feat: support new PyIceberg IO properties and custom IOConfig in write_iceberg

[kevinzwang]

In addition to the new features, I restructured our _convert_iceberg_file_io_properties_to_io_config in two ways:

1. we no longer import the property key constants from PyIceberg and instead hard-code them ourselves. this is because many of the keys only exist depending on the PyIceberg version being used, so we would need to add a multitude of version checks to cover all the possible keys.
2. we now directly construct the configs using a new get_first_property_value function, instead creating a dictionary to pass into the constructors. This allows us to better take advantage of the type system and enables type checkers to catch potential issues. Also this function allows us to have multiple properties that can be used for a config value

I also cleaned up read_iceberg just a little bit to make the names and types more similar to write_iceberg

[kevinzwang]

Resolves #3627

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.25000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.99%. Comparing base (1c0f780) to head (bb97524).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
daft/io/_iceberg.py	70.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3633      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.90%   77.99%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         720      720              
  Lines       88724    88794      +70     
==========================================
+ Hits        69117    69252     +135     
+ Misses      19607    19542      -65     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
daft/dataframe/dataframe.py	85.34% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
daft/logical/builder.py	89.57% <100.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
daft/io/_iceberg.py	90.00% <70.00%> (+4.28%)	⬆️

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

[jaychia]

LGTM with comments

[jaychia]

Rm

[jaychia]

Should these (including the GCS ones below) also use get_first_property_value since we also want it to affect any_props_set?

[kevinzwang]

Ah good point, will change that

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3633 will improve performances by 98.6%

_{Comparing kevin/pyiceberg-new-props (bb97524) with main (1a4ae66)}

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
✅ 26 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	kevin/pyiceberg-new-props	Change
⚡	test_show[100 Small Files]	30.4 ms	15.3 ms	+98.6%