Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add parallel execution feature documentation #12

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Baraujo25
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@Baraujo25 Baraujo25 requested a review from rabelenda September 6, 2022 19:06
@Baraujo25 Baraujo25 self-assigned this Sep 6, 2022

### Parallel execution

Multiple flows which needs to run in parallel?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need*

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is a little weird the way of presenting it (by question and then answer the question), I think it adds unnecessary noise (time of reading) even though it might make reading a little less boring. Maybe just: If you want to run multiple parts of a flow in parallel (the order of such parts is not relevant for flow execution) then you can use the parallel step:

- !server { data: 48656C6C6F, port: 25}
- !client { data: 48656C6C6F2C2049276D204A6F686E }
```
- Parallel flows must have different port numbers specified
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is that so?

```
- Parallel flows must have different port numbers specified
- **Include** is supported inside parallel in order to modularize or reuse an existent flow
- Main flow won't continue until all parallel flows have ended
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you may even include parallel inside include and parallel inside parallel, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants