Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jenkin test pull request #2

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: amd-vulkan-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JacobHeAMD
Copy link

No description provided.

@amdvlk-admin
Copy link

Test summary for commit 86a756d

Driver commits used in build
  • LLPC: dev f36099d4c778327f22b050432f09e17dc815474a
  • PAL: dev f924a4fb84efde321f7754031f8cfa5ab35055d3
  • SPVGEN: dev 328a0990a958f21eb2c6b1ecb092a43629fe5554
  • XGL: dev bca286c1146f9f0662bbb7c10d193e487579e6f0
ShaderDB test
  • Passed: 803/803 (100.0%)
  • Failed: 0/803 (0.0%)
CTS tests (built with branch Vulkan-CTS-1.1.1.2-cherry-picks)
    Ubuntu 18.04, Ellesmere
    • Passed: 312668/312668 (100.0%)
    • Failed: 0/312668 (0.0%)

JacobHeAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2019
Summary:
Scanning blocks in sub-loops for uses is unnecessary, as they were
already handled while dealing with the containing sub-loop.

This speeds up LCSSA for highly nested loops. For the test case in PR37202, it
halves the time spent in LCSSA. In cases were we won't be able to skip
any blocks, the additional lookup should be negligible.

Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:

  Total Execution Time: 48.5505 seconds (48.5511 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
  10.0822 ( 21.0%)   0.1406 ( 27.0%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
  10.0417 ( 20.9%)   0.1467 ( 28.2%)  10.1884 ( 21.0%)  10.1890 ( 21.0%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   4.2703 (  8.9%)   0.0040 (  0.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)  Unswitch loops
   2.7376 (  5.7%)   0.0229 (  4.4%)   2.7605 (  5.7%)   2.7611 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#5
   2.7332 (  5.7%)   0.0214 (  4.1%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#3
   2.7088 (  5.6%)   0.0230 (  4.4%)   2.7319 (  5.6%)   2.7324 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#4
   2.6855 (  5.6%)   0.0236 (  4.5%)   2.7091 (  5.6%)   2.7090 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#6
   2.1648 (  4.5%)   0.0018 (  0.4%)   2.1666 (  4.5%)   2.1664 (  4.5%)  Unroll loops
   1.8371 (  3.8%)   0.0009 (  0.2%)   1.8379 (  3.8%)   1.8380 (  3.8%)  Value Propagation
   1.8149 (  3.8%)   0.0021 (  0.4%)   1.8170 (  3.7%)   1.8169 (  3.7%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   1.6755 (  3.5%)   0.0226 (  4.3%)   1.6981 (  3.5%)   1.6980 (  3.5%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#7

Time-passes with this patch

  Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
   5.2786 ( 17.7%)   0.0021 (  1.2%)   5.2806 ( 17.6%)   5.2808 ( 17.6%)  Unswitch loops
   4.3739 ( 14.7%)   0.0303 ( 18.1%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
   4.2658 ( 14.3%)   0.0192 ( 11.5%)   4.2850 ( 14.3%)   4.2851 ( 14.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   2.2307 (  7.5%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   2.2320 (  7.5%)   2.2318 (  7.5%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   2.0888 (  7.0%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   2.0900 (  7.0%)   2.0897 (  7.0%)  Unroll loops
   1.6761 (  5.6%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)  Value Propagation
   1.3686 (  4.6%)   0.0029 (  1.8%)   1.3716 (  4.6%)   1.3714 (  4.6%)  Induction Variable Simplification
   1.1457 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#4
   1.1384 (  3.8%)   0.0005 (  0.3%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#6
   1.1360 (  3.8%)   0.0027 (  1.6%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#5
   1.1331 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1341 (  3.8%)   1.1340 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass ROCm#3

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: davide, efriedma

Subscribers: hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56848

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JacobHeAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2019
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
    #2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
    ROCm#3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    ROCm#4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    ROCm#5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    ROCm#6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    ROCm#7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    ROCm#8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    ROCm#9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    ROCm#10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    ROCm#11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    ROCm#12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    ROCm#13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
    #2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
    ROCm#3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
    ROCm#4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    ROCm#5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    ROCm#6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    ROCm#7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    ROCm#8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    ROCm#9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    ROCm#10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    ROCm#11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    ROCm#12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    ROCm#13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    ROCm#14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
    #1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
    #2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
    ROCm#3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
    ROCm#4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
    ROCm#5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
    ROCm#6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    ROCm#7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    ROCm#8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    ROCm#9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    ROCm#10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    ROCm#11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    ROCm#12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    ROCm#13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    ROCm#14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    ROCm#15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    ROCm#16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)

SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JacobHeAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2019
Currently, the type id for a derived type is computed incorrectly.
For example,
  type #1: int
  type #2: ptr to #1

For a global variable "int *a", type #1 will be attributed to variable "a".
This is due to a bug which assigns the type id of the basetype of
that derived type as the derived type's type id. This happens
to "const", "volatile", "restrict", "typedef" and "pointer" types.

This patch fixed this bug, fixed existing test cases and added
a new one focusing on pointers plus other derived types.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JacobHeAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2019
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to
unblock buildbot.

==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8
READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0
    #0 0x436434f in
llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet,
8u> const&) const
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11
    #1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule()
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3
    #2 0x434042d in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7
    ROCm#3 0x433eb90 in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5
    ROCm#4 0x428b7ea in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
    ROCm#5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
    ROCm#6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
    ROCm#7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27
    ROCm#8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865
    ROCm#9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8
    ROCm#10 0xa4270f in main
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22
    ROCm#11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    ROCm#12 0x971b69 in _start
(/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JaxLinAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2019
Summary:
Change the scan algorithm to use only power-of-two shifts (1, 2, 4, 8,
16, 32) instead of starting off shifting by 1, 2 and 3 and then doing
a 3-way ADD, because:

1. It simplifies the compiler a little.
2. It minimizes vgpr pressure because each instruction is now of the
   form vn = vn + vn << c.
3. It is more friendly to the DPP combiner, which currently can't
   combine into an ADD3 instruction.

Because of #2 and ROCm#3 the end result is improved from this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v4, v3, v3  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  v_mov_b32_dpp v5, v3  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_mov_b32_dpp v1, v3  row_shr:3 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_add3_u32 v1, v4, v5, v1
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

To this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

I.e. two fewer computational instructions, one extra nop where we could
schedule something else.

Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec, vpykhtin

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64411

Change-Id: I79f792d30210974acbd67ae0c5eaff3094263281
JaxLinAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2019
Summary:
Change the scan algorithm to use only power-of-two shifts (1, 2, 4, 8,
16, 32) instead of starting off shifting by 1, 2 and 3 and then doing
a 3-way ADD, because:

1. It simplifies the compiler a little.
2. It minimizes vgpr pressure because each instruction is now of the
   form vn = vn + vn << c.
3. It is more friendly to the DPP combiner, which currently can't
   combine into an ADD3 instruction.

Because of #2 and ROCm#3 the end result is improved from this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v4, v3, v3  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  v_mov_b32_dpp v5, v3  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_mov_b32_dpp v1, v3  row_shr:3 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_add3_u32 v1, v4, v5, v1
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

To this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

I.e. two fewer computational instructions, one extra nop where we could
schedule something else.

Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec, vpykhtin

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64411

Change-Id: I79f792d30210974acbd67ae0c5eaff3094263281
JaxLinAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2019
Summary:
Change the scan algorithm to use only power-of-two shifts (1, 2, 4, 8,
16, 32) instead of starting off shifting by 1, 2 and 3 and then doing
a 3-way ADD, because:

1. It simplifies the compiler a little.
2. It minimizes vgpr pressure because each instruction is now of the
   form vn = vn + vn << c.
3. It is more friendly to the DPP combiner, which currently can't
   combine into an ADD3 instruction.

Because of #2 and ROCm#3 the end result is improved from this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v4, v3, v3  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  v_mov_b32_dpp v5, v3  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_mov_b32_dpp v1, v3  row_shr:3 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf
  v_add3_u32 v1, v4, v5, v1
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

To this:

  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:1 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:2 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xf bound_ctrl:0
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:4 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xe
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_shr:8 row_mask:0xf bank_mask:0xc
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:15 row_mask:0xa bank_mask:0xf
  s_nop 1
  v_add_u32_dpp v1, v1, v1  row_bcast:31 row_mask:0xc bank_mask:0xf

I.e. two fewer computational instructions, one extra nop where we could
schedule something else.

Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec, vpykhtin

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64411

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JaxLinAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2019
Summary:
Every time PrettyPrinter::printInst is called, stdout is flushed and it makes llvm-objdump slow. This patches adds a string
buffer to prevent stdout from being flushed.

Benchmark results (./llvm-objdump-master: without this patch,  ./bin/llvm-objcopy: with this patch):

  $ hyperfine --warmup 10 './llvm-objdump-master -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy' './bin/llvm-objdump -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy'
  Benchmark #1: ./llvm-objdump-master -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy
    Time (mean ± σ):      2.230 s ±  0.050 s    [User: 1.533 s, System: 0.682 s]
    Range (min … max):    2.115 s …  2.278 s    10 runs

  Benchmark #2: ./bin/llvm-objdump -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy
    Time (mean ± σ):     386.4 ms ±  13.0 ms    [User: 376.6 ms, System: 6.1 ms]
    Range (min … max):   366.1 ms … 407.0 ms    10 runs

  Summary
    './bin/llvm-objdump -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy' ran
      5.77 ± 0.23 times faster than './llvm-objdump-master -d ./bin/llvm-objcopy'

Reviewers: alexshap, Bigcheese, jhenderson, rupprecht, grimar, MaskRay

Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay

Subscribers: dexonsmith, jhenderson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, rupprecht, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64969

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366984 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JaxLinAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2019
…ymbol that belongs to a section with a broken sh_name"

It broke BB:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/16955/steps/test/logs/stdio

Expected<T> must be checked before access or destruction.
Unchecked Expected<T> contained error:
a section [index 1] has an invalid sh_name (0xffff) offset which goes past the end of the section name string tableStack dump:
0.	Program arguments: /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/test/tools/llvm-nm/Output/format-sysv-section.test.tmp2.o --format=sysv 
 #0 0x00000000008af7c4 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8af7c4)
 #1 0x00000000008ad8be llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8ad8be)
 #2 0x00000000008afbd8 SignalHandler(int) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8afbd8)
 ROCm#3 0x00007f0a6b989730 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12730)
 ROCm#4 0x00007f0a6b48d7bb raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x377bb)
 ROCm#5 0x00007f0a6b478535 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22535)
 ROCm#6 0x000000000042004b llvm::Expected<llvm::StringRef>::fatalUncheckedExpected() const (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x42004b)
 ROCm#7 0x00000000008367f5 (/sv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8367f5)
 ROCm#8 0x0000000000817b80 llvm::object::IRObjectFile::findBitcodeInObject(llvm::object::ObjectFile const&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x817b80)
 ROCm#9 0x0000000000838416 llvm::object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::file_magic, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x838416)
ROCm#10 0x00000000007f36cb llvm::object::createBinary(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x7f36cb)
ROCm#11 0x0000000000413123 dumpSymbolNamesFromFile(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x413123)
ROCm#12 0x0000000000412e38 main (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x412e38)
ROCm#13 0x00007f0a6b47a09b __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409b)
ROCm#14 0x00000000004120da _start (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x4120da)
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line:  /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/FileCheck /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-nm/format-sysv-section.test --check-prefix=ERR

--

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@370662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
trenouf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2019
…ymbol that belongs to a section with a broken sh_name"

It broke BB:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/16955/steps/test/logs/stdio

Expected<T> must be checked before access or destruction.
Unchecked Expected<T> contained error:
a section [index 1] has an invalid sh_name (0xffff) offset which goes past the end of the section name string tableStack dump:
0.	Program arguments: /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/test/tools/llvm-nm/Output/format-sysv-section.test.tmp2.o --format=sysv 
 #0 0x00000000008af7c4 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8af7c4)
 #1 0x00000000008ad8be llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8ad8be)
 #2 0x00000000008afbd8 SignalHandler(int) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8afbd8)
 ROCm#3 0x00007f0a6b989730 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12730)
 ROCm#4 0x00007f0a6b48d7bb raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x377bb)
 ROCm#5 0x00007f0a6b478535 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22535)
 ROCm#6 0x000000000042004b llvm::Expected<llvm::StringRef>::fatalUncheckedExpected() const (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x42004b)
 ROCm#7 0x00000000008367f5 (/sv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x8367f5)
 ROCm#8 0x0000000000817b80 llvm::object::IRObjectFile::findBitcodeInObject(llvm::object::ObjectFile const&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x817b80)
 ROCm#9 0x0000000000838416 llvm::object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::file_magic, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x838416)
ROCm#10 0x00000000007f36cb llvm::object::createBinary(llvm::MemoryBufferRef, llvm::LLVMContext*) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x7f36cb)
ROCm#11 0x0000000000413123 dumpSymbolNamesFromFile(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&) (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x413123)
ROCm#12 0x0000000000412e38 main (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x412e38)
ROCm#13 0x00007f0a6b47a09b __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409b)
ROCm#14 0x00000000004120da _start (/srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/llvm-nm+0x4120da)
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line:  /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.obj/bin/FileCheck /srv/llvm-buildbot-srcatch/llvm-build-dir/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-nm/format-sysv-section.test --check-prefix=ERR

--

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@370662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JaxLinAMD pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2019
Summary:
This reverts commit r372204.

This change causes build bot failures under msan:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/35236/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio:

```
FAIL: LLVM :: DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir (19531 of 33579)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc -O0 -start-before=livedebugvalues -filetype=obj -o - /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llvm-dwarfdump -v - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
--
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stderr):
--
==62894==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0xdfcafb in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, bool, unsigned int&, bool, bool) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1658:3
    #1 0xdfae8a in resolveFrameIndexReference /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1580:10
    #2 0xdfae8a in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, unsigned int&) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1536
    ROCm#3 0x46642c1 in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::extractSpillBaseRegAndOffset(llvm::MachineInstr const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:582:21
    ROCm#4 0x4647cb3 in transferSpillOrRestoreInst /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:883:11
    ROCm#5 0x4647cb3 in process /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1079
    ROCm#6 0x4647cb3 in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::ExtendRanges(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1361
    ROCm#7 0x463ac0e in (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:1415:18
    ROCm#8 0x4854ef0 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
    ROCm#9 0x53b0b01 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
    ROCm#10 0x53b15f6 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
    ROCm#11 0x53b298d in runOnModule /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1750:27
    ROCm#12 0x53b298d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1863
    ROCm#13 0x905f21 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:601:8
    ROCm#14 0x8fdc4e in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:355:22
    ROCm#15 0x7f67673632e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    ROCm#16 0x882369 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x882369)

MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64FrameLowering.cpp:1658:3 in llvm::AArch64FrameLowering::resolveFrameOffsetReference(llvm::MachineFunction const&, int, bool, unsigned int&, bool, bool) const
Exiting
error: -: The file was not recognized as a valid object file
FileCheck error: '-' is empty.
FileCheck command line:  /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
```

Reviewers: bkramer

Reviewed By: bkramer

Subscribers: sdardis, aprantl, kristof.beyls, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67710

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@372228 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants