-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updating the client to fix stuff #31
base: mr-scrooge-3.0.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review skippedMore than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review. 83 files out of 165 files are above the max files limit of 75. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits. You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a series of changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the API structure, updating workflow configurations, and introducing new components for user management and session handling. Key modifications include the addition of environment variables and package manager specifications, restructuring of API endpoints, and the introduction of new React components for admin functionalities. There are also updates to error handling and logging mechanisms, alongside the removal of obsolete files, streamlining the overall codebase. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
ca45fc6
to
ea7f869
Compare
13b16cf
to
cd139b3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
src/react-view/utils/session/session-context.tsx (3)
Line range hint
38-50
: UsesessionInfo
instead ofsession.result.data
inuserGroups
calculationThe
userGroups
computation is still referencingsession.result.data
instead of the updated state variablesessionInfo
. This may lead to inconsistencies or errors sincesessionInfo
holds the current session data.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const userGroups = useMemo(() => { const rest = new Map<ApiUUID, UserGroup>() - if (session.result){ - const userInfo = session.result.data + if (sessionInfo){ + const userInfo = sessionInfo if (userInfo?.user == "identified"){ userInfo.profile.groups.forEach(group => { rest.set(group.id, group) }) } } return rest -}, [session]); +}, [sessionInfo]);
75-75
: Remove inappropriate language from logging messageThe log message contains unprofessional language:
"What the fuck!"
. Please replace it with a more appropriate message to maintain code professionalism.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-logger.info("What the fuck!", session.result) +logger.info("Session information:", session.result)
Line range hint
85-87
: Remove debuggingconsole.log
statement inuseIsAuthenticated
The
console.log(info)
statement is likely left over from debugging and should be removed to prevent unintended logging in production.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
export const useIsAuthenticated = (): boolean => { const info = useContext(SessionContext); - console.log(info) return info.session.user !== 'anonymous'; };
src/react-view/contents/admin/users/user-switcher.tsx (1)
15-15
: Remove debuggingconsole.log
statementThe
console.log(id, users)
statement appears to be for debugging purposes and should be removed to prevent unintended logging in production.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const userDetails = users.find(user => user.id === id) -console.log(id, users) return userDetails ? <EditUser user={userDetails} /> : <NotFound />
src/react-view/contents/admin/admin-content.tsx (1)
8-17
: Consider enhancing error handling and authorization logic.The current implementation could benefit from some improvements:
- Add error boundaries to handle potential throws from
useUserProfileOrThrows
- Consider extracting the admin check into a custom hook (e.g.,
useRequireAdmin
)- Add loading state handling
Here's a suggested implementation:
export const useRequireAdmin = () => { const user = useUserProfileOrThrows(); if (!user.isAdmin) { throw new Error('Admin access required'); } return user; }; export const AdminContent: React.FC = () => { const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); try { useRequireAdmin(); useEffect(() => { setIsLoading(false); }, []); if (isLoading) { return <LoadingSpinner />; } return ( <Routes> <Route path="users/*" element={<AdminUsers />}/> <Route path="*" element={<NotFound />}/> </Routes> ); } catch (error) { return <NotFound />; } };src/react-view/contents/admin/users/user-edit.tsx (1)
1-6
: Fix import sorting as flagged by linter.Reorder imports:
import React from 'react'; import { Box, Form, Heading } from 'grommet'; import { UserProfile } from '../../../api/models'; import { useLogger } from '../../../utils/logger/logger.context'; import { UserForm } from './user-form';🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint
[failure] 1-1:
Run autofix to sort these imports!src/react-view/contents/admin/users/users-list.tsx (1)
16-16
: Fix style prop spacing.There's a missing space after
id}
.- <AnchorLink to={user.id}style={{ overflow: 'hidden', textOverflow: 'ellipsis' }}> + <AnchorLink to={user.id} style={{ overflow: 'hidden', textOverflow: 'ellipsis' }}>src/swift-server/react/react-controller.swift (1)
Line range hint
19-24
: Fix hardcoded debug value.The debug mode is hardcoded to
true
with a TODO comment. This could expose debug information in production environments.Consider implementing this fix:
self.ctx = ReactContext( - debug: true, // Todo: get from app env + debug: app.environment == .development, staticPath: "/", version: buildInfo.appVersion, environment: "development", decimalCount: 2 ).github/workflows/test-view.yml (1)
10-10
: Consider using latest stable pnpm version.The workflow pins pnpm to version 9.12.0. Consider upgrading to the latest stable version for security updates and performance improvements.
src/react-view/contents/graphs/graphs.tsx (1)
Line range hint
33-34
: Enhance error state UI and add retry mechanismThe error state could be more user-friendly and include a retry option.
- return <div>Error loading the graphs </div> + return ( + <Box pad="medium" align="center" gap="medium"> + <Text color="status-error">Failed to load graphs. Please try again.</Text> + <Button + label="Retry" + onClick={() => graphs.reset()} + primary + /> + </Box> + );src/react-view/contents/graphs/graph-with-rechart/graph.tsx (2)
Line range hint
24-27
: Consider using type-safe API route constructionThe string template
/graphs/{id}
could be replaced with a type-safe route construction to prevent potential runtime errors.Consider using a constant or enum for API routes:
const API_ROUTES = { deleteGraph: (id: ApiUUID) => `/graphs/${id}` as const } as const;
Line range hint
41-47
: Enhance user feedback for delete operationThe delete operation should provide visual feedback during the process and after completion/failure.
Consider these improvements:
<ConfirmationButton color="accent-4" icon={<Trash />} + disabled={deleteCb.loading} onConfirm={() => { deleteCb.execute(graph.id).then(() => { + logger.info("Graph deleted successfully"); reload(); }, (error: unknown) => { - logger.error("Error deleting graph", error) + logger.error("Error deleting graph", error); + // Show error message to user + // You can use your preferred notification system here }); }} />src/react-view/contents/admin/users/admin-user.tsx (2)
17-25
: Enhance error handling and loading statesThe pagination error handling could be more specific and loading states should be handled.
Consider these improvements:
const paginationUsers = usePagination(async next => { + try { const { data } = await client.GET("/users", {params: {query: {cursor: next}}}) if (data){ return data } else { - logger.error("Request didn't get data") - throw Error("Get users didn't had any data") + const error = new Error("Failed to fetch users: Empty response"); + logger.error(error.message); + throw error; } + } catch (error) { + logger.error("Failed to fetch users", error); + throw error; + } })
42-42
: Add loading and error states to UsersListThe UsersList component should handle loading and error states from pagination.
-<UsersList users={users} /> +<UsersList + users={users} + loading={paginationUsers.loading} + error={paginationUsers.error} +/>src/react-view/contents/common/uploader-queue.context.tsx (2)
41-41
: Consider using type guard instead of type assertionThe type assertion
as IFileData
could mask potential type mismatches. Consider using a type guard to ensure type safety.-oldFiles[pos] = { ...oldFiles[pos], ...changeFile } as IFileData; +const updatedFile = { ...oldFiles[pos], ...changeFile }; +if (isFileData(updatedFile)) { + oldFiles[pos] = updatedFile; +} else { + console.error('Invalid file data structure', updatedFile); +}
Line range hint
49-60
: Add concurrency control to file uploadsThe current implementation starts all file uploads simultaneously, which could overwhelm the server or browser. Consider implementing a concurrency limit.
const submit = async () => { setUploading(true); + const MAX_CONCURRENT_UPLOADS = 3; + const chunks = []; + for (let i = 0; i < files.length; i += MAX_CONCURRENT_UPLOADS) { + chunks.push(files.slice(i, i + MAX_CONCURRENT_UPLOADS)); + } - for (const fileData of files) { + for (const chunk of chunks) { + await Promise.all(chunk.map(async (fileData) => { change(fileData.id, { status: FileStatus.uploading }); const response = await sendFile.execute(fileData.kind, fileData.file); if (response.status === 200) { change(fileData.id, { status: FileStatus.upload }); eventEmitter.emit(EventTypes.OnFileUploaded); } else { change(fileData.id, { status: FileStatus.error }); } + })); } setUploading(false); eventEmitter.emit(EventTypes.OnQueueUploadFinish); }src/react-view/contents/profile/edit-profile.tsx (1)
39-52
: Consider using try-catch with async/awaitWhile the current promise chain works, using try-catch with async/await would be more consistent with modern JavaScript practices and easier to read.
- updateProfile.execute( - data, - ).then(()=>{ - setUiProfile({ - ...uiProfile, - password: '', - newPassword: '', - newPassword2: '', - }); - refresh(); - }).catch((error:unknown)=> { - logger.error("Error updating the user info", { error }) - }) + try { + await updateProfile.execute(data); + setUiProfile({ + ...uiProfile, + password: '', + newPassword: '', + newPassword2: '', + }); + refresh(); + } catch (error) { + logger.error("Error updating the user info", { error }); + }src/react-view/api/generated-models.ts (6)
272-287
: Consider consolidating session updates under a single endpointThe
"/session/me"
endpoint provides aPUT
method for updating session details. Assess whether this functionality could be integrated into the"/session"
endpoint for consistency.If consolidation is preferred, you might apply this change:
-"/session/me": { +"/session": { parameters: { ... }, put: operations["ApiSession_updateMe"], ... },
288-298
: Add query parameters for user listing in"/users"
endpointThe
GET
method for"/users"
currently lacks parameters for filtering or pagination. To enhance usability, consider adding query parameters likecursor
andlimit
.Update the parameters as follows:
parameters: { - query?: never; + query?: { + cursor?: string; + limit?: number; + }; header?: never; path?: never; cookie?: never; };
501-510
: Provide descriptions forOperation
enum values andRule
schema fieldsTo enhance API documentation clarity, add descriptions to the
Operation
enum values and the fields within theRule
schema.Example:
/** @enum {string} */ -Operation: "greater" | "greaterEqual" | "lower" | "lowerEqual" | "contains" | "prefix" | "regularExpression" | "suffix"; +Operation: + /** Greater than */ + "greater" | + /** Greater than or equal to */ + "greaterEqual" | + /** Less than */ + "lower" | + /** Less than or equal to */ + "lowerEqual" | + /** Contains */ + "contains" | + /** Starts with */ + "prefix" | + /** Matches regular expression */ + "regularExpression" | + /** Ends with */ + "suffix";
555-557
: Add missing field descriptions inUserProfile
schemaTo improve API usability, provide descriptions for the newly added
isActive
anddefaultGroupId
fields in theUserProfile
schema.Example:
UserProfile: { id: components["schemas"]["UUID"]; username: string; email: string; firstName?: string; lastName?: string; isAdmin: boolean; + /** Indicates if the user is active */ isActive: boolean; groups: components["schemas"]["UserGroup"][]; + /** The default group ID for the user */ defaultGroupId: components["schemas"]["UUID"]; };
1109-1128
: Consider adding pagination parameters toApiRule_list
operationThe
ApiRule_list
operation currently does not support pagination. For better scalability, consider addingcursor
andlimit
query parameters.Update the operation parameters:
parameters: { query?: { + cursor?: string; + limit?: number; + }; header?: never; path?: never; cookie?: never; };
Line range hint
1129-1158
: Clarify response types in session-related operationsFor
ApiSession_me
, ensure that the response types (GetMyProfile
andNotIdentified
) are distinctly documented to aid client implementation.Consider adding a discriminator or clear documentation on when each type is returned.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
.github/workflows/test-view.yml
(4 hunks)package.yaml
(1 hunks)src/react-view/api/generated-models.ts
(16 hunks)src/react-view/api/models.ts
(1 hunks)src/react-view/api/openapi-react-query.ts
(0 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/admin-content.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/users/admin-user.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/users/new-user.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/users/user-edit.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/users/user-form.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/users/user-switcher.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/admin/users/users-list.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/common/uploader-queue.context.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/graphs/graph-router.tsx
(0 hunks)src/react-view/contents/graphs/graph-with-rechart/graph.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/graphs/graphs.tsx
(1 hunks)src/react-view/contents/headers.tsx
(4 hunks)src/react-view/contents/main/index.tsx
(0 hunks)src/react-view/contents/main/tags-list.tsx
(0 hunks)src/react-view/contents/profile/edit-profile.tsx
(3 hunks)src/react-view/contents/restricted-content.tsx
(2 hunks)src/react-view/contents/session/login.tsx
(3 hunks)src/react-view/contents/transaction-list/transaction-list.tsx
(4 hunks)src/react-view/utils/promises.ts
(1 hunks)src/react-view/utils/session/session-context.tsx
(3 hunks)src/swift-server/react/react-controller.swift
(1 hunks)src/swift-server/routes.swift
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- src/react-view/contents/graphs/graph-router.tsx
- src/react-view/contents/main/index.tsx
- src/react-view/contents/main/tags-list.tsx
- src/react-view/api/openapi-react-query.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint
src/react-view/contents/admin/users/user-edit.tsx
[failure] 1-1:
Run autofix to sort these imports!
[failure] 13-13:
'logger' is assigned a value but never used
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/swift-server/react/react-controller.swift (1)
32-32
:
Consider removing redundant wildcard route.
This additional wildcard route routes.grouped("*").grouped("*").get("*", use: getReact)
appears redundant as the existing routes already handle all possible paths with:
routes.get(use: getReact)
routes.get("*", use: getReact)
routes.grouped("*").get("*", use: getReact)
Multiple overlapping wildcard routes can lead to:
- Route conflicts
- Unnecessary route matching overhead
- Potential unexpected behavior in route resolution
✅ Verification successful
Remove redundant wildcard route for better route handling
The codebase inspection confirms that there are multiple overlapping wildcard routes all pointing to the same getReact
handler:
routes.get(use: getReact)
- catches root pathroutes.get("*", use: getReact)
- catches all single-level pathsroutes.grouped("*").get("*", use: getReact)
- catches all two-level pathsroutes.grouped("*").grouped("*").get("*", use: getReact)
- catches all three-level paths
The last route is redundant because:
- The previous routes already provide complete coverage for all possible paths
- Adding deeper nesting doesn't provide any additional functionality
- Multiple wildcard patterns increase route resolution complexity
Please remove the line:
routes.grouped("*").grouped("*").get("*", use: getReact)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any route handlers that might require this deep nesting
rg -l "routes\.grouped.*\.grouped.*\.get" --type swift
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the full route configuration in the file
rg "routes\." -A 3 src/swift-server/react/react-controller.swift
Length of output: 237
.github/workflows/test-view.yml (1)
31-31
: Verify test script rename.
The command has changed from pnpm run test:view
to pnpm run test
. Please ensure that:
- The
test:view
script has been properly migrated - All test cases are still being executed
✅ Verification successful
Test script change is valid
The test:view
script no longer exists in package.json, and the test
script is properly configured to run Jest with a specific config file. This indicates that the test scripts have been consolidated, which is a valid change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if test:view script still exists and compare with test script
cat package.json | jq '.scripts | {test, "test:view"}'
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find package.json files and check their content
fd -e json "^package.json$" --exec cat {} | jq '.scripts | {test, "test:view"}'
Length of output: 151
src/react-view/api/models.ts (1)
18-18
: LGTM: Type import from generated schema.
The UpdateMyProfile
type is correctly imported from the generated schema.
src/react-view/contents/graphs/graphs.tsx (1)
15-15
: LGTM: Logger context name update
The addition of a specific context name "Graphs" for the logger is a good practice for better log filtering and debugging.
src/react-view/contents/headers.tsx (2)
17-31
: LGTM! Well-structured admin menu implementation.
The admin section is properly implemented with:
- Correct conditional rendering based on
isAdmin
flag - Clear navigation paths to admin routes
- Consistent icon usage
42-42
: Verify admin routes accessibility
The admin section integration and profile edit functionality look good, but let's verify the routes are properly protected.
Also applies to: 51-51
✅ Verification successful
Admin routes are properly protected
The verification shows that admin routes are adequately protected through multiple layers:
- Server-side middleware (
user.middleware.swift
) enforces admin checks with proper error handling - Client-side protection in
admin-content.tsx
conditionally renders admin routes only for users withisAdmin: true
- The admin section in headers is only rendered when
userInfo.isAdmin
is true - User management endpoints verify admin status before allowing operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for admin route protection in the codebase
echo "Checking admin route protection..."
rg -l "isAdmin|admin.*check|auth.*admin" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for profile route protection
echo "Checking profile route protection..."
rg -l "profile.*route|protected.*profile" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 346
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for admin route protection in the codebase with correct file type
echo "Checking admin route protection..."
rg -l "isAdmin|admin.*check|auth.*admin" --type typescript
# Search for profile route protection
echo "Checking profile route protection..."
rg -l "profile.*route|protected.*profile" --type typescript
# Let's also check for route protection implementation details
echo "Checking route protection implementation..."
rg "isAdmin|auth.*admin|protected.*route" -A 3 --type typescript
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for admin route protection in the codebase without file type restriction
echo "Checking admin route protection..."
rg -l "isAdmin|admin.*check|auth.*admin"
# Search for profile route protection
echo "Checking profile route protection..."
rg -l "profile.*route|protected.*profile"
# Let's also check for route protection implementation details
echo "Checking route protection implementation..."
rg "isAdmin|auth.*admin|protected.*route" -A 3
# Additionally, let's look for router configuration files
echo "Checking router configuration files..."
fd -e ts -e tsx "router|routes"
Length of output: 12099
src/react-view/contents/restricted-content.tsx (1)
59-60
: LGTM! Clean route implementation.
The new routes are well-organized and follow the existing pattern. Good cleanup of commented code.
src/swift-server/routes.swift (1)
26-28
: LGTM! Proper unauthorized error handling.
The NotIdentifiedError case is properly handled with the correct HTTP status code and message.
src/react-view/contents/transaction-list/transaction-list.tsx (2)
20-20
: Verify API endpoint compatibility
The endpoint has changed from /imports/kinds
to /imports/parsers
, and the response structure is being accessed differently.
Also applies to: 52-52
✅ Verification successful
API endpoint change is valid and compatible
The change from /imports/kinds
to /imports/parsers
is a valid endpoint change, and the response structure is properly handled. The OpenAPI specification shows that /imports/parsers
is the correct endpoint that returns a list of file parser types through the ApiImports_parserTypes
operation. The endpoint is being used correctly in both transaction-list.tsx
and import-wizard.tsx
components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of the imports API endpoints
rg "/imports/(kinds|parsers)" --type typescript
# Search for uses of importKinds in the codebase
rg "importKinds" --type typescript
Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of the imports API endpoints without file type restriction
rg "/imports/(kinds|parsers)"
# Search for uses of importKinds
rg "importKinds"
# Look for API client interface or implementation
fd -e ts -e tsx "client\.(ts|tsx)$"
Length of output: 1139
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the client implementation for API interface
cat src/react-view/api/client.tsx
# Check the generated models for response type
cat src/react-view/api/generated-models.ts
Length of output: 44110
13-13
: Verify type compatibility after label type change
The label type has changed from number
to string
, and it's being cast to ApiUUID
. This could lead to runtime errors if the values don't match the expected format.
Also applies to: 31-31
✅ Verification successful
Note: Corrected the file type flags for ripgrep to -t ts -t tsx
for TypeScript files and added more comprehensive searches to understand the usage context.
Note: Removed file type restrictions and simplified the search patterns to get more comprehensive results.
Type change from number to string is safe and consistent with the codebase
The search results show that the label
property in TransactionList
is being used with ApiUUID
type, which is defined in models.ts
as an alias for the OpenAPI-generated UUID type. The type change from number
to string
is actually more appropriate since UUIDs are string-based. Other instances of label: number
in the codebase are unrelated components with different contexts.
The casting to ApiUUID
in transaction-list.tsx
is a type-safe operation as it ensures the string value conforms to the UUID type definition from the API schema.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of the label property to ensure compatibility
rg -l "label.*: number" --type typescript
rg "as ApiUUID" --type typescript
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for label property usage and ApiUUID casting
rg -t ts -t tsx "label.*: number"
rg -t ts -t tsx "as ApiUUID"
# Search for files that might use this component
rg -t ts -t tsx "TransactionList"
# Look for type definitions
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs ast-grep --pattern 'type ApiUUID = $_'
Length of output: 333
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search using more basic patterns without file type restrictions
rg "label.*: number"
rg "as ApiUUID"
rg "TransactionList.*label"
# Check the type definition file for UUID
cat src/react-view/api/models.ts
# Look for component usage
rg "<TransactionList"
Length of output: 3301
src/react-view/contents/profile/edit-profile.tsx (1)
16-19
: LGTM: Proper typing with UpdateMyProfile
The API client implementation with proper typing using UpdateMyProfile is a good practice for type safety.
src/react-view/api/generated-models.ts (11)
253-269
: Review session endpoint methods for completeness and consistency
The "/session"
endpoint now includes GET
, POST
, and DELETE
methods for session management. Ensure these methods align with your authentication strategy and that appropriate authentication middleware is applied.
Confirm that authentication checks are in place for each method where required.
360-366
: Ensure Operation
enum values match expected operations
The Operation
enum defines various comparison operations. Verify that these values match the operations supported by your application logic.
Check the implementations that use this enum to ensure compatibility.
516-524
: Ensure sensitive fields in UpdateMyProfile
are handled securely
The UpdateMyProfile
schema includes fields like newPassword
and password
. Confirm that these fields are encrypted during transmission and that appropriate validation is in place.
[security]
Ensure compliance with security best practices for handling user credentials.
525-534
: Validate fields in UpdateUserData
schema
The UpdateUserData
schema includes fields for updating user information. Ensure that validation rules are enforced, especially for fields like email
and password
.
Implement server-side validation to prevent invalid data from being accepted.
Line range hint 1158-1191
: Ensure authentication flow is secure in ApiSession_login
operation
The ApiSession_login
operation handles user credentials. Verify that secure transmission methods (e.g., HTTPS) are enforced and that credentials are not logged.
[security]
Review authentication mechanisms to comply with best security practices.
1320-1373
: Ensure error responses are appropriately defined in ApiUser_update
operation
The ApiUser_update
operation includes multiple error responses (400, 401, 404). Verify that each response includes meaningful error messages to aid debugging.
Check that the components["schemas"]["Error"]
provides sufficient information.
Line range hint 1373-1404
: Confirm deletion logic in ApiUser_delete
operation
Ensure that deleting a user doesn't inadvertently affect related data (e.g., transactions, sessions). Implement soft-delete if necessary.
Review the cascading effects of user deletion on the system.
Line range hint 1404-1436
: Implement authorization checks in ApiUser_addGroup
operation
Adding a user to a group should be restricted to authorized personnel. Ensure that proper checks are in place to prevent unauthorized modifications.
[security]
Confirm that only admins or group owners can perform this action.
Line range hint 1436-1464
: Review error handling in ApiUser_deleteGroup
operation
Ensure that appropriate error responses are returned when attempting to remove a user from a group they do not belong to or when the group does not exist.
Test edge cases to ensure robust error handling.
595-630
:
Add missing path parameter in ApiBankTransactions_comment
operation
The ApiBankTransactions_comment
operation lacks the definition of the transactionId
path parameter. Include it to ensure correct API usage.
Apply this diff:
parameters: {
query?: never;
header?: never;
path: {
transactionId: components["schemas"]["UUID"];
+ // Add other necessary path parameters if any
};
cookie?: never;
};
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
237-246
: Ensure endpoint change from /profiles
to /rules
is reflected across the codebase
The endpoint has been updated from "/profiles"
to "/rules"
, and the POST
method has been removed. Verify that all references to "/profiles"
are updated accordingly and that any functionality depending on the POST
method is appropriately handled.
Run the following script to find any remaining references to "/profiles"
:
export const EditUser: React.FC<EditUserParams> = ({user})=>{ | ||
const logger = useLogger("EditUser") | ||
return <Box> | ||
<Heading level={2}>Editing user</Heading> | ||
<Form<UserProfile> value={user}> | ||
<UserForm /> | ||
</Form> | ||
</Box> | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add form submission handling and remove unused logger.
The component is missing form submission handling and has an unused logger variable.
Here's a suggested implementation:
export const EditUser: React.FC<EditUserParams> = ({user}) => {
const logger = useLogger("EditUser");
const onSubmit = useCallback(async (values: UserProfile) => {
try {
logger.info('Updating user profile', { userId: user.id });
// TODO: Implement API call to update user
} catch (error) {
logger.error('Failed to update user profile', { error });
// TODO: Handle error state
}
}, [user.id, logger]);
return (
<Box>
<Heading level={2}>Editing user</Heading>
<Form<UserProfile>
value={user}
onSubmit={({value}) => onSubmit(value)}
>
<UserForm />
</Form>
</Box>
);
};
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint
[failure] 13-13:
'logger' is assigned a value but never used
export const UsersList : React.FC<UsersListParams> = ({users}) => { | ||
return <> | ||
{users.map(user => <Box pad="small" key={user.id} direction="row" align="center"> | ||
{user.isAdmin ? <UserAdmin /> : <User />} | ||
<AnchorLink to={user.id}style={{ overflow: 'hidden', textOverflow: 'ellipsis' }}> | ||
{user.username} | ||
</AnchorLink> | ||
</Box>)} | ||
</> | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance component with empty state and accessibility improvements.
The component needs handling for empty states and better accessibility.
Here's a suggested implementation:
export const UsersList: React.FC<UsersListParams> = ({users}) => {
if (!users.length) {
return (
<Box pad="medium" align="center">
<Text>No users found</Text>
</Box>
);
}
return (
<Box role="list" aria-label="Users list">
{users.map(user => (
<Box
pad="small"
key={user.id}
direction="row"
align="center"
role="listitem"
>
{user.isAdmin ? (
<UserAdmin aria-label="Admin user" />
) : (
<User aria-label="Regular user" />
)}
<AnchorLink
to={user.id}
style={{
overflow: 'hidden',
textOverflow: 'ellipsis',
marginLeft: '8px'
}}
>
{user.username}
</AnchorLink>
</Box>
))}
</Box>
);
};
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
[email protected]
.Documentation