-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Use Case Catalog
The following use case-like descriptions are based on responses from the "Specifications Survey" to the question, "what system-to-system integration examples does TAPICC need to cover?"
--- BEGIN ---
-
Exchange project data and payloads between CMS and TMS, and with QMS. Make storage of translation project data easier and more efficient.
-
That ("A CMS system has translatable strings that it needs to send to and retrieve from a TMS system in the form of a translation project.") is pretty much the situation. Not limited to a CMS
-
Hot folders on file system, also perhaps from cloud storage
-
Define a standard package for exchanging localization material.
-
I don't see system to system intgration. I see standalone systems, where the business rules are the bridges between them and any party can write the push pulls for differnet systems.
-
CMS->TMS: send translatable content (XLIFF or native format)
-
TMS->CMS: send translated content back (XLIFF or native)
-
TMS->TMS: send smaller translation packages to translator / send packages back
-
To describe the interaction between CMS and TMS. EG. how to push content from a CMS and ingest into TMS. How to describe source and target locales (possibly this is covered by the metadata group?) How to push translated content back to CMS.
-
CMS to TMS, CMS to CAT Tool, TMS to CAT Tool, Content Tool (MS Office, Adobe CC, ...) to TMS, Content Tool to CAT Tool
-
Option to digitally sign assets sent from CMS<->TMS to ensure integrity of data in transit.
--- END ---