-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: upgrade javadoc plugin to 3.11.1 #140
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pom.xml (1)
301-304
: Consider enabling failOnWarnings for better documentation quality.While adding links to Vaadin platform javadoc is excellent, setting
failOnWarnings=false
might allow documentation issues to slip through. Consider enabling it to maintain high documentation standards.- <failOnWarnings>false</failOnWarnings> + <failOnWarnings>true</failOnWarnings>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pom.xml
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pom.xml (2)
292-292
: LGTM! Phase change is appropriate.
Moving javadoc generation from verify
to package
phase is a good optimization as it:
- Provides earlier feedback on javadoc issues
- Better aligns with Maven's standard lifecycle (documentation is part of the package)
288-288
: LGTM! Version upgrade looks good.
The upgrade from 3.1.1 to 3.11.1 is compatible with the project's Java 8 baseline.
✅ Verification successful
Version upgrade to maven-javadoc-plugin 3.11.1 is safe to proceed
The search confirms that there is only one instance of maven-javadoc-plugin in the project's build configuration, and the version upgrade to 3.11.1 is consistently applied. No conflicting versions were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if there are any other javadoc plugin version references
rg "maven-javadoc-plugin.*version" --type xml
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for maven-javadoc-plugin references
rg "maven-javadoc-plugin" --type xml -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 648
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores