Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example of CoKo rule for Bouncy Castle #844

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024
Merged

Example of CoKo rule for Bouncy Castle #844

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

fwendland
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an initial example, how to use CoKo to model Bouncy Castle.

@fwendland fwendland self-assigned this Apr 10, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.39%. Comparing base (2655ff3) to head (ea51d38).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #844   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     82.39%   82.39%           
  Complexity      179      179           
=========================================
  Files            49       49           
  Lines          1363     1363           
  Branches        184      184           
=========================================
  Hits           1123     1123           
  Misses          157      157           
  Partials         83       83           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.39% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fwendland fwendland merged commit 08de9bd into main Apr 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@fwendland fwendland deleted the coko-examples branch April 15, 2024 09:41
fwendland added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants