Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Move model from one project to another #1057

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2023
Merged

feat: Move model from one project to another #1057

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

Paula-Kli
Copy link
Contributor

@Paula-Kli Paula-Kli commented Sep 28, 2023

closes #799

currently the dialog looks like that:
Bildschirmfoto 2023-09-28 um 17 47 44

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (7f1b267) 71.83% compared to head (848b57e) 71.98%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1057      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.83%   71.98%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         160      160              
  Lines        5087     5111      +24     
  Branches      547      555       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         3654     3679      +25     
+ Misses       1323     1322       -1     
  Partials      110      110              
Files Coverage Δ
backend/capellacollab/projects/routes.py 83.78% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️
backend/capellacollab/projects/toolmodels/crud.py 77.08% <100.00%> (+2.61%) ⬆️
...ackend/capellacollab/projects/toolmodels/models.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ackend/capellacollab/projects/toolmodels/routes.py 75.51% <75.00%> (+3.71%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Paula-Kli
Copy link
Contributor Author

Paula-Kli commented Sep 28, 2023

Still missing:

  • Tests for the backend
  • Search should be over full width
  • Search should actually be working and searching

@Paula-Kli Paula-Kli force-pushed the move-model branch 3 times, most recently from d78d9c7 to 9c92dc2 Compare October 10, 2023 16:57
@Paula-Kli Paula-Kli marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2023 17:20
@Paula-Kli Paula-Kli force-pushed the move-model branch 3 times, most recently from 3bb4ca3 to fdba987 Compare October 12, 2023 13:21
Copy link
Contributor

@dominik003 dominik003 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice improvement. Moving toolmodels to another project works fine and everything seems to work fine after moving it. However, there are some backend comments, mostly regarding readability and the use of already existing authentication functions, and a few frontend comments, mostly dealing with potential UI improvements.

@Paula-Kli Paula-Kli force-pushed the move-model branch 2 times, most recently from 2c014ba to 4839ddd Compare October 19, 2023 15:30
Users might want to move a toolmodel from one project to another without deleting it and all its pipeline before adding it again. This is possible with one simple click.
Copy link
Member

@MoritzWeber0 MoritzWeber0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@MoritzWeber0 MoritzWeber0 merged commit df3e867 into main Oct 25, 2023
23 checks passed
@MoritzWeber0 MoritzWeber0 deleted the move-model branch October 25, 2023 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move tool models to another project
3 participants