Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove ranks-cpus warning as can be inaccurate #66

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

1uc
Copy link
Contributor

@1uc 1uc commented Oct 20, 2023

The warning is misleading and causes users to run simulation with more resources than needed. Since the magic cutoff is neither a lower bound, nor an upper bound (by many orders of magnitude), we should simply not print anything.

For cases where resource consumption is hard to estimate we encourage user to try the new dry-run

pramodk
pramodk previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@pramodk pramodk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since long time, I am in support of this :)

@bbpbuildbot

This comment has been minimized.

@bbpbuildbot

This comment has been minimized.

@bbpbuildbot

This comment has been minimized.

@ferdonline
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks. I will close in favor of #67

@ferdonline ferdonline closed this Oct 24, 2023
@ferdonline ferdonline reopened this Oct 24, 2023
@ferdonline ferdonline changed the title Remove misleading warning. Remove ranks-cpus warning as can be inaccurate Oct 24, 2023
@bbpbuildbot

This comment has been minimized.

@bbpbuildbot

This comment has been minimized.

@bbpbuildbot

This comment has been minimized.

@bbpbuildbot
Copy link

Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #164692 (:no_entry:) have been uploaded here!

Status and direct links:

@ferdonline ferdonline merged commit 3527358 into main Oct 25, 2023
2 checks passed
@ferdonline ferdonline deleted the 1uc/remove-bad-warning branch October 25, 2023 09:12
WeinaJi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
The warning is misleading and causes users to run simulation with more
resources than needed. Since the magic cutoff is neither a lower bound,
nor an upper bound (by many orders of magnitude), we should simply not
print anything.

For cases where resource consumption is hard to estimate we encourage
user to try the new dry-run
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants