-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add parallel execution feature documentation #12
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
### Parallel execution | ||
|
||
Multiple flows which needs to run in parallel? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need*
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is a little weird the way of presenting it (by question and then answer the question), I think it adds unnecessary noise (time of reading) even though it might make reading a little less boring. Maybe just: If you want to run multiple parts of a flow in parallel (the order of such parts is not relevant for flow execution) then you can use the parallel step:
- !server { data: 48656C6C6F, port: 25} | ||
- !client { data: 48656C6C6F2C2049276D204A6F686E } | ||
``` | ||
- Parallel flows must have different port numbers specified |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is that so?
``` | ||
- Parallel flows must have different port numbers specified | ||
- **Include** is supported inside parallel in order to modularize or reuse an existent flow | ||
- Main flow won't continue until all parallel flows have ended |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess you may even include parallel inside include and parallel inside parallel, right?
No description provided.