Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add spatial_data to csm serialization #364
Add spatial_data to csm serialization #364
Changes from 6 commits
ec7ebfa
edb2248
2c0f7ea
51ad3a5
c6464fb
6a3bb9a
13c799c
a359343
76bbb74
d2bbc52
cc98edb
5a110c0
2544680
8d5dd1e
ba5cd4f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use
==
here once implementedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't compare equal:
The data seems to be equal, but since compare nested is using xarrays
identical
function, we get aFalse
returned.I remember that we had trouble with the
identical
function before because it also considers the order of dimensions, coordinates etc. Alternatively, we can useequals
for a more relaxed comparison but I am not sure if this is really what we want.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this happens because of the
.name
property that get's created when reading arrays from asdf files (due toNDArrayType
wrapper)see #110 and a possible workaround (reading explicitly as
np.asarray
from tree here 1dd1f23)maybe we should ask for a solution over at asdf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll try the workaround for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works now. Think we can merge