Skip to content
/ SMV Public

Code and data for the ACL 2023 NLReasoning Workshop paper "Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methods" (Feldhus et al., 2023)

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

DFKI-NLP/SMV

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Saliency Map Verbalization

Verbalizing saliency maps with templates and binary filtering as well as instruction-based LLMs

alt text

arXiv

Getting started:

  1. You should use Python 3.8
  2. clone this repository
  3. pip install -r requirements

Example usage

To verbalize a dataset you first need to write a config file, the rest will be managed by the Verbalizer class object. We provide some examplatory config files to play around with. After defining a config you can use it to immediately get an explanation. For a fast start, look at our demo.py, if you only want a fast explanation, that is all you need.

from src.search_methods import fastexplain as fe

config_path = "configs/toy_dev.yml"
explanation_string = fe.explain(config_path)
for explanation in explanation_string:
    print(explanation)

Just like in demo.py. Output (one explanation).:

SAMPLE:
fantastic , madonna at her finest , the film is funny and her 
acting is brilliant . it may have been made in the 80 ' s but it has all the 
qualities of a modern hollywood block - buster . i love this 
film and i think its totally unique and will cheer up any dr ##oop 
##y person within a matter of minutes . fantastic .

subclass 'convolution search'
snippet: 'i love this ' contains 53.51% of prediction score.
snippet: 'love this and ' contains 44.96% of prediction score.
snippet: '. love this ' contains 43.72% of prediction score.
snippet: 'love this i ' contains 43.67% of prediction score.
snippet: 'love this film ' contains 42.52% of prediction score.
subclass 'span search'
snippet: 'i love this film and ' contains 57.03% of prediction score.
snippet: '. i love this film ' contains 55.78% of prediction score.
snippet: 'i love this ' contains 53.51% of prediction score.
snippet: 'love this film and i ' contains 47.19% of prediction score.
snippet: 'love this film ' contains 42.52% of prediction score.
subclass 'concatenation search'
The phrase » i love this « is most important for the prediction (54 %).
subclass 'compare search'
snippet: 'this film and' occurs in all searches and accounts for 28.74% of prediction score
snippet: 'love this film' occurs in all searches and accounts for 42.52% of prediction score
snippet: 'i love this' occurs in all searches and accounts for 53.51% of prediction score
snippet: '. i love' occurs in all searches and accounts for 30.03% of prediction score
subclass 'total order'
top tokens are:
token 'this' with 25.22% of prediction score
token 'love' with 16.76% of prediction score
token 'i' with 11.53% of prediction score
token 'unique' with 3.98% of prediction score
Prediction was correct.

Note that the original output will be colourcoded

How our search methods work

alt text

Advanced

Otherwise, if you don't like the format in which we represent explanations, you can get the raw output of our search methods like this, by using the Verbalizer directly.

import src.dataloader as data
import src.tools as tools

config_path = "configs/toy_dev.yml"
config, source = tools.read_config(config_path)
verbalizer = data.Verbalizer(source, config=config)

explanations, texts, searches = verbalizer()

for search_type in explanations:
    for explanation_key in explanations[search_type]:
        print(explanations[search_type][explanation_key])

Note that verbalizer() calls verbalizer.doit() also multiprocess is set to True by default, disabling is encouraged for systems with less than 8GB RAM or systems with less than 4 (physical) cores. disabling multiprocessing can lead to 5x increased running time.

This will produce the same explanation like the demo but the resulting string is not formatted and there will be less salient findings too. The variable texts will contain the samples of the dataset you chose to explain, searches will contain our calculated values for span- and convolution search (np.array). explanations itself will be a dictionary, that is ordered like this:

Top layer Accessed layer
values multiple dict objects list of string
keys "span_search", "convolution_search", "compare search", "total order", "summarization" string like "1", "2",...

alt text

Manual config writing

You currently have two methods of generating a config. The first one is manual. The presented example is the "toy_dev.yml".

source: "thermostat/imdb-bert-lig"
sgn: "+"
samples: 100
metric:
  name: "mean"
  value: 0.4
multiprocessing: True
dev: True
maxwords: 100
mincoverage: .1

By changing the sgn parameter to "-" or None, you´d allow the verbalizer to take negative values as such, leading to different results, even though we found "+" to work best in general. by changing metric to one of our proposed metrics (quantile, mean), you can change the generation of the baseline value at which a sample snippet gets considered salient and thus returned. If you enable the dev parameter, you can search for specific classes of samples. Currently implemented is: the filtering of the length of samples (via maxwords) and mincoverage, which checks the generated verbalizations for snippets of atleast n% coverage, if no snippet has at least n% coverage, the sample is not considered valid and thus the index will not be saved.

Config constructor

Our second method of building a config file is a small plug-and-play like system.

import src.fastcfg as cfg
import src.search_methods.fastexplain as fe

# fixme: only lig and occ implemented in converter in src.fastcfg.Source, implement rest too.

source = cfg.Source(modelname="Name of your model, for example Bert",
                    datasetname= "Name of the dataset, for example IMDB",
                    explainername= "Full name of the explanation algorithm, for example Layer Integrated Gradients")
config = cfg.Config(src=source,
                    sgn= "+",
                    samples= 100)
# With Config.get_possible_configurations() you can get a dictionary containing all possible configurations i.e. models,
# datasets and explainers
explanations = fe.explain(config)
for explanation in explanations:
    print(explanation)

# you can also save a generated Config:
filename = "filename.yml"
with open(filename) as f:
    f.write(config.to_yaml())

With this you can change specific parameters on-the-fly for fast-testing of multiple configurations.

Filtering of results

Our filtering methods require some changes to the code from the Getting started section.

import src.dataloader as data
import src.tools as tools

config_path = "configs/toy_dev.yml"
config, source = tools.read_config(config_path)
verbalizer = data.Verbalizer(source, config=config, multiprocess=True)

maxwords = 100
mincoverage = 0.1


explanations, texts, searches = verbalizer()
valid_keys = verbalizer.filter_verbalizations(explanations, texts, searches,
                                                  maxwords=maxwords, mincoverage=mincoverage)
for key in valid_keys:
    print(explanations[key])

Note that this can also be done via the src.search_methods.fastexplain.explain method and a given config, without the need of changing any code. Additionally, if you want to explain a dataset and save the explanations for later use, we´ve implemented a to_json, that is currently usable via the fastexplain.explain method, by setting the to_json parameter to True.

For further information you can look at the documentation of the Verbalizer class or our provided demos Most of our code is documented and built to be changed easily.

Search Types

As proposed in our paper, we employ different search methods to search for salient snippets. You can set your desired searches by changing the mode parameter of dataloader.Verbalizer.doit(). Default employs all our algorithms.

Name Description
convolution search implements our proposed Convolution Search
span search implements our proposed Span Search
compare search filters for multiple equal results in convolution & span search
total order filters for top-k tokens
summarization implements our proposed Summarized Explanation

Config parameter cheat-sheet

Parameter Values Description Dtype(s)
source Path to file Path to config file str
multiprocessing True, False: True is default Should our multiprocessing implementation of our paper be used bool
sgn "+", "-", None Values of what sign should be used for calculation, None uses all str, None
samples Any of {-1, (0, +oo]} -1 to read whole dataset, any other number to read int
metric:name See documentation of dataloader How should the baseline value be calculated str
metric:value Depends on metric, see docs of dataloader What value should be used to generate baseline value float
dev True, False, default is False Enables further settings, allowing to filter the dataset, if False, maxwords and mincoverage will be ignored bool
maxwords any of (0, +oo] Filters for samples that have a maximum of maxwords words int
mincoverage any of [0., 1.] Filters for samples with a snippet of at least mincoverage% of coverage float

Please note that this is still in development and object to change

GPT verbalizations

Click here

Citation

@inproceedings{feldhus-2023-smv,
    title = "Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methods",
    author = "Nils Feldhus and Leonhard Hennig and Maximilian Dustin Nasert and Christopher Ebert and Robert Schwarzenberg and Sebastian M\"{o}ller",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the First Workshop on Natural Language Reasoning and Structured Explanations (NLRSE)",
    year = "2023",
    address = "Toronto, Canada",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07222",
}

ACL Anthology version to be added in July.

About

Code and data for the ACL 2023 NLReasoning Workshop paper "Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methods" (Feldhus et al., 2023)

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages