixel. If the unary part is hard to learn or can not be trained effectively, employing the structure KD will help training. I tend to choose some deeper features. Because abstract semantics makes sense. | ||
Besides, the spatial size is smaller which is more efficient. | ||
|
||
Q4: paper use average pooling not max pooling. | ||
A4: max pooling can achieve better performance. |