♻️ Refacto chips

[FelixLgr]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Default value for the active prop in the Chips component set to false.

• Bug Fixes

  • Streamlined button attributes for improved clarity.

• Refactor

  • Simplified the internal logic for constructing class names in the Chips component.
  • Updated type definitions for children in ChipsProps and ChipsListProps interfaces to enhance type handling.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Chips component and its related prop interfaces across multiple files. The changes primarily involve refining type definitions and component signatures, including updating the children prop type in ChipsListProps and ChipsProps, and adding a default value for the active prop in the Chips component. These adjustments aim to improve type strictness and component initialization.

Changes

File	Change Summary
packages/react/components/chips/Chips.tsx	- Updated function signature with default active prop set to false - Condensed classes variable construction - Simplified button element attributes
packages/react/components/chips/ChipsProps.ts	- Changed children type from `string
packages/react/components/chips/list/ChipsListProps.ts	- Modified children type from `React.ReactNode

Suggested labels

Ready

Suggested reviewers

• JulienMora

Poem

🐰 Chips dancing with grace so light,
Types refined, no string in sight,
Active prop defaults with care,
Components leap without a snare,
Rabbit's code hops clean and bright! 🍪

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

packages/react/components/chips/ChipsProps.ts (1)

9-9: Update JSDoc in Chips.tsx to match the new type

The JSDoc in Chips.tsx still describes the children prop as {string}, which is now inconsistent with this updated type definition.

- * @param children {string} Chips content
+ * @param children {React.ReactNode} Chips content

packages/react/components/chips/Chips.tsx (1)

Line range hint 8-19: Update JSDoc to match current implementation

The JSDoc needs several updates to match the current implementation:

1. children type should be React.ReactNode
2. onClick documentation should be reviewed based on current usage
3. Consider adding @default false for the active prop

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44f4c6f and 5aefb82.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• packages/react/components/chips/Chips.tsx (2 hunks)
• packages/react/components/chips/ChipsProps.ts (1 hunks)
• packages/react/components/chips/list/ChipsListProps.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

packages/react/components/chips/list/ChipsListProps.ts (1)

7-7: LGTM! Type simplification improves clarity

The change from React.ReactNode | React.ReactElement to React.ReactNode is a good simplification since React.ReactNode already includes React.ReactElement. This removes redundancy while maintaining the same functionality.

packages/react/components/chips/ChipsProps.ts (1)

9-9: LGTM! Type simplification improves consistency

The change from string | React.ReactNode to React.ReactNode is a good simplification since React.ReactNode already includes string type. This also aligns with the type used in ChipsListProps.

packages/react/components/chips/Chips.tsx (2)

20-20: LGTM! Good improvements to component initialization

The changes improve the component by:

1. Adding a default value for active prop
2. Simplifying the class construction
3. Streamlining the button props

Also applies to: 23-23, 26-26

---

20-20: Verify onClick handler implementation

The onClick prop is defined in ChipsProps but not destructured here. Please verify if this is intentional or if the click handling needs to be restored.