Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Stag] Fix: Reports - "Customize your search" tooltip reappears while creating an expense #54897

Conversation

rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah commented Jan 7, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #54879
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open the Expensify app.
  2. Log in with a new account.
  3. Tap on "Reports"
  4. Tap on the FAB and select "Create Expense"
  5. Start the expense creation process.
  6. Check the "Customize your search" tooltip behaviour during the process.
  7. Expected Result: "Customize your search" tooltip, shouldn´t be displayed while creating an expense.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-01-07.at.11.54.58.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-01-07.at.11.46.21.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2025-01-07.at.23.38.47.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2025-01-07.at.23.41.33.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-01-07.at.11.01.59.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-01-07.at.11.33.13.PM.mov

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 19:06
@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 19:06
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from ishpaul777 January 7, 2025 19:06
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 7, 2025

@ishpaul777 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team January 7, 2025 19:06
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

🚧 @puneetlath has triggered a test build. You can view the workflow run here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

rayane-djouah commented Jan 7, 2025

bug: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1736285136997179?thread_ts=1736265399.917209&cid=C01GTK53T8Q

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2025-01-07.at.21.51.57.mp4

fixed in d8171c4

@thienlnam thienlnam requested a review from ikevin127 January 7, 2025 23:00
@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

rayane-djouah commented Jan 7, 2025

@ikevin127, please make sure to test the steps from this PR, in addition to the blocker steps and the steps for this bug.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

ikevin127 commented Jan 7, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-mweb.mp4
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-mweb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests from PR #54710:

Concierge Chat Tooltip ✅
FAB (Floating Action Button) Tooltip ✅
QAB (Quick Action Button) Tooltip ✅
Workspace Chat Tooltip ✅
Filter Button Tooltip ✅
Inbox Icon Tooltip ✅
"+" Button Tooltip in Invited Workspace ✅
For all other tooltips ✅

Saved search tooltip ⚠️ (only showing the tooltip on large layout devices LNH, not showing in narrow layout devices)

Wide Narrow
wide narrow

I've been told that this is expected though.

This issue is also not reproducible anymore on this PR (fixed).

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia January 8, 2025 00:09
@thienlnam thienlnam changed the title Fix: Reports - "Customize your search" tooltip reappears while creating an expense [CP Stag] Fix: Reports - "Customize your search" tooltip reappears while creating an expense Jan 8, 2025
@thienlnam thienlnam requested review from thienlnam and removed request for grgia January 8, 2025 00:13
@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Taking over review as this is a deploy blocker and urgent

@Expensify Expensify deleted a comment from ishpaul777 Jan 8, 2025
@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Had to delete Ishpaul's checklist since the PR Reviewer checklist won't work if the first one is incomplete

@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit 56444a5 into Expensify:main Jan 8, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah deleted the fix-tooltip-reappears-while-creating-an-expense branch January 8, 2025 00:17
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 8, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
…ile-creating-an-expense

[CP Stag] Fix: Reports - "Customize your search" tooltip reappears while creating an expense

(cherry picked from commit 56444a5)

(CP triggered by thienlnam)
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.81-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.0.81-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging Ready To Build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants