Ubuntu 24.04 1.3.1.1 Ensure AppArmor is installed

[ericeberry]

Description:

• Ubuntu 24.04 1.3.1.1 Ensure AppArmor is installed

Rationale:

• Implement Ubuntu 24.04 1.3.1.1 Ensure AppArmor is installed

[openshift-ci]

Hi @ericeberry. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[github-actions]

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

ubuntu2404 (from CTF) Environment (using Fedora as testing environment)

Fedora Testing Environment

Oracle Linux 8 Environment

[mpurg]

lgtm

[dodys]

/packit build

[dodys]

/packit build

[dodys]

/packit build

[dodys]

this is failing in ctest:

Rule 'package_apparmor-utils_installed' must be assigned to component 'apparmor-utils', because rule uses template 'package_installed' with 'pkgname' parameter set to 'apparmor-utils' which is a package that already belongs to component 'apparmor-utils'.

[ericeberry]

this is failing in ctest:

Rule 'package_apparmor-utils_installed' must be assigned to component 'apparmor-utils', because rule uses template 'package_installed' with 'pkgname' parameter set to 'apparmor-utils' which is a package that already belongs to component 'apparmor-utils'.

New apparmor-utils created

[mpurg]

Looks like it needs to be also in the apparmor component:

Rule 'package_apparmor-utils_installed' must be in component 'apparmor' because it's a member of 'apparmor' group.

[ericeberry]

Looks like it needs to be also in the apparmor component:

Rule 'package_apparmor-utils_installed' must be in component 'apparmor' because it's a member of 'apparmor' group.

Added back

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 33ac711 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 60.9% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

[dodys]

lgtm, thanks!