Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] Partitioning exprs for Iceberg #1680

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

samster25
Copy link
Member

@samster25 samster25 commented Nov 29, 2023

Implements the following partitioning expressions that return the number of units since epoch time UTC.

  • partitioning_days
  • partitioning_hours
  • partitioning_months
  • partitioning_years

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 29, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1680 (af14473) into main (7d7938f) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1680      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.00%   84.98%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        5329     5341      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         4530     4539       +9     
- Misses        799      802       +3     
Files Coverage Δ
daft/series.py 92.62% <100.00%> (+0.23%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@samster25 samster25 changed the title [FEAT] Partitioning exprs [FEAT] Partitioning exprs for Iceberg Nov 29, 2023
@samster25 samster25 merged commit 822b562 into main Nov 29, 2023
42 checks passed
@samster25 samster25 deleted the sammy/partitioning-exprs branch November 29, 2023 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant