Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(user): Add quick comparision of Capella co-working methods #1022

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

MoritzWeber0
Copy link
Member

The co-working methods TeamForCapella and Git are compared in a table.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (bba492a) 71.14% compared to head (42040a9) 71.14%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1022   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.14%   71.14%           
=======================================
  Files         154      154           
  Lines        4820     4820           
  Branches      513      513           
=======================================
  Hits         3429     3429           
  Misses       1294     1294           
  Partials       97       97           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@Paula-Kli Paula-Kli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This table is a good idea to get a good overview over the different working modes and what consequences it has choosing one or the other in short words 👍

The co-working methods TeamForCapella and Git are compared in a table.
@MoritzWeber0 MoritzWeber0 merged commit 10b969e into main Sep 19, 2023
23 checks passed
@MoritzWeber0 MoritzWeber0 deleted the docs-compare-git-t4c branch September 19, 2023 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants