Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix NullPointerException when native class is not present #198
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix NullPointerException when native class is not present #198
Changes from all commits
f003a0d
2d3b038
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the
!
shouldn't be there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
!null
is nottrue
. if we get!false
it istrue
like expected. Inversion operates only on bool values.In this case:
!
. If property is present - it will be inversedBut if you mean that the condition itself is false to begin with, then I'm not sure what that field points to.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to indicate the presence of a destructor. And if there is no destructor, then we add a reference to the object in GC to finalize it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I initially meant
is false
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if native class has finalize, we add it to GC, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if (!nativeClassStruct.HasFinalize)
should be changed to one of the following, and I'm not sure which:if (nativeClassStruct?.HasFinalize is false)
if (nativeClassStruct?.HasFinalize is false or null)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The second one looks more correct. If I understood the logic correctly - if native class does not have destructor, we add a reference in GC. When native class pointer is null we also need to keep track of the created object. The problem may arise if a class without a pointer has a destructor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@js6pak Which do you think it should be, or how would you suggest we address the problem?